Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Krugman: Waiting on HCR wouldn't have helped the economy any

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 11:35 AM
Original message
Krugman: Waiting on HCR wouldn't have helped the economy any

Paul Krugman
January 24, 2010, 3:17 pm
The Phantom Policy Conflict

The idea that Obama made a mistake by focusing on health care instead of the economy seems to be catching on on the left as well as on the right. But my question remains: what are we talking about, specifically?

There was a window early last year when Obama could have pushed for a bigger stimulus and could have pushed for a major recapitalization of the banks with public funds, so as to encourage more lending; that recapitalization would probably have required nationalizing a couple of institutions. At the time, the administration wasnt at all focused on health care, which it was leaving largely up to Max Baucus.

But Obama didnt do that. And ever since, its been hard for me to see what options are left.

Maybe, maybe, a relatively small job-creation program could have been pushed through this fall. And maybe, if it had been sufficiently unorthodox say, a job-creation tax credit it might have had enough bang for the buck to make a noticeable difference.

But aside from that, what? We could have had a lot of speeches about the economy. Would that have helped, absent a policy to make things better?

In my view, there are two defensible hypotheses:

1. Obama was doomed to have a bad economy regardless.

2. He missed a key window, early on, back when some of us were screaming at him to go bigger; but that window closed by the summer of 2009.

Either way, I dont see how punting on health care would have helped.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/24/the-phantom... /
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Health Care Reform could have been the perfect economic stimulus.
Single Payer Universal Health Care (Medicare for all) would have relieved everyone of some financial burden. And instead of the top-down corporate bailout approach, this would have provided a bottom-up stimulus. And it could have been done with no increase in overall per capita health care spending.

Obama should have gone for exactly this, and he should have taken a strong message to the people who are mostly unaware to this day of the scenario I have just described.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep 16th 2014, 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC