Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Krugman: Idiot-Proofing Financial Regulation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:36 PM
Original message
Krugman: Idiot-Proofing Financial Regulation

Idiot-Proofing Financial Regulation

Ezra Klein expresses some skepticism about my skepticism. I worried that no financial reform will work if the government is dominated by people who don’t believe in regulation; Ezra counters that the FDIC has been pretty robust to idiots in power.

Actually, we’re both right.

The New Deal system of financial regulation really had two main parts: deposit insurance and bank capital requirements. The first ruled out bank runs; the second reduced the incentive for banks to take advantage of guarantees to gamble with other peoples’ money. The capital requirements actually worked better than they really should have, because of a third factor: limited competition meant that banks had a large franchise value, which they were reluctant to endanger.

This whole system was fairly idiot-proof. Not totally: when Reagan-era legislators decided to avoid covering losses at S&Ls by deregulating their investments, hoping that they would earn their way out of the hole, the result was a disaster. But all in all the system didn’t require smart or even especially competent leadership.

But the old system faced a relatively simple task: regulating and insuring depository institutions. We knew what banks were, and we knew what undue risks looked like.

Now the problem is regulating shadow banking — non-depository banking. So right from the beginning we have the problem of deciding what is a bank, and what liabilities need deposit-type guarantees. All short-term debt? Only some kinds of repo? Who do we need to be worried about?

link



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asphalt.jungle Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. i love the quotes in post #4
These words of wisdom seem pertinent (from http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?IdiotProofProcess):

"It is impossible to make anything foolproof, because fools are so ingenious." -- Robert Heinlein

"Those who try to build idiot-proof systems always underestimate the persistence and ingenuity of idiots." -- anon

"If you make your system more idiot-proof, the idiots will build a bigger/better idiot." -- anon

"You can make something foolproof, but not damnfoolproof." -- anon

"Campaigns to bearproof all garbage containers in wild areas have been difficult because, as one biologist put it, 'There is a considerable overlap between the intelligence levels of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists'."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC