Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh oh Big Ed Schultz might be in a bit of trouble. . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:22 PM
Original message
Oh oh Big Ed Schultz might be in a bit of trouble. . .
He shouldn't have gone there and should be fined/suspended but I think losing his job over this would be wrong.

MSNBC’s Ed Schultz Calls Radio Host Laura Ingraham A ‘Right Wing Slut’

MSNBC host Ed Schultz is known for his hyperbolic attacks on Republicans but it looks like he may have crossed the line on his show yesterday by labeling Laura Ingraham a "right wing slut."

"President Obama is going to be visiting Joplin, Mo., on Sunday but you know what they're talking about, like this right-wing slut, what's her name?, Laura Ingraham?" he said on his radio show. "Yeah, she's a talk slut. You see, she was, back in the day, praising President Reagan when he was drinking a beer overseas. But now that Obama's doing it, they're working him over."

The epithet against conservative radio host Ingraham, which was first flagged by The Daily Caller, is quickly making the rounds online. TPM reached out to representatives for MSNBC and Ed Schultz for comment but did not immediately get a response. A spokesman for Ingraham told TPM she had no comment at this time.

This isn't the first time Schultz has gotten into trouble for bashing the right. Earlier this year he apologized for calling Republicans "bastards" during his TV show. Given the even greater severity of his remarks on Tuesday, it seems likely an apology -- at the very least -- will follow soon.
-snip-

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/05/msnbcs-ed-schultz-calls-radio-host-laura-ingraham-a-right-wing-slut.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nonperson Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are you fucking kidding?
Calling Ingraham a slut is an act of kindness to her and an affront to sluts everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Though Rush, et al, are never fined nor suspended?
Bit of a massive double standard, what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. they should be fined and suspended. there shouldn't be a double standard.
it should apply everywhere. if it should apply to ed, it should apply to limbaugh. i am sick of these guys who decide to fine or suspend picking and choosing based on politics who gets fined and who doesn't. apply the rules evenly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. But don't they work for different people?
Barring violations of the law, it's up to their employers whether or not they are sanctioned for this or that remark. If MSNBC chooses punish Schultz, that's their business, just as its Rush's employer (not sure who that is . . . EIB or something?) who gets to decide when and if he has crossed the line.

I think the nature of the outfits might play a role here. I remember when Rush came onto the scene he was marketed as a 'shock jock.' He talks about politics, but essentially he's selling entertainment. MSNBC is different since they style themselves as a real news organization and thus have higher standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am a fan of Ed but lately he has come across as just mean
Edited on Wed May-25-11 02:36 PM by Botany
No joy in his voice, no smile on his face, just surly ass mean. He has to dial it back quite a bit ....
his voice is too important to lose but if he keeps this stuff up they will find a reason to can his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
39. The was Barry Goldwater and Jesse Helms were conservatives with snarls
Ed Schultz and Alan Grayson are Democrats with snarls. Meanness unfortunately exists in both parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. calling someone a bastard seems fine... but calling someone a slut... even
laura ingram... not cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. +1
I agree...the republicans ARE bastards, by definition...calling a woman a slut, even if that woman is a despicable right-wing bigot like Ingram is well over the line IMHO..

Ed should apologize and move on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. When you think about it, the term bastard has origins which border on sexist as well
just because the stigma of being a bastard is more an emphasis on the stigma of being an unmarried woman who gets pregnant, while there's less stigma on an unmarried man getting a woman pregnant. But bastard's origin has luckily kind of gone by the wayside and now it just means "bad person". And I have a lot less problem using that to describe Republicans than "slut", although I've been calling them "corporate whores" for years. Am I a bastard for doing that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. corporate whore seems fine. i have no problem with that and seems it is quite
fitting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. What about using the term "talk slut"
talking about a male? Would that be different?

I think it would... at least I would be more likely to say that (although actually, I've pretty much never used the term slut) about a man than a woman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. for some reason i don't like the word slut so much. not sure why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I think he wouldn't have used the word slut if he was talking about a guy
and I think that's the problem with what he said.

No, I don't like it either, and I don't use it, I can't remember ever having used it. I don't want to say that I haven't, but I don't remember ever doing it.

I think he stepped in it a little bit on this one... but really, the apology he owes is more to society/women in general than to the person he was talking about specifically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, at least he didn't use The Rude Pundit's description of her.
:hide:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. you're not gonna make us beg, are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ed owes an apology to sluts everywhere
for equating them with Ingraham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. & an idiot with a gift of unbridled, hate-filled garbage-gab
Let's be exact now, Ed. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyHawkAZ Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. And people question why SlutWalk is so important...
good grief. I have no problem at all with calling this evil POS bad names like, well, evil POS etc., but leave gender and sexuality out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Habibi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Yes.
INDEED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IcyPeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. he "misspoke" he meant to say "nut" (that would be...
the GOP's statement and all would be forgiven)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Too bad it never works both ways.
Rightwingers will and can say hateful things about others every single day without mention or reprimand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. That's because their audience is equally hateful.
We ought to be better than that. I loathe Laura Lingraham, but I do think "slut" is over the line, and needlessly sexist. This wouldn't bother Hannity's crowd, but it should bother us, because we're not comprised entirely of assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Not the first time. He called Randi Rhodes a slut, too.
She called him a Republican. Touché. That was, like maybe four years ago.

More recently, he called David Sirota's talk show and told him to "go to hell".

He's definitely got a case of the red-ass in him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'll agree---when Ann Coulter gets arrested for slander and libel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Too bad he didn't say, "Laura, you ignorant slut"
He could have passed it off as a riff on the old "Jane, you ignorant slut" SNL joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brigid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. We must be about the same age!
I miss the old SNL! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Yep, older than dirt
and not yet ready for prime time. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. I'm in that club
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. You mean Laura "shut up and sing" Ingraham?
I wouldn't call her a 'slut'. I would call her a pompous, bloviating fucktard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Even better
Hey Ed - feel free to use Warren's slur! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. :yawn:
get the apology over with...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. Right Wing HATE Radio promotes violence.
Edited on Wed May-25-11 04:06 PM by Dawson Leery
Where is the call for censorhip for this? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. Nicer than what I call her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. Same here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
29. Not here, he isn't
Sure there seems to be some people who object, but he has his supporters cheering him on. I guess for an encore, he could go after Charles Krauthammer next... maybe pull something from Clerks II...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfaAwt_-Q7o








:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
38. She's not a slut, she's a whore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC