Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama talk about Public Option.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
NewLIfeArea Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:56 PM
Original message
Obama talk about Public Option.
The public option, he said, "is an area that has just become symbolic of a lot of ideological fights." But, Obama added: "As a practical matter, this is not the most important aspect of this bill — the House bill or the Senate bill."

Only "a few million people" who buy into the insurance exchange set up in the bill would have benefited from the public option, he said.

"So it wasn’t like suddenly everybody would just go out there and buy a government-run plan," Obama said. "Most people will still get health insurance from their employers."

http://www.politico.com/politico44/perm/1209/obama_watched_the_vote_3dac2d12-13ff-416b-9394-16cf24e21c02.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. gawd, the man is fucking clueless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's exactly right. The public option, at least in its final form,
was never going to make much difference. A good thing, but a small good thing compared to the rest of the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Most people dont seem to get that...
Even though Obama lied and said he would veto any bill without a ROBUST public option, both the House and Senate Bill has a suck public option.
The CBO said the House bill would have only covered 6 million and the Senate version would have only covered 3 million. Only a very small pool of people were even going to be allowed into the so called public option.

So Obama is correct in that respect. The huge distraction concerning the public option was a joke. It was two camps arguing over the merits of an utterly weak public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BP2 Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. HUH - The huge distraction concerning the public option was a joke?! So are you trying to say that


this was all part of some master plan of subterfuge in the negotiation process, for Obama to drop something he never intended in the first place?!

If that's true, a lot of Obama supporters are going to feel very USED that they were pawns in his little scheme to support Big Pharma and Big Insurance!

A LOT OF OBAMA SUPPORTERS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Kinda...
I'm not saying it was a master plan of subterfuge, but it was something that he did not care about. Not only did he not fight for it, but he gave up on it before the negotiations even began. And yes, this Obama supporter feels USED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Obama didn't make it a non-entity. Congress did.
What Obama did was leave Congress pretty much alone, as long as it produced legislation that expanded coverage and didn't increase the deficit. We can debate whether or not this was a good idea. But it is not the same as direct responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BP2 Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Direct responsibility will occur when Obama elects to

use his VETO power and says, "Congress, do it again and do it right with the items I outlined in the beginning."

Conversely, direct responsibility will also occur if he elects to sign it.

One of those two options is correct. The other is politically expedient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Vetoing or signing is a package deal. He can't amend the legislation.
So, no, he wouldn't be directly responsible then either.

The most you can say is that it's possible, in some counterfactual, things might have turned out differently: if Obama had fought harder, etc. But that's very far from a sure thing--we needed sixty votes, it's far from clear that there would have been enough whatever Obama had did--and even if it were, it would be the incidental consequence of a certain political tactic, one that bears on the merit of the tactic but that does not show that Obama never "really" supported the public option in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. that is exactly what is being said
first he talks about some vague, nebulous "public option" (he called it a "government option" this summer, which was real helpful while the teabaggers were screaming about "socialism" and "a government plan"--just a subtle way to help along the confusion and distortions)--never explaining how it could work, what it would be in any detail---then he hands the whole subject of "health care reform" it to Max Baucus after a fake "promise" that "everybody would have a seat at the table"--expressed no concern about the fact that doctors and nurses (the Baucus 13) were arrested for trying to get a place at that table for single-payer advocates--single-payer was treated like some circus freak show, something he glanced at with disdain and amusement (the same way he regarded the topic of legalization of marijuana on about Day 2, even though it was voted #1 most popular topic for "change" by his own website's survey)--so anyway, I'm tired and don't feel like typing out the chronology again, you can look it up. I'm done with the phony. He didn't do jack to push a "public option" (which just became weak and distorted as the process dragged on), and he made no complaint, expressed no concern that it was finally dropped. He'll apparently sign anything, it doesn't matter.

He had no great expectations, and that's what he got: nothing great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Well, even a weak version would have given future reform something
to work with in the future.

Its always easier to reform and improve a government ran program than it will be to try and change anything in the future relating to private insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. That's a fair point; from an incrementalist perspective it would have been better.
But, then, you could reverse that reasoning and point out that precisely for that reason it wasn't going to happen politically: conservative Democrats were too unwilling to countenance the idea of anything that could lead to single-payer, or any approximation thereof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. I currently get my insurance through my employer
for me the status quo isn't working. I can't afford health care right now and it will only increase in cost in the future.

But I am glad that Obama will get a major victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Well, you wouldn't be able to get the Public Option plan if you're employed, either
Unless you work for an extremely small employer. Did everybody think they would be able to buy this Public Option plan? Because honestly, only 2-3 million people out of the 300 million people in America were going to be eligible anyway. And let's say you were eligible to buy into it: did you realize it would cost you slightly more than a private plan? That's what the CBO said. It had been weakened to the point of being completely immaterial. We fought for the public option (and that includes me: I actually rallied with signs for it and went to a few public meetings) as a foot-in-the-door measure. And I'm sorry it's gone. But it probably wasn't going to help YOU at all.

But I am getting really tired of how everyone thinks this is about them. (think: Carly Simon).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. point taken
well met.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Your honest response is a kind of xmas present to me
I stayed away from here for a few weeks, because it was getting to be such a madhouse. And since I've returned the last day or two, I've gotten nothing but blank stares or hostility when I try to put forth an argument. I was just about to give up and go away again, thinking it's kind of useless: everyone (and I guess that includes me) is so set in their position, there is really no chance to have a rational discussion.

So your gesture of saying "point taken" has restored my faith! We can have a discussion! (Even if we may disagree.)

I truly appreciate your little gift! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Peace and low stress my friend
I love DU but tend to stay in the small groups as GD is too fast and furious for me..
peace and hang in there..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why did he bother? Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Silly. Because we wouldn't have contributed all that money, sent those emails, etc.
He's not STUPID!

If they told us that he'd support a mandate to buy private insurance, with no public option and the chance to break free of the private shackles, we would have NEVER donated all that money, wrote all those emails, signed all those petitions, etc.

Give him a little credit, will you?

He can't ask for more money NOW...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BP2 Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. And under the bus we

GO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. So, you water the public option down to the point where it's virtually useless and then say it's no
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 07:04 PM by Blasphemer
great loss. That wasn't intentional or anything was it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
34. as something purely symbolic
it's pretty clear that the "PO" was never part of the plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. Access to health insurance should NOT be through employers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. ....
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. Sure, the public option is just a symbol--for the elite whose healthcare is taken care of.
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 07:44 PM by rudy23
He's really showing an amazing lack of empathy that rivals the last occupant of the Oval Office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewLIfeArea Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. pass new Health Care bill
As baby step.. later they will add some new bills.. possible public option or single payer..
just baby step for all of us..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. blah blah blah
When this BS piece of crap legislation comes back and bites the Dems in the ass in 2010 and 2012, remember where you heard it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
23. both my wife and I would have qualified for the public option
it wasn't "symbolic" at all.

And quite frankly, tying insurance to your employer is a dumb fucking idea. This whole process has been one giant clusterfuck, where the powers that be got a seat at the table while the rest of us - well, it's just not "practical" to include us in this discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Tell Lieberdork
Since it's all about you, maybe Lieberman just didn't understand that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. all about me, huh?
another of your stock insults

fuck you

fuck you and the whole lot of pom pom assholes who have infested this website

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
25. Where is NewLifeArea?
Where did NewLifeArea go? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewLIfeArea Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. i'm here
Hello?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. ..
:rofl:

I think that this one has been called many different things this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
31. I don't get why he changed his mind on it
OTOH, I'm not sure why it would be so much better. It would still have to charge enough to pay for health care costs. DU is attached to it as if it were a magical thing right now, yet it would just be "insurance" which is not "health care" and it an idea invented by those horrid insurance companies.

But candidate Obama seemed to think it was important at the time. Then again, whatever he said, he didn't know what Congress he would get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
32. Well yeah -- Since you allowed it to become a meaningless public option
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 10:46 PM by Armstead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
35. "Obama talk"
Ahhhh, there's the one area he's good at.

Remember the soaring speeches about platitudes? "We are the ones we've been waiting for".......change......hope.....blah, blah, blah........

He struck me then as a bullshit artist who was deft about talking about nothing much, but who thanks to his oratory and Axelrod & Plouffe was able to sell a bill of goods to his supporters. The young were all fired up for him, AAs finally had a viable candidate and the upwardly mobile whites felt good about themselves.

Interesting that two out of these three groups are the ones faring the worst in this recession. The young and AAs are the ones with the highest unemployment numbers.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltoman991 Donating Member (869 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Yeah, and the AAs and the
young are laying it all on Obama right? I mean hell, after 11 months on the job he should have been able to put every young person and every AA back to work right? Those past 8 years never really happened. They had shit to do with the way we are today. Damn you Obama for not cleaning up 8 years of bullshit in a week. You're a horrible horrible person who will not get my support in 2012.

How did I do? Do I qualify as an official Obama hater now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Hmmmm, not really.
But keep trying, it's a start........

:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltoman991 Donating Member (869 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Won't happen!!
See, I'm not one who wants it all my way and will stomp my feet and spread BS because I don't get it all my way. He is the President of the United States, not the President of Liberals only. Our side becomes no better than their side when we start acting the way we're acting now.

I voted for him in 2008, I will vote for him in 2012. He's done nothing that those who listened to him didn't think he would do. Those showing disgust now have proven themselves the ones who didn't listen to a damn word the man said.

And no one here who slams Obama holds Congress responsible for anything. Oh sure, when they're called on it they'll say they do, but finding a post showing Congress being blamed isn't easy on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
38. Yeah, it sucked after you weakened it and and torpedoed it after lying about it.
Honestly Mr. President, the less you say about this, the better.

We know now that this was just a boondoggle you used to get us on board.

Happy Xmas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. More "blame Obama first" hatred, he can't control Lieberman or Nelson...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. He can't control anything. He's just the president.
A powerless position with no powers.

Got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC