Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NBC poll: 80% said it was the right decision to kill bin Laden. "Justice was done."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 12:26 PM
Original message
NBC poll: 80% said it was the right decision to kill bin Laden. "Justice was done."
Edited on Mon May-09-11 12:28 PM by jefferson_dem
NBC poll: 80% said it was the right decision to kill bin Laden
By Mark Murray

In his interview on "60 Minutes," President Obama admitted he didn't lose any sleep over the possibility of taking out Osama bin Laden.

"Justice was done," Obama said. "And I think that anyone who would question that the perpetrator of mass murder on American soil didn't deserve what he got needs to have their head examined.”

It appears most of the American public agrees with him -- at least the part about taking out bin Laden.

According to a new NBC poll, 80 percent of Americans said it was the right decision to kill the al Qaeda leader versus capture him. Eleven percent said was the wrong decision, and 9 percent were not sure.

The NBC poll -- which will be released in full tonight at 6:30 pm ET -- was conducted May 5-7 of 800 adults (100 reached by cell phone), and it has a margin of error of plus-minus 3.5 percentage points.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/05/09/6612049-nbc-poll-80-said-it-was-the-right-decision-to-kill-bin-laden?ocid=twitter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. And the 11% are the people who will always hate everything Obama does.
Whether it's hatred from the left or the right.

I'll give credit for the people who are unsure that they have legitimate uncertainty and misgivings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I'm in the 80%, but still disappointed by Obama.
Will vote for him in 2012, but not work for him, as I did in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NavyDem Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. That 11% are also
those who believe that Bradley Manning is a hero from what I've seen on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. The same 20%....
would find a reason not to be happy if Obama found the cure to all cancers....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Just think of the population increase! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. 11% of the country are pacifists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. The 11% was probably pacifists mixed in with...
people who think everything President Obama does is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. They should have clarified this poll question....
Edited on Mon May-09-11 12:42 PM by Cali_Democrat
What if his capture and interrogation produced intelligence that could be used to prevent future terror attacks on the US? It would be interesting to see those response numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Rather than your hypothetical, they could've asked: Do you think that his capture and interrogation
would have produced intelligence that could be used to prevent future terror attacks on the US?

I suspect a very large majority would have answered that question in the negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. True
You're probably right about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Do you really think bin Laden would give away ANY intel about ANYTHING? And can you imagine
all of the problems there would be? Where should we keep him? Should we torture him? Is anything he said true? Please-he'd give up nothing and he'd do nothing but cause even more division.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. You raise some valid points
Capturing him, interrogating and then placing him on trial would be a major headache. There's a good chance our interrogators in the CIA and the Justice Department wouldn't have been able to extract valuable anti-terror information.

Placing him on trial would be a major headache. The justice process is extremely slow and messy, especially when it comes to terror suspects. Whether we try him in the ICC or in the US, it would be a circus.

Perhaps it's easier to not go through that process, kill the terrorist and dump his body in the ocean which is what was done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Lazier, not easier.
Consider the 'blind cleric'.

After the first World Trade Center bombing in February 1993, the FBI began to investigate Rahman and his followers more closely. With the assistance of an Egyptian informant wearing a listening device, the FBI managed to record Rahman issuing a fatwa encouraging acts of violence against US civilian targets, particularly in the New York and New Jersey metropolitan area. The most startling plan, the government charged, was to set off five bombs in 10 minutes, blowing up the United Nations, the Lincoln and Holland tunnels, the George Washington Bridge and a federal building housing the FBI. Government prosecutors showed videotapes of defendants mixing bomb ingredients in a garage before their arrest in 1993. Rahman was arrested on 24 June 1993, along with nine of his followers.<10> On 1 October 1995, he was convicted of seditious conspiracy, and in 1996 was sentenced to life in prison.

The dude was arrested just 4 months after the attack, and in less than 2 1/2 years was convicted of his crimes, a remarkably short time for such a complex case. That's hardly longer than the Amanda Knox case took.

That's how justice is supposed to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. What if they clarified that he died a swift but painful death thanks to the well placed bullet
Edited on Mon May-09-11 05:08 PM by jefferson_dem
to the chest and then to the head of a sharp-shooting NAVY seal? That might be helpful to some...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. and the 20%? Freepers, the PL on DU and John yoo... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Ditto....
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keith Bee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. 80%?
That's probably higher than here, based on some recent posts I've read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. That lead has two separate, different statements.
It might have been the right thing to do, but it wssn't "justice".

Justice requires a court, a trial, and a judgment by a person or persons vested with the legal authority to make a just decision.

This was vengeance, war, or a lynching - depending on your perspective - but it was NOT justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. +1. There were some things that this administration and the last
don't want the public to discuss, and a trial would have brought those things up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny2X2X Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. Why no Outrage
I don't understand why there is no outrage by what they found with Bin Laden. It is being called a Command Center for Al Qaeda now. We were lied to for years about how Bin Laden was no longer a threat and he shouldn't be worried about. He was in fact the biggest danger to America, by far our biggest threat. He was still running Al Qaeda and was still planning attacks against the US. I am outraged that we were lied to about our safety for so long.

The Bush Administration missed him in Tora Bora and then lied about his threat level to try to blunt their failure to get him. Sickening!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC