Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harvard researchers: Fetal pain bills are ‘neither scientifically nor constitutionally sound’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 09:35 AM
Original message
Harvard researchers: Fetal pain bills are ‘neither scientifically nor constitutionally sound’
Harvard researchers: Fetal pain bills are ‘neither scientifically nor constitutionally sound’

This past legislative session, Florida was among a handful of states that sought to limit access to abortions when the age of the fetus is 20 weeks or more. The reasoning behind such restrictions is based on scientifically disputed claims that a fetus can feel pain starting at 20 weeks. While Florida did not eventually pass House Bill 321, Idaho, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Kansas, and Indiana have all passed bills that make such restrictions. #

According to Mother Jones, a pair of Harvard researchers studied the bills and have found that they are neither “neither scientifically nor constitutionally sound”: #


In a recent paper in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Glenn Cohen of Harvard Law School and Sadath Sayeed of Harvard Medical School note that there is no conclusive evidence that fetuses can feel pain at that point in gestation, nor are they considered viable. #

While there’s an established body of evidence that fetuses start developing the biological pathways related to pain sensation at this stage, there is not enough data to suggest that they can actually experience it. The bulk of the scientific literature on the subject indicates that the brain connections required to feel pain are not in place until at least 24 weeks. The lawmakers and anti-abortion groups arguing for the 20-week bans are “espousing a view that aligns with the political hope” rather than medical evidence, says Sayeed, who is both a neonatologist and a lawyer. #


It has been argued that much like “Personhood” amendments, the disputed constitutionality of fetal pain bills are part of a strategy to bring a legal fight to the U.S. Supreme Court. More specifically, groups are looking to have Roe v. Wade overturned. #

http://floridaindependent.com/31537/fetal-pain-researc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. What do they know?
They're just MDs talented enough to be researchers at Harvard. They deal with what they CLAIM to be "facts." What fools. Don't they know that science is satanic bullshit and the only thing that matters is a hotline to Jebus? :crazy:

(Is the sarcasm smiley really necessary?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC