Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I did not support Hillary in 08 -- But her health plan was far better than this

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 10:52 AM
Original message
I did not support Hillary in 08 -- But her health plan was far better than this
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 10:54 AM by Armstead
I'm beginning to think i made a mistake in my support of Obama in 08 over Hillary.

Maybe her campaign promises would also have been compromised,. But I think she would have been much more effective at getting more of that she wanted. And what she wanted -- although not perfect -- was a lot better start than this crap that Obama is pushing now.

It contains aspects that are important -- Strong regulation and requirement that all insurere provide a basic affiordable plan, and a public optin similar to Medicare.

Maybe I goofed.

http://healthinsurance.about.com/od/healthinsurancebasi...

Senator Clinton proposes a plan for health care reform that will provide coverage to all Americans. Her proposal builds upon the existing health coverage infrastructure and promises that this expanded coverage can be funded through savings and cuts in other areas of governmental spending.

Coverage Options

Clinton's plan offers Americans the following coverage options:

* If you like your plan, you can keep it.
* If you don't like your plan, you have two options:
o Choose a new private plan from the menu of federal employee plans available to members of Congress; or
o Choose an affordable public plan similar to Medicare.

Individual Mandate and Consumer Protections

This reform proposal requires all Americans to obtain health coverage. Clinton would enact the following consumer protections to help Americans comply with this mandate:

* Insurance companies would be required to offer affordable coverage to all Americans, regardless of their health status. This means that individuals with preexisting health conditions would be able to obtain coverage in the private market if they so choose.
* Furthermore, Clinton would require that insurers devote a certain percentage of each premium dollar collected specifically towards the payment of claims, rather than towards excessive profits or marketing.
* Clinton's plan also proposes to keep premium rates low by promoting quality and efficiency of care.

Affordability of Coverage

Many Americans are concerned about rising health costs. Although Clinton's plan requires most Americans to contribute to the cost of their health care, she vows to keep costs down for the consumer by enacting the following protections:

* Clinton would offer families a refundable tax credit as financial assistance with the cost of individual health insurance. Because it is a tax credit (as opposed to a deduction) families would receive these funds regardless of whether they owe any income taxes.
* Health insurance premium payments would be limited to a percentage of a family's income.
* Large employers would be required to contribute to the cost of their employees' health coverage.
* Small employers would received refundable tax credits to encourage them to provide their employees with health coverage.
* Safety net programs, like Medicaid and SCHIP, would receive more funding to ensure that all vulnerable populations are reached, including poor adults without children.

Funding

Clinton believes that it will take approximately $110 billion to enact her plan. She hopes to generate this funding through the following means:

* Improving health care quality and efficiency
o Clinton would require all providers to adopt privacy-protected Health IT. This could improve efficiency by ensuring that all providers can access a single, comprehensive medical record for each individual patient.
o Preventive care would be a priority under this proposal. Diseases which are prevented or delayed will not tax the health care system with excess costs.
o People with chronic diseases account for a majority of health care spending in the United States. Improvements in chronic care would help contain health care spending.
o Research on the comparative effectiveness of various drugs, medical devices, and therapies would be supported and funded. Supporters of comparative effectiveness research believe that it can reduce health care costs and improve efficiency by identifying the most effective treatment for a particular disease or condition. It is likely that payments for "less effective" treatments would be reduced or eliminated.
* Eliminating government-authorized overpayments to Medicare private plans
* Redirecting funding formerly dedicated towards uncompensated care
* Negotiating lower prescription drug costs
* Reforming the tax code:
o Clinton would discontinue tax breaks available to families with over $250,000 per year in income.
o The current system which allows employees to deduct the cost of their health coverage before income tax is applied would be limited. Any amount spent in excess of the premium charged under a standard health plan must be subject to income tax.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Democratic discussion forum
   Replies to this thread
  - and you really think she wasnt blowing smoke up our asses like obama did? really?  ORDagnabbit   Dec-20-09 10:54 AM   #1 
  - Armstead, meet bedfellows  dave29   Dec-20-09 10:55 AM   #2 
  - strange ones?  Armstead   Dec-20-09 10:56 AM   #4 
     - sorry I have zero patience for the "all our Democrats are sellouts, except for my candidate" crowd.  dave29   Dec-20-09 11:02 AM   #11 
        - She wasn;t my candidate -- far from it  Armstead   Dec-20-09 11:03 AM   #19 
           - I was talking about your bedfellow.  dave29   Dec-20-09 11:07 AM   #30 
  - It was at least clear that Hilary understood the issue, she could explain  joeybee12   Dec-20-09 10:56 AM   #3 
  - "the issue is far beyond his intellectual capability (Obama)"  HughMoran   Dec-20-09 10:57 AM   #7 
  - DOes it matter anymore? n/t  joeybee12   Dec-20-09 11:02 AM   #14 
     - Does intelligent dialog matter any more?  HughMoran   Dec-20-09 11:04 AM   #21 
  - Obama just wanted something he could put his name on  paulk   Dec-20-09 11:07 AM   #29 
  - I know Obama blew smoke up our butts -- Clinton? Maybe, maybe not.  Armstead   Dec-20-09 10:57 AM   #6 
  - All that smoke in your ass hole cant be good.  MadBadger   Dec-20-09 11:05 AM   #25 
  - She was more above board than he was. Also after she got spanked on HCR in the  xultar   Dec-20-09 11:01 AM   #9 
     - Glad the primaries are over  HughMoran   Dec-20-09 11:03 AM   #18 
  - I bet Ben Nelson would never have tried that abortion rider on her.  dkf   Dec-20-09 10:57 AM   #5 
  - She would have fried his balls up nice and tender.  xultar   Dec-20-09 11:02 AM   #13 
     - really?  dave29   Dec-20-09 11:05 AM   #26 
        - Yeah, the same way she "fried" Gen. McChrystal on his 80K troop surge/10 yr. war plan. Oh... wait.  ClarkUSA   Dec-20-09 11:09 AM   #33 
  - And once it went to congress, she would have faced the same thing. CONGRESS makes the laws, not  RBInMaine   Dec-20-09 10:59 AM   #8 
  - I think she would have cracked some heads together much sooner  Armstead   Dec-20-09 11:02 AM   #12 
     - +10  xultar   Dec-20-09 11:03 AM   #15 
     - and he would have stood up and walked right away from the table.  dave29   Dec-20-09 11:07 AM   #28 
     - She would have backed the supporters of her plan too -- Big difference  Armstead   Dec-20-09 11:15 AM   #38 
     - I doubt it. What did she ever do in her Senate career would lead you to believe that?  ClarkUSA   Dec-20-09 11:22 AM   #43 
  - Of course, Hillary's plan never got to this stage of passage  thelordofhell   Dec-20-09 11:01 AM   #10 
  - I agree with you. I don't think Hillary would have been determined  intheozone   Dec-20-09 11:03 AM   #16 
  - Her AND Obama's health plans were better. This is what the Senate produced after the fact.  phleshdef   Dec-20-09 11:03 AM   #17 
  - Maybe, maybe not -- But she sure couldn't have done worse  Armstead   Dec-20-09 11:05 AM   #24 
  - and the result would have been the same or worse  Orangepeel   Dec-20-09 11:04 AM   #20 
  - Unfortunatly for her campaign,  kiva   Dec-20-09 11:05 AM   #22 
  - Everyone jump aboard the magic time machine  dave29   Dec-20-09 11:05 AM   #23 
  - ...  goldcanyonaz   Dec-20-09 11:06 AM   #27 
  - You honestly think it would of ended up decent after each congressmen demanded a reach around to vot  Oregone   Dec-20-09 11:09 AM   #31 
  - Hillary would not have caved in to the like of Lie-berman  leftofcool   Dec-20-09 11:09 AM   #32 
  - Details of how this would have been done?  treestar   Dec-20-09 11:10 AM   #34 
  - personally I think she would have used nunchucks and acid spit  dave29   Dec-20-09 11:13 AM   #36 
     - She might have  Armstead   Dec-20-09 11:16 AM   #40 
     - Maybe she has the naked pictures  treestar   Dec-20-09 11:23 AM   #44 
  - Hmm, the same way she "would not have caved in to the like of Lie-berman" on Kyl-Lieberman, right?  ClarkUSA   Dec-20-09 11:18 AM   #42 
  - If I were hiring someone to draft up a health plan Hillary Clinton would  saltpoint   Dec-20-09 11:12 AM   #35 
  - Oh man Bill Bradley. I love that man.  dave29   Dec-20-09 11:16 AM   #39 
     - Fair enough. But Bill Bradley should be far higher in the  saltpoint   Dec-20-09 11:17 AM   #41 
  - Okay, but you need to remember she would have come against the same  secondwind   Dec-20-09 11:14 AM   #37 
  - Because Hillary could magically wave her wand and bypass Congress  gravity   Dec-20-09 11:25 AM   #45 
  - Leaked memo: Re: (1) Bush (2) Hillary (3) Dennis  CJCRANE   Dec-20-09 11:25 AM   #46 
  - Locking  The empressof all   Dec-20-09 11:37 AM   #47 
  - Locking  The empressof all   Dec-20-09 11:40 AM   #48 
 
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. and you really think she wasnt blowing smoke up our asses like obama did? really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Armstead, meet bedfellows
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. strange ones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. sorry I have zero patience for the "all our Democrats are sellouts, except for my candidate" crowd.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. She wasn;t my candidate -- far from it
But I am having "buyers remorse" now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. I was talking about your bedfellow.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It was at least clear that Hilary understood the issue, she could explain
it in the debates...Obama never grasped the importance of HCR...he just threw out a plan because he had to...the issue is far beyond his intellectual capability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. "the issue is far beyond his intellectual capability (Obama)"
Do comments like this lead to constructive dialog?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. DOes it matter anymore? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Does intelligent dialog matter any more?
Do you think ridiculous hyperbole is what we should specialize in here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. Obama just wanted something he could put his name on
A political victory, blah, blah, blah.

With the majority we have (soon to be had), we should have gotten a much better bill than the piece of crap we will be getting. But that takes leadership and the willingness to fight for what you believe in. Obama believed in a bill he could put his name on and a place in the history books. What was in the bill was secondary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I know Obama blew smoke up our butts -- Clinton? Maybe, maybe not.
But I think she would have stuck to her guns much more. And her plan included important elements that Obama abandoned (or didn;t really support to begin with)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
25. All that smoke in your ass hole cant be good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. She was more above board than he was. Also after she got spanked on HCR in the
90's she wasn't about to let it happen again.

Everything you didn't like about her was already a known entity.
Everything everyone loved about Obama was media generated because he was basically an unknown entity. The Obama campaign allowed people to believe things that weren't true. Things like he was a progressive, that shit came from the blogesphere SMS they perpetuated the myth. Just like the myth that the Clintons were racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Glad the primaries are over
that was a stressful time here! Some still haven't moved on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. I bet Ben Nelson would never have tried that abortion rider on her.
But they'll do it to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. She would have fried his balls up nice and tender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. really?
ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. Yeah, the same way she "fried" Gen. McChrystal on his 80K troop surge/10 yr. war plan. Oh... wait.
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 11:11 AM by ClarkUSA
Sorry, she supported Gen. McChrystal's 80,000 troop surge/10 year war escalation plan and lobbied Pres. Obama to go with it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. And once it went to congress, she would have faced the same thing. CONGRESS makes the laws, not
the executive. That is why we COMPROMISE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I think she would have cracked some heads together much sooner
The deference to opponents to reform like Nelson is why tghis is such a piece of crap.

I think Hillary would have sat them down and said "support this or else."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. +10
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
28. and he would have stood up and walked right away from the table.
Who here responds to "support this or else" ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #28
38. She would have backed the supporters of her plan too -- Big difference
Obama let the people who supported his stated goals twisting in the wind while he threw his weight behind placating the likes of Nelson and the GOP "moderates."

His lack of back up to those who supported real reform is what ukltimately killed the good things in it.

I think Hillary would have bolstered the position of those who supported her stated goals and offered both some carrots with Nelson along with some sticks to whip him into line.

It;'s hypothetical at this point -- suffice it to say I think Obama either blew it, or didn't really want what he said he wanted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
43. I doubt it. What did she ever do in her Senate career would lead you to believe that?
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 11:24 AM by ClarkUSA
She was Ms. DLC Bipartisan throughout her years there, as I recall. She never took a controversial stand that I know of,
nor did she ever stand up on any contentious national issue during her entire time in the Senate. Quite the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
10. Of course, Hillary's plan never got to this stage of passage
So we'll never really know how badly it would have been gutted by Congress. So this is a moot point at best.

The question that should be asked is.....Did Obama ever consult with Hillary about health care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheozone Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
16. I agree with you. I don't think Hillary would have been determined
to have Repugs on board with her plan. I don't think she would have wasted all that time and energy trying to be bipartisan. She would not have allowed the Dems in Congress to give away to the Repugs the things that she really wanted in the bill.

I supported Hillary and I had a hidden hope that she, if elected, would not have minded getting a little retribution and taking a little revenge against the Repugs that hounded her and Bill for his entire 8 years in the WH. I was very sorry to see Obama win the primary.

I think this HCR bill is crap, they may as well rename it the Insurance Companies Profit Protection Act. It another Bush "socialize the cost, privatize the profits" piece of shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. Her AND Obama's health plans were better. This is what the Senate produced after the fact.
And if you think Hillary would have faired any better as far as keeping the Senate from handing back something just as badly watered down, then you are fooling yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Maybe, maybe not -- But she sure couldn't have done worse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. and the result would have been the same or worse
Their plans were very similar except for the mandate, which she supported and Obama opposed, so that certainly would have been the same.

My reverse crystal ball is on the fritz, but arguably, she would have had shorter coattails than Obama and we wouldn't even have a fake 60 votes in the Senate. In my opinion, a better bill would have passed the house and nothing would have happened in the Senate, resulting in nothing. I think Clinton probably learned lessons from 1993, but lessons can't overcome asshole Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
22. Unfortunatly for her campaign,
the specifics allowed her critics to attack her - "She would have mandates, OMG!!!!!!".

She may also have rolled over so eagerly for the corporations - seems to be a pre-existing condition for politician - but I'm pretty damn sure she wouldn't have spent almost a year trying everything to bring the Repugs on board. She already had a taste of what they can do, and I don't think she would have made that particular mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
23. Everyone jump aboard the magic time machine
It's time to re-fight the primaries again.

Honestly there was not a lot of difference in the plans. Hillary thought she could do it on the cheap though, which I always felt was a bit disingenuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
27. ...
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
31. You honestly think it would of ended up decent after each congressmen demanded a reach around to vot
Seriously? Everyone's gotta please their corporate master, or no dice. Hence...2000 pages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
32. Hillary would not have caved in to the like of Lie-berman
and she would have spit in repuke faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Details of how this would have been done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. personally I think she would have used nunchucks and acid spit
:O
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. She might have
In wouldn't put anything past her.

Which IMO would be a good thing, as long it is in line with what I wanted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #36
44. Maybe she has the naked pictures
She should share them with her boss - well maybe not. He is not the type to resort to that sort of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #32
42. Hmm, the same way she "would not have caved in to the like of Lie-berman" on Kyl-Lieberman, right?
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 11:20 AM by ClarkUSA
No... wait, she stood with Lieberman on Kyl-Lieberman and her husband held a big rally to campaign for Lieberman
against Ned Lamont in 2006:

"(AP) Bill Clinton, campaigning to save an old friend from defeat, appealed to Connecticut Democrats Monday to put
aside their opposition to the war in Iraq and send embattled Sen. Joseph Lieberman on his way to a new term in office."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/24/politics/main...

"Why is Bill Clinton campaigning for Lieberman? A friend running for Congress tells me it has everything to do with 2008,
Hillary, AIPAC, and Israel." http://www.alternet.org/blogs/themix/39425 /

Lieberman and the Clintons are DLC stalwarts and she never has stood up to Lieberman or any other Republican initiative
until she campaigned last year. In fact, during her years in the Senate, she was known for being Ms. Bipartisan, attending
weekly Christianist prayer groups with wingnuts and holding photo-ops with Newt Gingrich and getting to be good buddies
with John McCain, who she lavishly praised ad nauseum last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
35. If I were hiring someone to draft up a health plan Hillary Clinton would
not be among the first several thousand people on the list.

Bill Bradley would be first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. Oh man Bill Bradley. I love that man.
As silly as this OP is, I still would have talked to Hillary though, if nothing else for her perspective on 1993.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Fair enough. But Bill Bradley should be far higher in the
influence and impact game than he is.

I was a Bradley delegate from my state in 2000.

I still think he's the bee's knees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
37. Okay, but you need to remember she would have come against the same


assholes in the Senate that we have now.....(on both sides).......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
45. Because Hillary could magically wave her wand and bypass Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
46. Leaked memo: Re: (1) Bush (2) Hillary (3) Dennis
1) Compare Obama to Bush and say he's the same or worse
2) If that doesn't work compare him to Hillary and say Hillary would have been better
3) If that doesn't work compare him to Dennis Kucinich and say Dennis would have been better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The empressof all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
47. Locking
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 11:40 AM by The empressof all
Although we can see that speculating about the impact of a recreated history can be entertaining, discussions of these sorts are probably better in our fantasy group.....We'll never really know what coulda, shoulda, woulda except it's not helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The empressof all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
48. Locking
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 18th 2013, 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC