|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:01 PM Original message |
Isn't it WAY past time to stop thinking the prez is naive or weak?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. you'll posted this spam in tons of threads today.... it needed an OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. It's a compilation, inspired by frustration - even Big Ed keeps calling the prez weak. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. "...even Big Ed..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I appreciate what he does, but want to scream lately. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. some call it scream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:59 PM Response to Reply #15 |
33. "others call it spam" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:47 PM Response to Reply #33 |
51. how many times must it be refuted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 09:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
64. ..and your put down of Ed's credibility is based on exactly what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndrewP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 11:10 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. People think he yells too much I guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:04 AM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Yes...There is a lot to yell about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yeah, here's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Yeah, perfect! He opened our waters to more drilling just days before the spill. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Is that what the current release is about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. Recommended., |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
18. I guess it's more acceptable to think of him as naive or weak. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ej510 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 06:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
61. Bingo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lob1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
6. I'm afraid you're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:23 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. It's something nobody wants to be right about - but how long are we supposed to keep pretending? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. If he's into maintaining the corporate status quo, who did ALL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. The last time Obama ran, they supported him. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. You have no valid answer, do you. Thanks for playing. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Sorry you can't handle the truth - thanks for dropping by. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. I thought she gave a valid answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
great white snark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:35 PM Response to Reply #21 |
47. Bullshit-you can't use what you don't own. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PufPuf23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 06:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
60. The instabilty in political dominance favors international corporations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
10. No it isn't. What it is: way past time to stop debating it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
13. So, what you mean to say is there is no difference between Barack and a Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. There are differences - Republicans don't care about tweaking things. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
50. so do you consider yourself a Democrat or a Green Voter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:52 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. I'm a liberal, currently Dem, who is interested in policies much more... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
20. Kick and Rec! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:58 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Just read THE MENDACITY OF HOPE by Roger Hodge... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
22. Yes, HCR=Status Quo, Financial Reform=Status Quo, CFPA=Status Quo, Lilly Leadbetter=Status Quo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:44 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. HRC left the insurance industry and big pharma better off than they were... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:45 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Bullshit, It's The Farthest Thing From Status Quo, Unless You Redefine Status Quo To Mean "Change" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:48 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. LOL- do we have gov't run universal healthcare or a mandate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:49 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Is The Government NOW For The First Time EVER Involved In Regulating Health Care? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:52 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Maintaining the corporate status quo means business as usual with... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. LOL! Oh, So Now Status Quo Means "A Bit Of Tweaking?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Your reading comprehension needs a little work. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:00 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. You Need To Address Me As "Yer Majesty!" Since I've Now Redefined "Beetwasher" To Mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:13 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. HAH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 05:53 PM Response to Reply #34 |
59. LOL! +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
23. Deleted message |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
32. Hey, you forgot to plug that book! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:03 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Haven't written it yet. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:04 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. You mean your name isn't Roger Hodge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:06 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Guess it's not only the teabaggers who thinking reading well-researched books is bad. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:11 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Nice strawman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:12 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. I've read a lot of books about our government lately - keep laughing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:13 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Congratulations on having a library card. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:25 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Try using a library card - you might have something worthwhile to add. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:29 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. I've had them most of my life and use them frequently. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:30 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Do your homework - I've posted about many books... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:32 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. My apologies for not keeping tabs on you 24/7, internet stranger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:34 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Still nothing worthwhile to add - even after reading so many books... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:38 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. I have posted about many books... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:41 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Face-to-face at... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:47 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. No, all over the place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 03:53 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. The name fits you. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 04:07 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Likewise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 04:12 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. This liberal has no problem with the word "chick" - but nice try. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
57. Oh goody - infighting amongst Democratic detractors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 05:00 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. LOL - I'm leaning toward Dem who likes the corporate structure. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
62. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
63. Of course you got it exactly right. His "historical accomplishments" consist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
65. YES and Hell Yes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
66. I think so too. If Obama doesn't think like the repubs he's obviously bought by the same people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
67. pretty much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-01-10 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
69. Well, I agree with your premise - that he is neither naive nor weak... and he is doing what he means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC