|
Edited on Mon May-23-11 08:08 AM by Divernan
We know whomever the GOP candidate will be, he or she will be pro MIC, i.e, perpetual, profiteering war. I think whomever the GOP runs will pretty much be a sacrificial lamb because the GOP leaders are happy with the policies of the current administration. And we know the current administration's willingness to engage in and expand overseas military actions. There might be a little "chess-playing", i.e, promises to move the pawns out of Iraq "next year", which leaves the administration the options of (1) simply moving the pawns to another war OR (2) "regretfully" announcing that due to unforeseen developments in Iraq, we will have to delay removing the pawns.
Some call this smooth talking approach to governing "chess=playing". I think of it more as a carnie's shell game. Definitions: A game involving sleight of hand, in which three inverted cups or nutshells are moved about, and contestants must spot which is the one with a pea or other object underneath; A deceptive and evasive action or ploy, esp. a political one.
Of course the beauty of pulling the pawns out of Iraq and re-assigning them to Afghanistan, Libya or an as yet to be determined war zone, is that the military HAS to destroy tons of weapons & equipment, rather than leave them behind, and then has to replace all that "stuff" with NEW weapons and equipment. My god, how the profits roll in!
And then with the push to voucher/privatize the school system, the parents who have managed to hang onto their jobs will be able to pay the difference between the vouchers and charter/private/parochial school tuitions and concentrate their kids in good schools, and the children of poor/marginally employed will remain in underfunded public schools, getting even shittier educations, leaving them with enlisting in the military as their only option other than the fast food market. One hand washes the other for the profiteers.
|