Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A third Question for 2010

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 02:45 PM
Original message
A third Question for 2010
If we govern in the middle, and truly reach out to repukes and conservadems and actually get some things. How many seats would we lose?

Not saying we should do that, but I am guessing we would lose very few seats. It is obviously a very heavy prices to pay on progressive legislation but until we get 65 or Senators and another 10 or 15 seats in the house. BlueDogs and RedDogs will hold tremendous power.

The midterms are going to be a referendum on the ability of the party of "Yes. we can" to actually get things done, far more than it is a ratification of the Party of No.

Personally... I want a permanent Democratic majority and would be willing to move incrementally to see that happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. The real question is
If we govern in the middle, and truly reach out to repukes and conservadems, what can we hope to actually get done? What actual progress can we hope to make if we are afraid to actually do anything?

It is my firm belief that if we actually had Democratic LEADERS enacting REAL POPULIST POLICIES,
you would see a major landslide for the Democratic party.

That is not what the Corporate Dems want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I note that you use the word Populist rather than Progressive
By any commonly held definition Populism is an appeal to what is going to float the boats of the muddled middle, rather than what progressive might favor. A populist legislative agenda does win. (That's what made the Contract with America and effective political device..damnable content aside0. A populist agenda can push the repukes to the fringe, if they object and marginalized the messaging if they support it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. The muddled middle of the population are not the top 1/2 of 1% that are currently being catered to.
My position is that by enacting populist policies you are by definition enacting progressive policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. You had two other questions?
That's it, no more questions until 2011.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. ...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. I take your point, but we are reaching out and we are governing from the middle
And we are probably going to get clobbered.


Whether we chose to govern from the middle, that's where we are.

Susan Collins effectively wrote the stimulus.

Joe Lieberman will effectively write HCR.

Since no pug, with the possible exception of the Maine ladies, will vote for anything at all in any scenario I honestly don't know how we could get more to the middle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I think we are getting clobbeered because we have allowed the GOPs to frame the debate
WDems have been punching bags. The argument that they are corporatist has never been enough because it makes us look like we hate businesses and arepro-governement. Our arguments, our voice, has never been resolutely acidic towards the GOP.

"The Mssaage" has never been What the Hell has the party of No done for you in the last 20 years?"

We get clobbered because The House is more liberal than the Senate, because Harry Reid does not come across as anything more than a pantiwaist. And the President has decided to let that process run its course/ He is not leading publicly on Healthcare.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seattle_blue Donating Member (299 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Republican accomplishments
I hate to do it, but I really have to give the republicans some credit. Here is a list of the Top 10 achievements that the republic party has accomplished for the betterment of the American people.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.

I know this list is not all inclusive: But you have to admit that they are really working very hard for the American people. Feel free to add any other treasures that the republic party has contributed to the American cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You Left out these three
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Thank you for composing that list
It was a lot of hard work and it is accurate! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. What good is a permanent Democratic majority when they continue to ignore the will of the people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
27inCali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. I agree to an extent.
as a party we should be focused on getting more done.


I'm ok with your strategy so long as it isn't applied to a jobs bill. The jobs bill should be all Dem ideas -stuff we know works, no more compromises, so when the unemployment numbers are dropping, even if only modestly by next Fall, the people will be thanking Dems.

JOBS JOBS JOBS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. We would have more so called moderate Dems. I live with Lieberman as my Senator.
The so called moderates are not worth it. Moderates...what will they call conservadems next, liberals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Exactly....
.... exactly what we are doing. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC