Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Presidents have taken actions like Libya over 100 times in our nation's history

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
VeryConfused Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 08:07 AM
Original message
Presidents have taken actions like Libya over 100 times in our nation's history
with out Congressional authorization. That includes the Korean war

http://www.slate.com/id/2288869/pagenum/all/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. the isolationists have decided they are not worth helping..
Edited on Thu Jun-16-11 08:15 AM by meow mix
but will use any manufactured excuse to help ghadaffi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. An Authority from Bush-Cheney.
Really.

You've got to be kidding.

To justify Pres. Obama's warlord powers it has come to using the 'authority' of opinion from a Bush-Cheney employee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeryConfused Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Do you have a single supreme court justice
in the hundreds in our nation's history that supports your position?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Although I still think Dennis is nuts. It would be nice to have it proven in
court that not only is he nuts, but he is driven by demagoguery, not the Constitution. I'll take the word of the Constitutional Scholar & current POTUS, over that of the guy who claims to have seen a UFO. WTF is wrong with this dude? :shrug: One frivolous lawsuit after another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. ugh
hate to see this kind of thing on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Let's make a list of the "kinds of things we hate to see on DU".
This could take awhile. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnetteJacobs Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Unless the list is "the kinds of things every member hates to see on DU (all things in common)"
Then the list would be really short. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrossChris Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. It's helpful, if you think about it.
It brings a certain strand out of the woodworks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. You've been here a relatively short time, so I'll let that one pass.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
namahage Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. .
Edited on Thu Jun-16-11 12:10 PM by namahage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. +100
Edited on Thu Jun-16-11 02:45 PM by Phx_Dem
Dennis is a tool. It's hard think of our very limited, no boots on the ground supporting role in the Libyan "conflict" as a "war." I don't even think it rises to the level of "war' from a Libyan standpoint. It's an internal conflict/unrest in an effort to oust a dictator, not an all-out war.

Knock yourself out, Dennis.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Agreed. And need I remind this board just how "effective" the good Congressman has been...
in his nearly 8 terms in office? I can dig up the link if anyone wants to see it. It's a Hoot! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. And your point is ...
that Presidents are evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zacherystaylor Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. Presidents have never respected the Constitution
unless they had no choice.

Until we reform the election process they'll continue to do anything they can get away with if they think it is in their own best interest regardless of the constitution or the best interest of the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. Such ambiguity was part of the Founders plan.
When you create a government with 3 "co-equal" branches, your government will at times find itself trying to determine which branch controls a certain situation.

That Ambiguity was not an accident. The Ambiguity itself slows everything down. Which was the founders actual intent.

The founders distributed the powers, but they way they did it left lots of gaps.

Take the Iraq war. Congress never declared war, but instead GAVE their authority to Bush. If we want to get into a fun fight, I could argue that BUSH needed to be impeached, along with every member of Congress who voted YEA.

Our Constitution is intentionally vague. So that it can be interpreted in the time frame after the founders passed.

I think it was Sutter who said it was a "living document". I think that is correct.

How it applies today is different than it was 200 years ago, and the 2 branches get to stake out their positions every time a new situation arises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC