Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Conason: The dubious Senate testimony of Jeff Sessions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 08:49 PM
Original message
Joe Conason: The dubious Senate testimony of Jeff Sessions
Edited on Wed Jun-30-10 08:55 PM by babylonsister
I :loveya: Joe Conason. POS Sessions, not even.

http://www.salon.com/news/jeff_sessions/index.html?stor...

The dubious Senate testimony of Jeff Sessions
The Alabama Republican says he doesn't believe Elena Kagan. But in 1986, it was his honesty that senators doubted
By Joe Conason


Whenever Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., insinuates that Elena Kagan is lying in her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee about military recruiting at Harvard Law School, it is worth recalling the dubious quality of his own testimony before the same committee when it rejected his nomination for a federal judgeship in 1986. At the time, to put it politely, he appeared insufficiently candid on certain crucial matters.

Of course everyone knows that the fundamental reason for the committee's decision to dump Sessions was his unreconstructed Deep South attitude, usually described in the oh-so-careful Washington lexicon as a "lack of racial sensitivity." Copious evidence included persuasive testimony from former colleagues who recalled his appalling remarks in private about the Klan (he liked them until he learned that some Klansmen were "pot smokers"), the NAACP ("un-American" and "Communist-inspired") and the American Civil Liberties Union (also "un-American" and "Communist-inspired"). He had castigated a white lawyer who fought for equal voting rights as "a disgrace to his race" and repeatedly called a black assistant U.S. attorney "boy," warning him to "be careful what you say around white people."

The squalid legal career of Sessions, who had misused his power as U.S. attorney to protect Alabama's racist political machinery, was thoroughly examined in 2002 by the New Republic's Sarah Wildman. She reported that Sessions admitted making some of the ugly remarks and denied others, but dismissed them all as mere joking. But Thomas Figures, the black former U.S. attorney who had worked for Sessions, was not amused:

Sessions, he said, had called him "boy" and, after overhearing him chastise a secretary, warned him to "be careful what you say to white folks." Figures {said} ... he too had heard Sessions call various civil rights organizations, including the National Council of Churches and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, "un-American." Sessions denied the accusations but again admitted to frequently joking in an off-color sort of way.


While Sessions acknowledged that some of the allegations were true -- including the ugly "disgrace to his race" comment -- he denied calling Figures "boy." But Sen. Howard Metzenbaum, D-Ohio, since deceased, said publicly that he didn't believe Sessions. The nominee had "changed his statements" from one hearing to another, complained Metzenbaum, because "he fully understood that these statements might cost him his judgeship." According to the Ohio Democrat, Sessions revised his story about the "disgrace" slur in particular: "Once he said he said it, once he said he didn't recall saying it, and once he said he didn't say it ... This is a man who is hostile to civil rights organizations and their causes."

Sessions firmly insisted that he was wholly unprejudiced and guilty only of jesting too freely. But Alabama Democrat Howell Heflin, who had initially supported the nomination, ultimately voted no after hearing all the testimony, presumably because he felt that the nominee had been untruthful about himself and his past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. The poor thing is finding out he has called attention to HIMSELF...AND WITH IT, THE MICROSCOPE
as they say in Hawaii

AUWE AUWE KANE'PILAU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeabbut, in my best 3 Stooges voice, people like Sessions! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Klan called, they want their elf back.
Thank you for reminding us why Beauregard should never be allowed to judge anything in a free society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. And why is this bad now, on DU? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-01-10 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thank goodness he was denied judgeship!!
What a lying racist POS! I will never understand racism, period. What makes a person think they are better than someone else because of the color of their skin? What a disgraceful, hateful excuse for a human being!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Sep 21st 2014, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC