Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Laura Ingraham can see it...why can't some liberals?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:16 PM
Original message
If Laura Ingraham can see it...why can't some liberals?
Perhaps the biggest Obama hater in the media says this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_IR8u6RBr8#t=2m58s

It makes you wonder if some democrats actually want to WIN in 2012...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. You may be in the wrong place to expect to establish any credibility for your argument
with that source.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. lol its actually the best place...
If the political opponent is clearly worried about this from a strategic perspective...then doesn't that logically mean its a good thing for our side?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. There's the very real possibility that she's playing an angle. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. If Laura Ingraham is so smart
How come she's not a Liberal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. ....
:rofl: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Ain't that the truth! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. She just isn't smart enough,
that would require thinking on her part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. Burke Was No Dummy
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why would I want to agree with anything
Laura Ingraham would ever say? I am a Liberal, I will never, ever see things her way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. It should be making YOU take pause that some of the most
batshit insane individuals out there AGREE with Obama, one would think! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. No I actually want Dems to win in 2012
...thats why I like when the opponents are scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. in 2012 will there be a democrat running? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wait aminute - you're trying to shame us into being more like Laura "Fucking" Ingraham?!
:lol:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Nope...
...just highlighting that the other side realizes the political benefits Obama and the Dems get from this...while some on the left are too short-sighted to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Of course the other side loves the deal - lol! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Huh?...did you listen to the link?
some hate the f'king deal. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Sorry, I don't listen to Laura Fucking Ingraham - give me a break. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. You've got fucking Mitch fucking McConnell trying to whip up votes for it!
Doesn't that raise a red flag?

Or is it a white flag now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Governance is a game to you...
MY side vs THEIR side lol...you would've hated living in the early part of the century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
47. Oh, gee whiz, I better change my position
and support this Obama tax deal so Democrats are stronger come next election since, you know, Republicans made a big blunder. Now I can see how I was wrong and the president's position will make Democrats stronger in 2012. Laura Ingraham and Charles Krauthammer said so, I believe them, they would never mislead me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. How about Democratic strategists...
...would you believe them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. LOL! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
50. Do you really not get what the OP is saying? It is not that complicated. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 05:54 PM
Original message
Laura Ingram? Really? That was meant to persuade me? Nothing left to say but...unrec.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Oh dear, how could we be so foolish as to not see things the way Laura Ingraham does?!?!
Edited on Sun Dec-12-10 05:54 PM by polichick
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. Shouldn't you be watching Sarah Palin's Alaska about now????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. As a progressive liberal who was told to listen to that twit...
...I'd like my 6:26 back.

Are you kidding? Her argument is as stupid and vacuous as the same people who haven't done their civics homework.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. "who haven't done their civics homework"...
you mean like....some liberals? lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. Yes. Let's take advice from Laura Ingraham.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. I'm waiting to see what Pat Buchanan says.
The man's a true bellwether of liberal advances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. your wish is my command...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Not a good sign friendo.
If Pat likes it, we're definitely in the weeds here. A really good negotiation should have the enemy shrieking like you're pulling on their short hairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Its not about "liking it"...
...its just some strategists on both sides can see how this benefits Obama.

Isn't one of Obama's biggest criticisms that he doesn't play the political strategy game good enough...well he just did! lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I was hoping that it would benefit the 4 million 99ers.
You know, those people who don't have any money now? It's not going to be to Obama's benefit to have them in tents on the White House lawn. We're a little beyond parlor games here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Huh?...have you read the details of the deal???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Yes. And I kicked this up for people in here to read.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

The 99er's are getting nothing, no extension of tier 5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Whats your alternative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Letting the Bush tax cuts expire and extending UI benefits to the 99ers.
How's that sound? And before you step on my dick about votes, there's a great article in GDP about Jackie Speier. The White House has been calling her to approve the White House plan, even though she is against it. So if the WH has time to browbeat his side of the aisle, he could pick up the phone and squawk at the repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. tell that to the "vote against my interests" voters...
...that strengthened the repub's hand...there's no amount of "bully pulpiting" that will reach those folks. Or did you forget Nov. 2 happened?

All these "alternative ideas" should have been done BEFORE that date...can't expect Jordan to overcome a 20 point deficit with only 3 minutes left in the 4th quarter by himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Don't strain yourself moving the goalposts!
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 12:02 AM by Starry Messenger
Geeze, it wouldn't take that much! 4 million people denied benefits right before x-mas and now Obama owns this instead of the Repubs. Genius. :sarcasm: Instead we have a ghouls gallery of neocons telling the public that they agree with the Obama White House that the 99ers should eat shit and die. That should line people up to vote Dem. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Obama has no confidence in the electorate...
and after the mind-numbing idiocy and voting against their interests from them the past 2 years...he is completely justified! lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. lol!
Word salad. Just as I thought. lol! lol! lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Reality and facts are nonsense to you it seems. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. lol.
No, I just assume a basic level of knowledge from posters here. I'll just let you swim in the shallow end of the pool here and go back to the grown-up end. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. ok.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pecwae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. What?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. What...what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJGeek Donating Member (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
27. great point
obama played these suckers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. I think it's gone beyond being called "played" anymore.
It's what they wanted all along.

Otherwise why wait for a lame duck, and all the drama. I guess a photo op in Kabul was more important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
46. Unrecommended.
Right wing lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
49. um, uh, er, well, hmmmm...
this might be the most unintentionally funny post of the year. Kudos to you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 23rd 2014, 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC