Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Confused by Obama cozying up to corporate scammers? Read up on the DLC:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 12:12 PM
Original message
Confused by Obama cozying up to corporate scammers? Read up on the DLC:
Their stated goal is to replace traditional Democratic constituencies of unions, minorities, and progressives, with corporations, banks, and Wall Street.

At one point, http://www.blackcommentator.com/48/48_cover.html">Obama realized the group was repugnant enough to Democratic voters that he asked the DLC to remove his name from their website and said he was not a member


“I am not currently, nor have I ever been, a member of the DLC,”
said Obama, in a statement that substantially reflects a telephone conversation with Associate Editor Bruce Dixon, this weekend.
“It does appear that, without my knowledge, the DLC…listed me in their ‘New Democrat’ directory,” Obama continued. “Because I agree that such a directory implies membership, I will be calling the DLC to have my name removed, and appreciate your having brought this fact to my attention.”

http://www.blackcommentator.com/48/48_cover.html


That has since proved to be disingenuous to put it mildly since with one or two exceptions (one progressive and one republican) his cabinet is composed entirely of DLCers and those the DLC actually works for like Larry Summers and Robert Rubin.

Here's an excerpt from one of the best articles on them, followed by some other links:

The American Prospect
How the DLC Does It
by Robert Dreyfuss



Representative Gregory Meeks, an African-American lawyer and assistant district attorney elected to Congress in 1998 to represent a middle-class black neighborhood in Queens, New York, was undecided last year on the divisive issue of trade rights for China. Lobbyists for big business were battling the AFL-CIO and environmental groups on Capitol Hill for every vote, and Meeks, who'd previously voted against granting fast-track negotiating authority to President Clinton, was a prize.

Sensing an opportunity, Representative Cal Dooley, a moderate California Democrat closely allied with that state's high-tech sector, moved in. As co-chairman of the House New Democrat Coalition, a bloc allied with the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), Dooley was targeting fence-sitters to vote aye. Along with fellow New Democrats Harold Ford, Jr., of Tennessee and Bob Matsui of California, Dooley hooked Meeks up with a stream of corporate officials from Silicon Valley and the New York financial district. "My boss made sure there'd be support for Meeks from the business community," says a Dooley aide. "He spread the word, through groups like the Business Roundtable, that here was a guy who deserved their support."

"Congressman Dooley helped bring in businesses who otherwise Congressman Meeks would not have known, and didn't have a relationship with, to knock on his door. As a result, scores of meetings were held with the congressman," says an aide to Meeks, citing sit-downs with the CEOs of American Airlines and New York Life Insurance Company. High-tech executives helped ensure that Meeks would be one of two undecided members to accompany President Clinton on his high-profile trip to China before the vote, the aide said; and Meeks also won significant backing from industry political action committees, which ended up nearly matching labor's donations to Meeks's campaign treasury. Included were $5,000 PAC contributions from American Airlines and New York Life. And in the end, Meeks voted business's way.

The DLC's effort to win Meeks's vote was part of a vigorous campaign by New Democrats to assure legislators that business groups would replace campaign contributions from labor lost by a pro-business China vote. In The New Democrat, the DLC's monthly magazine, Washington's most powerful business lobbyist, Thomas J. Donohue of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, wrote that even though some members of Congress risked losing the AFL-CIO's support, "business will stick by Democrats on the China trade vote."

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=how_the_dlc_does_it


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2973191

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/the-democrats-2008-choice_b_4729.html

http://www.nndb.com/group/269/000093987/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/the-democrats-2008-choice_b_4729.html

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050103/sirota
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ooh Boy!
:scared:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. DLC.. isnt that the Clinton people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. there's a lot of Clinton retreads in Obama's cabinet and policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Yes.
Funny thing is that one of the reasons I went for Obama was so they wouldn't be in charge. The joke was on me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Ha!
The sole reason I went with O is because he wasn't McCain and he wasn't Clinton -- I knew exactly what I would be getting with the both of them.

Comes time for O staffing and appointments to come along and -- whaaa?? -- it's like The Clinton Years, Part II. :wow:

Fool me once...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. The DLC -- the Corporate Cancer on the Democratic Party.
From its inception, its purpose was to free the Party from the traditional Dem constituents of labor, women, blacks, and environmentalists so that the Party could vie for the tons of corporate cash the GOP had been hauling in -- and winning with. Rahm Emmanuel, Mr. Victory At Any Cost, was instrumental in this new push.

It has been downhill from there -- the DLC Cancer brought us NAFTA, the repeal of Glass-Stiegle, "Most Favored Nation" trading status with China, and The Blue Dogs/New Dems.

Thanks bunchs, fellas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Run for the hills...!
Not the ... the ... the ... DLC!

:scared:







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. is that Van Gogh in the public domain? if not, do you have permission?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. No Van Gough, no man, no....
No Vincent in that post. Guess again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. !!!11!!11!
oh noes! more anti-obama propaganda!11111!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Please take a look at the man in your avatar.
If you think for one hot second he would have anything to do with the modern day DLC and its idealogy, you're batshit insane.

Seriously, your admiration for Obama is blinding you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. All of RFK's kin supported prez O, including his children, his wife and his brother....
Edited on Thu Mar-04-10 10:37 PM by FrenchieCat
so perhaps you are just talking,
but don't know what really about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demhistorian Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. there stated goal? Where specifically is that stated?
Honestly, if you're going to throw that out there, why not a link to go along with you other retread links?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC