Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you support or oppose Obama's debt reduction plan, which includes the following provisions?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 08:47 AM
Original message
Poll question: Do you support or oppose Obama's debt reduction plan, which includes the following provisions?
Edited on Mon Sep-19-11 08:48 AM by jefferson_dem
— Letting the Bush tax cuts expire as scheduled on Dec. 31, 2012 for individual incomes above $200,000 and family incomes above $250,000. The total over 10 years: $800 billion;

— Limiting itemized deductions for the same incomes. Total over 10 years: $400 billion;

— Closing loopholes for oil and gas companies. Total: $40 billion;

— Raising taxes on investment fund managers. Total: $18 billion;

— Raising taxes on owners of corporate jets. Total: $3 billion;

— Reforming the tax system to make sure millionaires pay the same overall tax rate as the middle class.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/09/19/124505/obama-to-propose-31-trillion-tax.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_term=news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I do, but I wished they stopped to refer to millionaires when they
are taxing people with 1 million dollar income.

No need to frighten seniors with a nice house and stocks who happen to be millionaires because of that, but whose income is lower than $100,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Great point.
You know where there's any chance to frighten seniors the GOP will be all over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Push poll at it's worst. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Cognitive dissonance...
sucks, eh.

Psst... it's totally fine to say you like the President's proposal. Really it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. But, I don't like it.
Because of the things that weren't listed in the push poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Hmmm... I haven't consulted the Republican talking points yet.
Edited on Mon Sep-19-11 09:14 AM by jefferson_dem
I suspect they are vociferously opposing what's in the president's plan... er... this "push poll".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. What
Edited on Mon Sep-19-11 09:17 AM by ProSense
"But, I don't like it. Because of the things that weren't listed in the push poll."

...is it that you don't like, the payroll tax holiday?

What's the difference between the President's proposal and what Robert Reich proposed earlier this year:

<...>

And exempt the first $20,000 of income from payroll taxes.

Make up the revenues by increasing taxes
on incomes between $250,000 to $500,000 to 40 percent; between $500,000 and $5 million, to 50 percent; between $5 million and $15 million, to 60 percent; and anything over $15 million, to 70 percent.

And raise the ceiling on the portion of income subject to payroll taxes to $500,000.

It’s called progressive taxation.

<...>


<...>

For a while now, I’ve been saying that the simplest approach to the medium-term deficit would simply be for the president to say, “I will veto any bills that increase the deficit relative to the current law baseline.” There’s a virtue to simplicity. This proposal is considerably more complicated than my idea, but the complications overwhelmingly result from making the policy more leftwing than my proposal would have been. This would give us a much more progressive rate structure of the tax code, and trim federal health care programs in a thoughtful way. By the same token, there’s no real chance of implementing this idea. Yet as a statement of vision it sets up the contrast with the opposition quite clearly. House Republicans want to repeal Medicare in order to make tax cuts for the rich affordable, President Obama wants to tax the rich in order to make Medicare affordable. Some critics will focus on the relatively small changes to federal health care programs here, but the President is essentially doing what progressives have been urging him to do for months — abandoning the strategy of pre-compromising, and planting his flag in a way that draws strong contrasts.

link



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The poster doesn't like it...
because he doesn't like the President. Shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. I love the President.
I think he has done many great things.

That doesn't mean I'm going to cheer everything he does just because you tell me I should, or because he has a (D) next to his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. What's your point?
I don't agree with Robert Reich either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. The
"What's your point? I don't agree with Robert Reich either."

...point was a question: What is it that you don't like, the payroll tax holiday?

If you hate the entire plan because of the payroll tax holiday, so be it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. I support those ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. I support that plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. Doesn't go far enough. We need to eliminate subsidies to oil companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Um
"Doesn't go far enough. We need to eliminate subsidies to oil companies."

...from the OP "Closing loopholes for oil and gas companies. Total: $40 billion"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Closing the tax loopholes isn't enough. Why are we giving them subsidies?
Oil companies are making record profits. They can pay their fair share of taxes AND fund their exploration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
17. What more can I say?
The answer is YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC