Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yes, Obama DID have some major achievements...so why didn't THE WHITE HOUSE get that message out?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:04 PM
Original message
Yes, Obama DID have some major achievements...so why didn't THE WHITE HOUSE get that message out?
Edited on Thu Nov-04-10 10:11 PM by Ken Burch
Why weren't there ads starting August 1st or so REMINDING people of what had been accomplished and discrediting the RW lies?

The prez and his staff have to man(and woman) up on that one.

In fact, not getting ANY message out this fall until two weeks before the vote probably did us more damage than anything else our party had control over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Also, where were the surrogates? Such a lack of people
out there on the MSM talking up the accomplishments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The surrogates were bashing them too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Actually I remember lots of surrogates on the news talking about accomplishments.
But I only watch MSNBC.

We can't do it 24/7 because we don't have our own network. The GOP has Faux and talk radio, they can do PR 24/7. The whole network is surrogates.

Even so, they were still there on Rachel and KO almost every day, doing the best they could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I flip over to CNN once in a while and never watch Fox (of course)
Forget daytime MSNBC - but we needed people out there from morning to night and I only really saw positive people on Keith and Rachel :shrug:.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Same reason Gore and Kerry didn't
I don't know how many times we have to play this out before it sinks in.

And by the way, the Blue Dogs who trashed the President's agenda and ran away from it are just as responsible. It's no wonder they lost, why the hell would anybody vote for them when all they said was how bad DC is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't for the life of me understand that. See the commercial below. It was brilliant
"campaign brilliant". I only saw this on the web. Shorter versions of these or similar personal stories like these should have flooded the airwaves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09hMdHF-PsU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's almost as if the prez is surrounded by people who undermine him?
I swear, never has there been worse PR for a president. It's almost as if planned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Every time some of us tried to list his achievements, we got nothing but derision... FROM LIBERALS!

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. I'm not talking about DU(and liberal/progressive disappointment was legitimate)
I'm talking about out among the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. This was about Change
There were some legislative victories, but nothing spectacular. No return of Glass-Steagall, no fundamental health care reform.

Most importantly, the average American feels no better off than they did on 1/20/2008. Not only are their lives more difficult, but Hope has flown out the window.

Working Americans are deeply unhappy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Where do messages get aired?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The DNC could have afforded tv ads listing the Obama accomplishments
and attacking the GOP lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Maybe they were kind of busy throwing money at the races for Midterms
Obama wasn't running, but I do see your point though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Getting the message out about what WAS done would have helped in the midterms.
This needs to be the last time our party runs a "lesser evil" campaign while the 'pugs run a "big values" campaign.

It NEVER works for us.

We need to defend OUR big values with the same passion they defend their with. Our big values are not terminally unpopular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I also think the responsiblity lies with campaigns
of those that were running. They could have ran those ads, equally as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganlush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. it was a conscious decision
...to avoid such ads because it would "nationalize" the election. They felt that since people who may hate the congress usually like their own congressperson, it would be better to keep the politics local, an let them associate their own rep. with local issues and not national issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Well, I hope the message gets through
that that will NEVER be the right decision again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganlush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. indeed.agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. Blue Dogs were sacrificed for HCR
& it was worth it IMO.

They were lost the minute they cast that vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnLover Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. Because they were drowned out by the Republican lie machine and
thought people in this country would recognize the wackos for what they are.

Apparently they overestimated the American public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. Obama didn't lose his seat.
What are the accomplishments of those who did lose their seats? I honestly don't know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. Because the Republican operatives inside the WH kept the focus
elsewhere? I do wonder sometimes if some of Obama's crew aren't in the enemy camp, deep undercover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganlush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
23. that's the frustrating part
Edited on Thu Nov-04-10 11:32 PM by veganlush
..most people don't know that the Obama tax cuts were the biggest tax cuts in history, for example. The stimulus total of 814 billion included over two hundred billion in tax cuts. So when the repugnants say that the stimulus failed, what are they saying about the effect of the largest tax cuts in history? And what would that acknowledgment mean for the ten year old bush tax cuts (smaller than Obama's tax cut)that obviously were an utter failure. The single biggest failing of the Democrats and the administration were that they weren't screaming these and other facts from the rooftops every time they opened their mouths.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chowder66 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
24. I heard the message
but trying to make people hear a message they refuse to hear is a fucking joke. The other side lives in some bizarre bubble.



It's like this...a guy runs YOU off the road for no reason known to mankind then flips YOU off for for no reason known to mankind.


Figur that one out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoseGaspar Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. Sorry, but whether something is a ...

..."major accomplishment" in politics is decided in real life and not by opinions on a political board. Less than a handful of Democratic candidates ran on Health Care or Stim or FinReg and they lost. The "major accomplishments" were enough to mobilize the right-wing to vote against them but not enough to pull the Democratic base out to vote for them. That is not a "major accomplishment"... that is failed triangulation. It is supposed to work the other way, even for the most cynical "pragmatists".

You can't dismiss that as a failure of communication.

You could argue that posterity will recognize what the ungrateful voters refuse to.... but that's not politics, either. That's just an attitude. I doubt that even Gibbs would take a stab at that.

As far as "two weeks before" goes... two weeks ago, Obama was still taking shots at FDR and saying that Summers did a "heck of a job".

That is a message, of sorts.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC