Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

K Street whines, feels it's being unfairly targeted by bill disclosing lobbying violators

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 07:32 PM
Original message
K Street whines, feels it's being unfairly targeted by bill disclosing lobbying violators

K Street feels it's being unfairly targeted by bill disclosing lobbying violators
By Kevin Bogardus - 08/01/10 04:14 PM ET


K Street is blaming the politics of the 2010 midterm elections for a new bill that would toughen lobbying law enforcement.

The House unanimously passed legislation last week that would disclose suspected violators of the Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) for the first time to the public. The bill would also set up a Justice Department taskforce to investigate those cases, likely upping the law’s lax enforcement.

It’s unclear whether the legislation will be approved by the Senate and reach President Obama’s desk, but the House vote nonetheless sends a tough message to K Street that lawmakers are interested in being seen as cracking down on lobbyists.

Lobbyists told The Hill that they had no issue with more enforcement of the law but bristled at the bill’s suggestion that their profession is inherently corrupt.

Tony Podesta, founder of the Podesta Group, said he thinks all lobbyists should follow the law and that his firm makes sure lobbying reports are filed on time.

“I hardly think it is one of the top law enforcement priorities. But it is an election year. You have to expect something like this to happen,” Podesta said.

more...

http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/112073-k-street-feels-its-being-unfairly-targeted-by-enforcement-bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. lobbyists would go out of business without a cooperative congress enabling them nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. it's a good thing they were not cooperative then, with this bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, fuck them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Considering that Obama hosted Billy Tauzin at the White House
and that the insurance industry wrote the HCR and Wall St. wrote the financial industry regulation laws, they should celebrating, not whining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You need a whambulance for your whining; sure you're not a
lobbyist? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. LOL what a load of hyperbole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think it's time to e-mail Tony Podesta and tell him that maybe it's time .............
to start making illegal lobbying practices a top priority. [email protected]
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. The law is a joke.
The simple fact remains - everything that gives lobbyists any more power than they should have in merely representing American citizens is derived from one of two places. The first is the ability to deliver campaign contributions, which is (unfortunately) perfectly legal. The second is through bribery, which is very illegal already.

I see no point to a law like this other than to make a meaningless political statement. Seriously, we don't need a law to disclose suspected violators of the LDA to the public - we have that power already and it's called a "subpoena" or an "indictment". They can - and have - been used regularly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC