Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans can't be happy that Christine O'Donnell is their candidate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 06:04 PM
Original message
Republicans can't be happy that Christine O'Donnell is their candidate
Steve Benen

<...>

But even for a Senate candidate who's lied repeatedly about her educational background, is suspected of campaign embezzlement, is suspected of tax fraud, rejects modern science, hates gays, has crusaded against masturbation, has talked about stopping Americans from having sex, and embraces a hysterically extreme political worldview, this is pretty extraordinary.

Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.

O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.

She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.

"There's much I want to say," she said at the time. "I wish I wasn't privy to some of the classified information that I am privy to."

Note that this came from 2006. Some of the evidence of O'Donnell's nuttiness comes from the 1990s, which makes it at least slightly easier for her backers to dismiss as errors of youth. But in '06, O'Donnell was seeking a major-party nomination for the U.S. Senate, claiming to have access to "classified" information about a Chinese "strategic plan to take over America."

At a certain point, this stops being funny and starts being sad. I've long assumed that O'Donnell is just a ridiculous right-wing activist who managed to win a low-turnout primary. Given her delusional claims about access to classified Chinese intelligence, and her outlandish lies about her own educational background, I'm starting to think there may be something deeply wrong with Christine O'Donnell, which really isn't funny at all.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. She's an attention hound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did anyone provide the fact that if she had classified info that she would be subject to charges?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. She's the gift that keeps on giving
Not only did her primary win keep an existing Democratic Senate in seat in play (or better), but she has also become the GOP's poster child for what happens when overzealous Tea Party activists gain control of the Republican party. O'Donnell, Angle, Paul, Miller, et al are not good selling points for independents who may have leaned GOP but are also concerned that right-wing whackos are taking control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. My father, a PREVIOUS fan of Beck/Hannity/Limbaugh, is voting for Coons or writing in Castle
The lesson with this is that outsiders like the Tea Party and the Fox Snooze channel can sound great when it's not involved with hitting people like Mike Castle, who my father counts as a personal friend.

They destroyed Mike Castle, who despite some of his GOP embracing on some issues, was a moderate for the most part. And the O'Donnell's of the World have made my father want the Republican in the race to not only lose, but perhaps do time for crimes using campaign funds for personal gains.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. She may have received intell while fucking some Congressman...
The ol' honey trap, as they say in the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. At least she prevented him from masturbating
for a while, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Marble Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bless her pointy little head! She's going to cost the GOP the Delaware seat.
Those rabid right Tea Party-type primary winners are going to cost the GOP in Nevada and Kentucky, too. We hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. The only upside if the Tea Party crazies win is the entertainment value..
.. and that's going to get real old, real fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. They gave birth to O'Donnell and her ilk.
Now they want to abandon her.

Typical repukes............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. And this woman got a clearance for classified how ??????
She hasn't worked in YEARS and to my knowledge didn't hold a job that required clearance when she did have a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. They reap what the sow. The GOP encouraged the crazies and this is what you get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. So I'm wondering if she is privy to classified information
Edited on Mon Oct-04-10 08:37 PM by saltpoint
regarding the Chinese, are these Chinese-Chinese, as in people, or Chinese mice-with-human-brains-Chinese?

I'm guessing that if it's the mice, the Chinese mice have learned not only their own language, but can translate into English for any meatball-chomping morons they happen to encounter in the global espionage scheme.

And why has the WEEKLY WORLD NEWS done a cover story on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Professional campaigner, living off the spoils of her perpetual campaigning.
I'd say she's got some ethics issues. How anyone can still be a supporter, is nothing short of amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. At first I thought she might educate teabaggers about how nutty they are but I have my doubts now
it will sink in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well she's right about China
BUT! We gave them America under Bush, so they only need to collect the debt. I'm privy to info too. It's called real news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC