Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where are the jobs: More than 60 senators call on Obama to join deficit-reduction talks (updated)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 11:03 AM
Original message
Where are the jobs: More than 60 senators call on Obama to join deficit-reduction talks (updated)
Edited on Fri Mar-18-11 11:44 AM by ProSense

More than 60 senators call on Obama to join deficit-reduction talks

By Lori Montgomery

More than 60 senators from both parties are calling on President Obama to lead them in developing a comprehensive plan to rein in record budget deficits, a powerful sign of bipartisan willingness to abandon long-held positions on entitlement spending and taxes.

In a letter to be sent Friday to the White House, the senators urge Obama “to support a broad approach to solving our current budget problems” along the lines of recommendations issued last year by a presidentially appointed commission. That plan calls for sharp cuts in government spending, elimination or reduction of dozens of popular tax breaks and an overhaul of Social Security that would include raising the retirement age to 69 for today’s toddlers.

“While we may not agree with every aspect of the Commission’s recommendations, we believe that its work represents an important foundation to achieve meaningful progress on our debt,” the senators wrote. “By approaching these negotiations comprehensively, with a strong signal of support from you, we believe that we can achieve consensus on these important fiscal issues.”

The letter was drafted by Sens. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Mike Johanns (R-Neb.), who said in a conference call Friday with reporters that it took them only a couple of days to convince a super-majority of their colleagues to sign the letter.

more


This is what Congress is focused on instead of jobs.

Krugman: The Forgotten Millions

More than three years after we entered the worst economic slump since the 1930s, a strange and disturbing thing has happened to our political discourse: Washington has lost interest in the unemployed.

Jobs do get mentioned now and then — and a few political figures, notably Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leader in the House, are still trying to get some kind of action. But no jobs bills have been introduced in Congress, no job-creation plans have been advanced by the White House and all the policy focus seems to be on spending cuts.

So one-sixth of America’s workers — all those who can’t find any job or are stuck with part-time work when they want a full-time job — have, in effect, been abandoned.

It might not be so bad if the jobless could expect to find new employment fairly soon. But unemployment has become a trap, one that’s very difficult to escape. There are almost five times as many unemployed workers as there are job openings; the average unemployed worker has been jobless for 37 weeks, a post-World War II record.

<...>


Did these members of Congress listen to the President's press conference last week?

How many of them are going to rally around this: Kerry introduces BUILD Act to create a new American Infrastructure Bank

Bob Herbert: The Master Key

<...>

Senator Kerry will introduce legislation next week to create a federal infrastructure bank — officially, the American Infrastructure Financing Authority — to provide loans and loan guarantees to large, essential infrastructure projects. The loans will be seed money used to leverage other sources of funding.

“These are strictly loans — not grants — for commercially viable projects,” the senator said. “The federal government does no more than 50 percent of the loan. We expect that to leverage $600 billion or so in infrastructure investments over time.”

Mr. Kerry said the initial cost to the government would be $10 billion. Other proposals to establish an infrastructure bank have been more ambitious and more expensive. Senator Kerry is anticipating — or, at least, hoping for — bipartisan support and a nod from the Obama administration for this more modest initiative.

<...>

Creation of an infrastructure bank would be an important indication that leaders in Washington are still capable, despite most of the available evidence, of moving beyond partisan paralysis to engage one of the biggest challenges facing the country. If there is such a thing as a master key to a better American future, investment in the nation’s infrastructure would be it. That is the biggest potential source of jobs. That is how you build the foundation for new and innovative industries.

<...>


Congress needs to do its job and pass the President's 2011 and 2012 budgets, which includes infrastructure, job creation and other investments


Updated to add this from The Hill:

<...>

Republicans signing the letter:

Sens. Lamar Alexander (Tenn.), Kelly Ayotte (N.H.), John Barrasso (Wy.), Roy Blunt (Mo.), John Boozman (Ark.), Scott Brown (Mass.), Richard Burr (N.C.), Saxby Chambliss (Ga.), Dan Coats (Ind.), Tom Coburn (Okla.), Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), Bob Corker (Tenn.), John Cornyn (Tex.) Mike Crapo (Idaho), Mike Enzi (Wy.), Lindsay Graham (S.C.) John Hoeven (N.D.), Kay Bailey Hutchison (Tex.), Jim Inhofe (Okla.), Johnny Isakson (Ga.), Ron Johnson (Wis.), Mark Kirk (Ill.), Mike Lee (Utah), Jerry Moran (Kansas), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Rob Portman (Ohio), James Risch (Idaho), Pat Roberts (Kansas), Richard Shelby (Ala.), John Thune (S.D.) and Roger Wicker (Miss.).

Democrats signing the letter:

John Kerry (Mass.), Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), Ron Wyden (Ore.), Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.), Joseph Lieberman (Conn.), Kay Hagan (N.C.), Mark Begich (Ark.), Thomas Carper (Del.), Mark Udall (Colo.), Mark Pryor (Ark.), Dianne Feinstein (Caif.), Jon Tester (Mont.), Christopher Coons (Del.), Ben Nelson (Neb.), Claire McCaskill (Mo.), Bill Nelson (Fla.), Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Benjamin Cardin (Md.), Al Franken (Minn.), Mary Landrieu (La.) , Kent Conrad (N.D.) , Mark Warner (Va.), Richard Durbin (Ill.), Tom Harkin (Iowa), Herb Kohl (Wis.), Patty Murray (Wash.), Debbie Stabenow (Mich.), Jeff Bingaman (N.M.), Richard Blumenthal (Conn.), Tom Udall (N.M.) and Sherrod Brown (Ohio).

(emphasis added)

Senators Blumenthal and Brown are on Senator Sanders' Defend Social Security Caucus.

Are all these Senators going to support the BUILD Act, the President's budgets, the state waiver amendment to the health care law and raising the income cap on Social Security?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. NO to raising the retirement age. That is unnecessary and wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. All a deficit really is is a deferred tax rise. If he's not going to raise taxes the commission is
pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asphalt.jungle Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dear Mr President
Please provide us with cover. We know you will because you were born yesterday in Kenya.

Sincerely,

Sens. Lamar Alexander (Tenn.), Kelly Ayotte (N.H.), John Barrasso (Wy.), Roy Blunt (Mo.), John Boozman (Ark.), Scott Brown (Mass.), Richard Burr (N.C.), Saxby Chambliss (Ga.), Dan Coats (Ind.), Tom Coburn (Okla.), Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), Bob Corker (Tenn.), John Cornyn (Tex.) Mike Crapo (Idaho), Mike Enzi (Wy.), Lindsay Graham (S.C.) John Hoeven (N.D.), Kay Bailey Hutchison (Tex.), Jim Inhofe (Okla.), Johnny Isakson (Ga.), Ron Johnson (Wis.), Mark Kirk (Ill.), Mike Lee (Utah), Jerry Moran (Kansas), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Rob Portman (Ohio), James Risch (Idaho), Pat Roberts (Kansas), Richard Shelby (Ala.), John Thune (S.D.) and Roger Wicker (Miss.), John Kerry (Mass.), Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), Ron Wyden (Ore.), Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.), Joseph Lieberman (Conn.), Kay Hagan (N.C.), Mark Begich (Ark.), Thomas Carper (Del.), Mark Udall (Colo.), Mark Pryor (Ark.), Dianne Feinstein (Caif.), Jon Tester (Mont.), Christopher Coons (Del.), Ben Nelson (Neb.), Claire McCaskill (Mo.), Bill Nelson (Fla.), Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Benjamin Cardin (Md.), Al Franken (Minn.), Mary Landrieu (La.) , Kent Conrad (N.D.) , Mark Warner (Va.), Richard Durbin (Ill.), Tom Harkin (Iowa), Herb Kohl (Wis.), Patty Murray (Wash.), Debbie Stabenow (Mich.), Jeff Bingaman (N.M.), Richard Blumenthal (Conn.), Tom Udall (N.M.) and Sherrod Brown (Ohio).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. One way to get some insight on this is to listen to Kerry's floor speech
of a few weeks ago - where he does speak of entitlements. Social Security, per Kerry (and most people) is solvent for a long time - but Medicare and Medicaid aren't.

He also speaks of looking at revenue - he speaks of the fact that just as spending is at a high, revenue is at a low - both trends cause the deficit and both sides should be looked at.

Here is the link - (in 2 pieces http://www.c-spanvideo.org/videoLibrary/clip.php?appid=599660300 and http://www.c-spanvideo.org/videoLibrary/clip.php?appid=599660302 )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. They won't do anything to Medicare and Medicaid which leaves Social Security
This is not good for us at all.
via Digby:

"This is not looking good in my opinion. They are determined to push this and there is almost no energy directed toward cutting defense. Medicare is probably off the table because of the recent health care battle and the GOP's ruthless, hypocritical attack on Democrats. That leaves discretionary spending and Social Security, the issue which the country has been prepped to believe is going broke unless something is done."

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2011/03/gearing-up-for-grand-bargain.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

I tend to agree with her the only thing they will look at is SS. You can be sure Republicans will not be interested in raising the tax cap, even though it is the only sensible thing to do. The best way to handle SS would be for someone to introduce a bill and have it go through the SS committee and normal legislative channels. SS wrapped up in a deficit reduction package means it will be cut...that is the only logical outcome of lumping it into deficit talks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That is opinion of a commentator
That I often agree with her does not make this true. The fact is that MANY of the Senators have spoken on SS not needing big changes because it is solvent for decades - and the changes could make it solvent for this century (at least per Kerry)

I DO think they will look at Medicaid and Medicare - and they likely can find ways to lower the costs. They also are speaking tax reform and growing the economy - two things that digby does not mention.

By the way, there is no SS committee - the oversight in the Senate is the Finance committee - and it has a sub- committee, Subcommittee on Social Security, Pensions, and Family Policy - its chair is Debbie Stabanow. (link - http://finance.senate.gov/about/subcommittees/#ss )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Congress: a useless tool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why do we even have a Congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC