Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Laughable Response To A Credible Proposal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 07:12 AM
Original message
A Laughable Response To A Credible Proposal
Posted w/permission.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/20...


A LAUGHABLE RESPONSE TO A CREDIBLE PROPOSAL.... It stood to reason that Republicans weren't going to respond well to President Obama's debt-reduction plan. It calls for higher taxes on millionaires and billionaires; it intends to scale back the massive and bloated Pentagon budget; and it wants to protect investments in areas like education and health care that the GOP disapproves of.

But those expectations notwithstanding, I'd hoped the House majority party would come up with a response slightly less ridiculous than this.

{House Republicans'} responses thus edged beyond substance into the realm of personal grievance. Indeed, they implied that the speech may have poisoned the well so much that working together where common ground exists might now be impossible. <...>

House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) attacked the partisan bent of the speech, then characterized it as "a political broadside from our campaigner in chief." <...>

After the press conference he suggested Social Security might not be doable anymore. "I was hoping Social Security and some budget controls, and I didn't even hear that," he said. "I was naively optimistic that the President was going to give us a sincere olive branch."


Ah yes, the anticipated "olive branch." This from the right-wing lawmaker who drew up a budget plan that "deliberately constructed to be as offensive to Democrats as it's possible to be," and didn't even bother with insincere "nods in the direction of bipartisanship."

The president presented a proposal that was entirely mainstream, and would have been considered palatable to the Republican Party before it descended deep into the fever swamp. Yesterday, however, this debt-reduction plan apparently hurt the GOP's feelings.

No, seriously. That's the state of the debate in 2011.


For his part, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said Ryan's radical plan "sets the bar," and will be the plan the GOP caucus sticks to.

Keep in mind, as recently as last week, Paul Ryan himself said he had no expectations that his budget plan would actually become law this year, but he's choosing to push it anyway as part of a larger ideological "cause." This week, however, the Speaker still considers the ridiculous proposal the only plan worth considering.

Obama said yesterday he envisions "a final agreement on a plan to reduce the deficit ... by the end of June." That's not going to happen. Call it a hunch.

Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. "fever swamp"
is a very good metaphor for how 99% of the Rs are behaving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. The President called the bluff of the Republicans collectively.
They claim the deficit and the budget are highly critical. But what they really mean is they want certain programs decimated and eventually retired and their constituents (read, wealthy contributors) "protected" (read, protected from taxation and regulation).

And the Republicans' idea of "working together" means Democrats capitulating to a political minority within a political minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. K & R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. "campaigner in chief"????
This from the party who applauded a President who held two wars so that he could win a second term on (often photo-shopped) military photo-ops and landing on an aircraft carrier (parked off the coast so that he could make the photo-op video) ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. once again, the republicans display the respect for the office of the presidency that they insist on
when a republican's in the office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. "...this debt-reduction plan apparently hurt the GOP's feelings."
ah... poor little goppers. }(

"The president presented a proposal that was entirely mainstream, and would have been considered palatable to the Republican Party before it descended deep into the fever swamp. Yesterday, however, this debt-reduction plan apparently hurt the GOP's feelings."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tweeternik Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. What Steve said.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Repukes are all suffering from Biff Tanner syndrome. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep 19th 2014, 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC