Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The media and chattering classes are busy creating their own reality of the Obama administration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 11:45 PM
Original message
The media and chattering classes are busy creating their own reality of the Obama administration
Edited on Sun Jun-06-10 12:12 PM by undergroundrailroad

First "Obama's Katrina," Now "Obama's Watergate"

It appears that the Republican Party and the conservative chattering classes are determined to identify Barack Obama with every famous conservative disaster of recent history. BP's Gulf Oil spill, we are told incessantly, is "Obama's Katrina," presumably because of the common geographic location, and now we hear that the silly, contrived "scandal" over alleged job offers to Democratic primary candidates will be "Obama's Watergate." What's next: Obama's Iraq? Obama's U.S. Attorney Scandal? Obama's Plamegate? Obama's Illegitimate Election? (Oh, sorry, I forgot, Republicans have already used that one!).

In any event, the "Watergate" analogy is insane, unless maybe you are too young or too poorly read to remember what Watergate entailed. As Joe Conason explains at Salon:

"Watergate" was the place where the president's henchmen staged a "third-rate burglary" of the Democratic National Committee headquarters on a June night in 1972, but its historical definition is the vast gangsterism of the Nixon regime. Watergate involved no political job offers, but a series of burglaries, warrantless domestic wiretaps, illegal spying, campaign dirty tricks, and assorted acts of thuggery by a group of goons whose leaders included G. Gordon Liddy and the late E. Howard Hunt. Watergate meant a coverup of those felonies with more felonies, set up by lawyers and bureaucrats who collected cash payoffs from major corporations and then handed out hush money and secret campaign slush funds. Watergate implicated dozens of perps, from Hunt and Liddy all the way up to the president, his palace guard, and his crooked minions at the highest levels of the Justice Department, the FBI and the CIA.

The allegations against the White House today involve alleged discussions of administration jobs for Democrats running in two Democratic primaries, who turned them down without consequences. Does that sound like Watergate in any way, shape or form?

But that even assumes there was anything wrong with the discussions, other than their political clumsiness. Yes, one defense is that the same thing has been done by federal, state and local executives from time immemorial, but even that concedes too much to the critics. The federal statute being invoked by conservatives in this situation makes it a crime to offer a job in exchange for "a political act." But in this case, "the political act" is simply taking the job. If that's illegal, then it's illegal to offer appointments to anyone who is or might be running for office.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. "when the president is criticized, the terrorists win"
Some random Bush supporter in 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hit that one outta the park
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. If you don't push your own narrative, one will be created for you!
Edited on Sat Jun-05-10 12:37 AM by depakid
In this case, the obvious narrative was preemptively destroyed by the decision to adopt Republican drilling policies, without having the regulatory house in order.

That left the administration's natural allies disillusioned, unengaged on their behalf and on the sidelines while the other media narratives were being propagated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. This misses the entire point of the OP, which is:
"The administration has a lot to deal with, but one thing it cannot focus on is the 24/7 baseless media reports. If there was a department focused on addressing bogus media reports, it would like be accused of censorship or propaganda.

So a lot of what the media pundits spit out becomes de facto reality. Of course, "Obama's Watergate" doesn't qualify because it's beyond silly."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. No- the point is that the media is what it is- and if the administration (or any candidate)
doesn't -or cannot- proactively shape the dynamics- then they'll get shaped themselves.

Another set of points about that of course involves media regulation- though that's better left to another thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. "cannot- proactively shape the dynamics" Not the point.
Edited on Sat Jun-05-10 01:42 AM by ProSense
The administration cannot address the media's insistence on sticking to their talking points. It's not like they don't have the facts. They choose to make these analogies and pass them off as critical analysis. Saying that they are creating their own reality, doesn't mean they're being effective.

Also, "media regulation," to address talking points?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's the exact point- the administration hasn't much narrative to offer
Edited on Sat Jun-05-10 02:18 AM by depakid
It's been the proverbial "by the wind sailor"

And consequently among the casualties of the oil spill.


Velella, common name: By the Wind Sailor

May 11, 2010 Oil spill science: The jellyfish graveyard

...Here at MC118 we found much more of the dispersed oil and occasional clumps of thick, gooey, intact oil. Beyond that the most striking thing is the presence of countless small dead jellyfishes known as by-the-wind sailors, or Velella vellela, and known to be susceptible to oil. Normally these animals, about the size of two fingers together, are blue and float on the surface with a triangular sail rising above the water t. But those we see here are transparent and floating upside down, many stained with oil.

After finishing here late tonight, we'll move nearby to drop a device called the high-frequency acoustic recording package, or HARP, to the seafloor, about 1600metres below. There it will sit and record marine mammal sounds in the region before retrieval by other researchers a few months from now....

More: http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2010/05/oil...


These folks -and many more were the candidate's staunchest and most enthusiastic allies. Now of course- begrudgingly and not so much.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Given the examples in the OP, let's look at some of the media/RW talking points
Obama's birth certificate. Obama is a Muslim. Obama was born in Kenya.

Yes all of that creeps into the media, albeit mostly via Fox. What should his response be?

No the response isn't the point.

The point is, as stated in the OP: The administration has a lot to deal with, but one thing it cannot focus on is the 24/7 baseless media reports. If there was a department focused on addressing bogus media reports, it would like be accused of censorship or propaganda.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. It does have "Fight The Smears"..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. The chattering classes
are so useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Class: the talking point today is Blame the Media.
OK, OK we get it. It's all the media's fault. Enough already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. No, it's not the media's fault. It's never the media's fault.
The media can't make people gullible. They just put the stuff out there. They're not forcing anyone to believe it.

Why should anyone expect the news media to be unbiased?








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep 16th 2014, 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC