Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media establishment pronounces Obamas plan serious

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 08:30 PM
Original message
Edited on Thu Apr-14-11 08:31 PM by babylonsister
FWIW.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/medi...

Media establishment pronounces Obamas plan serious
By Greg Sargent

snip//

The Post editorial board praised Obama for an important and welcome contribution to the debate, and said the President is correct to call for new taxes. Joe Klein hailed Obamas sense of proportion and sanity. Marc Ambinders piece described Obama as reasonable and courageous. The Times editorial board pronounced Obama reinvigorated. Fareed Zakaria declared the speech important and serious. The Los Angeles Times editorial board said Obamas plan offered more concrete steps than the GOP did. Chris Cillizza pronounced the speech successful.

There are exceptions: Ron Fournier flirted with the notion that Obamas speech was overly political. Some news articles did describe it as partisan.

Its true that some of the above voices hailing Obamas performance are center left. But they represent an important chunk of the political media establishment. And the clear consensus among them was that Obamas speech was eloquent and effective, and that his proposal was yup serious. Some of them even hinted that Obamas plan is more serious than Ryans, if such a thing is possible.

Halperin and Politico are, if anything, in the minority. The important story here is that the Beltway media establishment by and large treated Obamas speech with real seriousness of purpose, and in so doing, ended up giving it pretty high marks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd like to know just why the President's speech shouldn't be partisan?
This is politics, after all.

And the Republicans have been sniping at him for years. Time they got some of that back, IMHO!

And it is a serious plan.

Recommended.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes it was a fine speech,
just like all the ones he made last time in campaign mode~

But I must ask, where's the beef?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug 31st 2016, 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC