Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The House is now voting to permanently extend middle class tax cuts. Passes 234-188!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:39 PM
Original message
The House is now voting to permanently extend middle class tax cuts. Passes 234-188!
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 03:57 PM by flpoljunkie
There were 20 No Democratic votes and 3 YES Republican votes--one evidently was talked out of his YES votes, as the number was four.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. keep us informed please nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Voting fast. So far 208 Ayes, 170 Nos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. So far, 102 Dems have voted NO, and 2 R's have voted YES.
Blue dogs, no doubt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. 13 Nay Dem votes right now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. it won't pass with 102 nos will it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yes, it will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ammonium Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. wat?
As of this moment only 13 dems have noted Nay with 205 voting Yea. 151 Republicans have voted Nay with only 2 voting Yea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would vote no against any PERMANENT tax policy
Taxes have to be flexible to meet specific situations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
58. I agree, but I'm not sure they mean permanent in the sense that they...
...can't be changed - just that this isn't a temporary move with a time frame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. 209 Ds + 2 Rs so far!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Getting close... 214 Ayes right now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. can they filibuster in the Senate or does the "trick" TMP reported avoid that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yes they can, unless Reid can figure some trick to use. Dems could also get strong on message and
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 03:49 PM by Parker CA
force some R's to vote publicly against middle-class cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. And it passed already! 218 Dems. + 3 Repubs. so far! n/t
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 03:47 PM by jenmito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yes, it has reached now reached 220! Four R's Yes, 16 Dems No! Shame on them!!!
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 03:48 PM by flpoljunkie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. 226 now! 4 Repubs.! n/t
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 03:49 PM by jenmito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. whoa, bipartisanship
hehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Hey-that counts! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Oops-one Repub. switched their vote to "no:-only 3 Repub. votes. But 230 Dem. votes. n/t
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 03:53 PM by jenmito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. 218! Passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. See Obama? That's how it's done! Thank you Nancy! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
68. I wish that there more Nancies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still a Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. Impossible
Democrats are too cowardly to put the GOP in a tight spot like this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. And yet we keep seeing posts about how Obama failed us on tax cuts
Go figure!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTD Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. He has. This is Pelosi working to obstruct his capitulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. To what did he capitulate?
Has he already vowed to veto this legislation? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Did he? What did I miss? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #33
50. No, he DIDN'T. That's the point! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #50
65. Oh. These days at DU one never knows. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. His point was that Obama is not against only extending tax cuts for the middle class. That's what
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 06:35 PM by jenmito
he WANTED, as he stated in several speeches in the past months/weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. I agree with your assessment. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. He failed?
So the rich have their tax cuts? Please explain. Thanks in advance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. So now we see if this was just symbolic or if there's going to be a push behind it.*
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
23. These same Blue Dogs who voted no profess to be so damn concerned about the deficit and debt.
They are major league hypocrites who do not deserve to be called Democrats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
57. Right you are! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. I expect a goalpost to be moved in three... twooooo...
ONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. So most of GOP didn't vote at all so they can say they didn't vote against it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. Virtually all of them voted no. nt
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 03:58 PM by Parker CA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. Cowards. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
44. How do you figure that most of the GOP didn't vote when only 13 members didn't vote?
435 members of Congress.

Vote on the bill: 234 - 188 (equals 422 votes cast).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. Kiss Medicare goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. We are doomed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. I don't understand... why is this stupid?
Also, why is it Obama's fault? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #48
53. and here . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #48
62. We had slushy rain in the area yesterday.....
it was Obama's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsCorleone Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #46
55. Yes, why is it stupid?
And, why the seemingly constant downer posts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
31. So about 190 House members just voted against the good of 98% of our country. UnAmerican a$$holes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Don't forget the 20 Dems who voted with him. No doubt, most if not all Blue Dogs.
Democrats who voted against this bill do not deserve to be called Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. They were included in the total when I was writing the post. Good for nothing Bluedogs supporting
the wealthiest 2%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
39. I would love to know who are the 3 republicans who voted for it.
They will be primaried by teabaggers next year, no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. For voting for tax cuts? Hehe. This is some funny shit going on here!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Ron Paul, Walter Jones and.....
.... we're still waiting on the names of the other two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. One reneged and voted No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #39
54. oddly enough, one is Ron Paul, the original tea bagger
That would put the tea party to the test, to primary Ron Paul or not?

There's a big long German word that starts with an "s" that I don't know how to spell but it's how I feel about the tea party on that question. I mean, didn't all of Ron Paul's ppl go over to the tea party? Wasn't that the original nucleus?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
40. Yay! Now on to Ben Nelson and Max Baucus to seal the deal!
.... whoops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnLover Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
43. No matter what happens with
these tax cuts, there are people here who will say that Obama somehow failed.

I liken it to a cop who already knows a suspect committed a crime, so he doesn't bother looking at any evidence to the contrary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #43
59. ok. so who are these people. Or are you just spewing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnLover Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #59
66. Some of them have already posted. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
47. You should hear Fox trying to spin this...
"This is why Nancy Pelosi is so unpopular! .... she's acting against the will of the majority of the people .... by ..... giving them a tax cut!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. They're lying, of course. The will of the majority of the people want exactly
what Nancy just passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsCorleone Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #47
61. Lol! Listening to Hannity radio: "watch Pelosi pass the largest tax increase in history" .
Lol!

This is why their followers are so damned clueless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
51. Roll Call
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsCorleone Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. Perfect! Thanks for posting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
60. Great news even though it will be blocked in the Senate
Everyone who joins a filibuster against middle class tax cuts but votes FOR tax cuts for the rich needs to have that decision as a permanent albatross around their necks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #60
69. put out some ads on TV telling people about this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
63. I have to say, once again, how much I admire Nancy Pelosi.
Apparently the lady has all the Democratic spines stored in her office. Bravo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #63
70. The GOP really hates her, because she is a very capable force...
she ought to give classes to Democrats in this administration.


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsCorleone Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
64. The RW are lying their asses off. See Darrell Issa's tweets regarding middle class tax cuts:
DarrellIssa @Jasoninthehouse is right. Why would anyone vote to raises taxes right now? (VIDEO: http://bit.ly/ggJ0SG) #tcot #GOP #taxfail
26 minutes ago

DarrellIssa On what planet do @HouseDemocrats spend most of their time? Didn't you all just vote Nov 2 to NOT raise taxes? #fail
about 1 hour ago

DarrellIssa Taxpayers are watching...RT @GOPLeader “yes” vote on Democrats’ tax bill rule before House this morning is a vote to raise taxes, kill jobs
about 7 hours ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
71. I said I'd be shocked if this happened. I am.
Wow. Let's see what happens with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC