Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

POLL: CO-Sen, CO-Gov: No Clear Front-runners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 12:00 PM
Original message
POLL: CO-Sen, CO-Gov: No Clear Front-runners
CO-Sen, CO-Gov: No Clear Front-runners

CO-Sen, CO-Gov: No Clear Front-runners
by mcjoan
Mon Jan 18, 2010 at 08:00:04 AM PST
Our latest poll from Research 2000 in Colorado shows tight races in the early going for both the senate and governor seats, and a general "meh" towards all candidates in both races--no one breaks the 50 percent threshold.

That said, Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper's decision to run for governor seems to give the Dems the best chance at retaining the seat. He's tied with the Republican leader, former Congressman Scott McInnis at 43, whereas other potential candidates Ken Salazar (who decided not to run late last week), Colorado House speaker Andrew Romanoff, and Rep. Ed Perlmutter all trail McInnis, Salazar by 2, Romanoff by 5, and Perlmutter by 8.

Beyond our numbers, Hickenlooper is regarded as the strongest candidate within the state, and has Republicans worried.

From former Rep. Bob Beauprez in The Colorado Statesman last February:

I'm guessing John Hickenlooper has name ID that rivals the governor's, maybe exceeds the governor's. I'm guessing that John Hickenlooper has 4:1 favorable/unfavorables statewide. There isn't enough money in the world to peel that down to 1:1 - to where you could maybe beat him.

John Hickenlooper could claim - he won't do it because he's got enough humility to not do it - but he could claim that the DNC was successful in large part because of his efforts to raise the money. He not only has a Rolodex with names in it, they are successful names.

John could raise more money and be more easily elected. His appointment would have taken that seat almost completely off the table. I don't know what John could have done to make it truly competitive.

Here's what Wadhams had to say about Hickenlooper in December 2008, when Hick was being considered as a replacement in the U.S. Senate for Ken Salazar:

Dick Wadhams, the state GOP chairman, conceded that Hickenlooper "is immensely popular as the mayor of Denver" but said "he'll look a lot different after two years of votes in the U.S. Senate."

On the Senate side, Romanoff is running a primary challenge to Sen. Mike Bennet that has yet to gain much steam. There's been speculation that he'd switch races, and run for Governor, but Hickenlooper's entrance in the race makes that unlikely. Bennet is in a statistical dead heat with likely Republican challenger (and tea party courter) Jane Norton, former lieutenant governor. He has just a one point advantage, with Romanoff trailing Norton by two.

With none of the frontrunners in either position running above 43 (and Obama at 46 favorable), Colorado is definitely in swing state territory again this round. Note that the polling was completed before Hickenlooper's announced decision to enter the race, which might have given him another point or two.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/1/18/825383/-CO-Sen,-CO-Gov:-No-Clear-Front-runners
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hickenlooper is a good guy and has been a good mayor
I have been in Denver many times. It is a beautiful city, with a strong LGBT community, and have many friends there and in Conifer.



http://admin.denvergov.org/Default.aspx?alias=admin.denvergov.org/mayor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC