Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Getting Smart About Cuba

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:21 AM
Original message
Getting Smart About Cuba
Getting Smart About Cuba
http://www.alternet.org/audits/79264/
The announcement of Fidel Castro's retirement and the subsequent election of his brother Raul Castro as Cuba's new president came as no surprise to Cuba experts and certainly not to the Cuban people themselves. Most Americans, though, seemed to expect that the passing of Castro -- however it should happen -- would be a convulsive event for Cuba. Instead, the changes happened peacefully and quietly, illustrating how U.S. perceptions of Cuba are, in general, painfully ignorant. It's time we recognized why.

The fact that Cuba holds non-compulsory elections every five years, in which approximately 95% of Cubans vote, may surprise many Americans. While some may dismiss this systematic practice of political participation as a sham, others recognize the grassroots discussions that do occur in Cuba through a vast, deep network of community and religious groups, block associations and other "organizations of the masses." Whatever one's point of view, events of the past days indicate that the Cuban people have readily and peacefully accepted the results of these elections and are ready to move on.

Others are not ready to move on.

Hardliners

Similar to what happened with Iraq, where a disgruntled contingent of an exile community spun its own "intelligence" that helped lead us down the path of war, through Democratic and Republican administrations alike, the United States has allowed and underwritten a wealthy, politically entrenched subset of hardline, pro-embargo Cuban-Americans to determine policy despite the best interests of much larger sectors of the population.

While Cuba evolves, U.S. policy will remain static as long as this special interest group sets the terms by which any opening can occur. These hardliners know U.S. ultimatums will never work to bring change to Cuba; they don't expect them to. The hardliners' goal is to punish the perpetrators of the Cuban revolution and create the chaos and institutional breakdown in Cuba that might allow them to regain a foothold on the lost island of their fantasies.

It's curious that the policy of our nation is set by members of Congress who have never set foot on the island, and Cuban-Americans who fled a civil war for the safety of U.S. shores so long ago.

The United States has, in part, been unwittingly ensconced in a small-time family-feud with Fidel Castro. After all, the father of two members of the U.S. House of Representatives from Florida -- Republicans Lincoln Diaz Balart and Mario Diaz Balart -- was a close cabinet confidant to former Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista, whom the Revolution threw out. Their aunt was Castro's first wife, Mirta Diaz Balart, who left Cuba with Fidel's first son, initiating a custody battle that eerily presaged the crisis over the custody and residency of young Elian Gonzalez eight years ago.

Even Hillary Clinton's sister-in-law, Maria Victoria Arias, is a pro-embargo Cuban-American Miami lawyer responsible for the Clintons' campaign contributions and consequently hard-line views on Cuba. Florida Governor Jeb Bush, President George W. Bush's brother, ran the campaign for Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, the first Cuban-American member of Congress.

Embargo Industry

Beyond the blood ties, there is a more subtle and significant architecture that supports the status quo. It's a taxpayer-funded "embargo industry" that employs hundreds, if not thousands, whose livelihoods depend on Cuba remaining, well -- Cuba. It began during the Reagan years with appropriations for Radio and TV Marti that today top $500 million to beam U.S. propaganda into Cuba. In the case of TV Marti, even $225 million can't buy Cuban viewers since the Cuban government jams the signal. But a half a billion bucks does buy jobs, contracts and political loyalties.

Almost simultaneously, hardliners helped create the National Endowment for Democracy. One of the agency's first grants went to the powerful Cuban American National Foundation -- a group that delivered the first Cuban-Americans to Congress. Since 2000, NED has provided at least $4.9 million to Cuba related pro-democracy programs. The windfall from these first programs emboldened the hardliners to write more legislation funding more work for Cuba democracy-builders, that is -- embargo supporters -- in Miami and worldwide. U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) grants to "support political transition in Cuba" totaling more than $40 million have gone primarily to Miami-based groups since they were first doled out in 1996.

Despite a 2000 Price Waterhouse investigation that questioned the effectiveness of the USAID Cuba program, Bush called for a doubling of USAID funding for Cuba in his 2004 Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba plan. (The plan was drawn up by Cuban American Otto Reich, a Bacardi lobbyist and former USAID administrator whose U.S. Cuba Business Council received $600,000 in USAID funds before he entered the White House as Special Envoy to Latin America.) Between 2004 and 2006, approximately $35 million in funds had been transferred to groups working to hasten a "transition" in Cuba.

In the plan, $5 million was earmarked for a public diplomacy effort to "illuminate the reality of Castro's Cuba." The wider community around those affiliated with these government-supported groups make political contributions individually and through political action committees meant to support the hardline, pro-embargo status-quo. Part of the strategy is preventing other Americans from traveling to Cuba to see for themselves what's happening there.

In "illuminating the reality of Castro's Cuba," they have skillfully perpetuated certain misconceptions about Cuba and, in McCarthy-era style, made any positive discussion of the island and its achievements during Castro's tenure taboo. And when momentum to lift the travel ban built in Congress, hardliners got Bush to enact regulatory changes in 2004 that cut 90% of travel to the island, eviscerating the lobbying effort emanating from those businesses and institutions facilitating such travel.

Terrorism

The pro-embargo forces say Cuba is a "terrorist" state. Long before 9/11, all during the 1990s, pro-embargo forces froze a cascade of legislative efforts to modernize our Cuba policy with terrorist allegations absent factual backing. Former U.S. Senator Robert Torricelli (a New Jersey Democrat who left his seat in disgrace) masterfully used this tactic to prevent food and medicine sales, which were banned despite violating all international humanitarian norms under his 1992 Cuban Democracy Act (CDA).

Just as former President Jimmy Carter landed in Havana, the Bush administration loudly accused Cuba of developing bio-weapons in an obvious effort to dilute media coverage of the Carter visit. Carter was blindsided, saying that in months of briefings just prior to the trip, U.S. authorities had not mentioned any such concerns.

If anything, Cuba has been the victim of terrorism to which the U.S. government continues to turn a blind eye. This is undermining our credibility worldwide. In 1976, a Cubana airliner carrying the Cuban Olympic fencing team and others was blown up. Fugitives currently still protected here in the United States, including Luis Posada Carriles, took credit what was then the worst terrorist act of its time. Other acts of violence against Cuba, backed directly or indirectly by the United States, are numerous and well-documented, though one is hard-pressed to find evidence of Cuba using such tactics against our nation.

It has been troubling to watch our own democratic processes cast aside on behalf of the pro-embargo special interests. Former Rep. Tom "The Hammer" DeLay (R-TX), (another reliable embargo supporter later disgraced), violated all legislative norms to cut language easing the embargo, approved by both houses, from final legislation. Lawmakers such as Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) decried this unabashed breech of process, pointing to the irony of seeking "democracy" in Cuba while ignoring the voice of the people here at home.

Economy

Pro-embargo forces say Cuba is an economic mess, but according to the Economist Intelligence Unit and authorities such as the United Nations Economic Commission on Latin America (ECLAC), Cuba has been steadily climbing out of the deep economic depression spurred by the total pullout of their Soviet partners in 1990. China is now the largest foreign investor in Cuba. Companies from countries such as Canada, Spain, and Brazil are buying up exploration rights to Cuba's Gulf Coast waters where industry experts are confident significant oil deposits will be found.

With the help of economic experts such as Vice President Carlos Lage, London School of Economics-trained Central Bank President Francisco Soberon, and other Cubans regularly dealing with professionals worldwide, Cuba has been diversifying its economy, opening up to foreign investment and enjoying some of the highest GDP growth rates in the hemisphere. Problems are still deep, but on the whole experts such as former World Bank chief James Wolfensohn agree that Cuba has fared better than many countries that have gotten assistance from the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and other multilateral assistance over the years. The United States blocks Cuba's participation in these development programs and other international financial institutions even though Cuba is a founding member of the World Trade Organization.

The pro-embargo hardliners say Cuba is one of the world's worst human rights abusers and compare Fidel Castro to Adolph Hitler. It's true that freedoms of the press and assembly, for instance, are hampered in Cuba. Yet Cuba claims U.S. policy constitutes an act of war that prevents more openness. Human Rights Watch and other such groups have called for the embargo's end for this reason. In terms of worldwide perception, however, the worst human rights abuses in Cuba these days are occurring in the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay.

While individual freedoms may suffer in Cuba, the so-called collective human rights to shelter, to healthcare, to education, are enshrined by the Revolution. The Cuban people enjoy a literacy rate
that rivals the United States and a free education through the university level. Cuba has in fact surpassed the United States in some basic health indicators through guaranteed health care for all based on sound principles of prevention and basic public health.

Healthcare

Healthcare is in fact Castro's most treasured legacy. Cuba has gained worldwide goodwill by bringing basic healthcare to poor people around the world. Cuba offered the United States over 1,000 doctors trained in disaster management the first hours following the Katrina disaster. The offer went unrecognized. About a week later that same medical brigade was dispatched to assist Pakistan in the wake of a devastating earthquake. Cuba provided the largest number of doctors of any country there, building an enduring friendship and sympathy about U.S. bullying among the Pakistani people.

The special interest hardliners pushed the Bush Administration to half-heartedly announce incentives to lure these Cuban doctors away from their far-flung posts with promises of free assistance to get to the United States and guaranteed green cards. While so far there has been no discernable response to this effort, it would be natural for a few of the 29,000 Cuban medical personnel abroad to accept. These few would then be paraded around for everyone as evidence of how unhappy the Cuban doctors are.

Havana now has the largest medical school in the world, where students from poor areas who could never pay for a medical education are receiving their degrees and training in Cuba in exchange for their personal commitment to practice in medically underserved areas anywhere in the world. Some 90 U.S. students are taking advantage of these full scholarships in order to return to areas where doctors are sorely needed, such as the impoverished Mississippi Delta region. Hardliners tried to have these students sent home in 2004 when basically all the educational travel to Cuba was cut, but Colin Powell interceded and gave them a special exception to stay, for the time being.

Unlike most Americans, these students have been given the opportunity to live in Cuba, to experience it, warts and all, and arrive at their own conclusions about it. That's a freedom we all have a right to exercise, but for the machinations of those who would rather keep us "illuminated" on their own terms. The Cuban people have a right and deserve an opportunity to participate in the evolution of their country without the corrupting influence of outside interests. It's time to cut the government subsidies that keep the "embargo industry" spinning its tales, to amputate the tail that wags the dog.




-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trthnd4jstc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I believe the Embargo is Excessive, but Cuba is not Democratic!
I cannot accept or support any regime that does not allow the freedom of association, the freedom to dissent, and the freedom to be involved in determining ones own government. I likewise find fault in our government, especially since the inception of the two Patriot Acts, but at least we have a certain level of freedom of association, freedom to dissent, and the freedom to be politically active.

Still the Embargo is draconian. Further, it is allowing other nations to be engaged with Cuba, instead of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And you've been to Cuba to observe this, when?
:eyes:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trthnd4jstc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I have not been to Cuba, I have received 3 letters in the last 4 years from Cuba.
I am against the laws that prevent Cuban Amercicans from sending more than, I think it is $800.00 a year to Cuba. I am against not allowing us to freely travel and trade in Cuba. I am against a bigotted view that we must back this embargo. I also have 5 friends who are Cuban-American. They have mixed feelings about Cuban embargo. I know from your comment you are trying to say, if you have not been to Cuba, you cannot talk. I am not an expert. I am a minor philosopher. I care about justice, and truth. I think that our Policies intent is to break the back of the Cuban government. I do not support that policy. You might. I think you are wrong, and you think I am wrong. That is actually something I would like to see in Cuba. A means for a real opposition.

I do not wish for Cuba to be isolated. I like many things about Cuba. I like their healthcare system. I like that fact that the population seems to be more educated, on the average, compared to us.

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Thanks for the clarification.
:thumbsup:

Welcome to DU's LatAm forum. :hi:

I have been to Cuba many times. I lived there for over a year for one stint. I married a Cuban woman. I have seen a Cuban election season from start to finish. I now live in Miami. I can't visit my in-laws because of Bush's newer policy restricting travel to Cuba.

http://www.poptel.org.uk/cuba-solidarity/democracy.htm
This system in Cuba is based upon universal adult suffrage for all those aged 16 and over. Nobody is excluded from voting, except convicted criminals or those who have left the country. Voter turnouts have usually been in the region of 95% of those eligible .

There are direct elections to municipal, provincial and national assemblies, the latter represent Cuba's parliament.

Electoral candidates are not chosen by small committees of political parties. No political party, including the Communist Party, is permitted to nominate or campaign for any given candidates.

You can read a short version of the Cuban system here,
http://members.allstream.net/~dchris/CubaFAQDemocracy.html

Or a long and detailed version here,

Democracy in Cuba and the 1997-98 Elections
Arnold August
1999
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0968508405/qid=1053879619/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/102-8821757-1670550?v=glance&s=books



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trthnd4jstc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thank you, I am interested in Cuba, thanks for the link.
I am personally a Democratic Socialist. Please note that I put Democratic first. I believe in Socialism through the will of the people. I do know that there is a certain degree of local autonomy, from what 3 of my friends tell me. My concern with my previous comment is with how the central government is run. Of course, my greater concern is with how our central government is run!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magbana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Cuba's Democracy and "Dissidents"
I think if you studied the Cuba electoral system you would be amazed at how democratic it is. With no “propagandizing” allowed, candidates don’t have to sell their soul to the devil to get elected as they do here in the US. Below is a brief summary of the how the system works by a guy who used to be at the Cuban Interests Section.

Regarding the political “dissident” issue, please consider a few things. Cuba is a hotbed of “agents provocateurs” all paid by the US government to do a variety of things: kill Fidel and Raul, sabotage the tourist industry, poison crops and livestock, overthrow the government, lure athletes to the US with a promise of big bucks, etc. This relentless and dangerous interference has been going on since the revolution. In addition, the US harbors nearly every rotten Cuban terrorist including the notorious Luis Posada Carriles and these old guys are not just hanging out on Calle Ocho drinking cafecitos. They are always scheming and you might say that at their advanced age they have nothing left to lose. This is all to say that Cuba must always be on the alert for provocateurs. The 75 “dissidents” who were arrested in 2003 in Cuba were collaborating with the US Interests Section in Havana and receiving large sums of money to overthrow the Cuban government. This is treason in Cuba as well as the United States and often carries a life sentence. These folks did not receive anywhere near a life sentence and some have been released based on health reasons.

I have been to Cuba several times and I couldn’t find a Cuban reluctant to say what he thought about the government.

Cuba’s Electoral System

by Jorge Soberon, Cuban Interests Section in Washington (April 2005)

Municipal level

Every two and a half years between 2 and 8 candidates to be delegates to each Municipal Assembly (Cuba has 169 Municipalities) are elected directly by the electoral constituency with more than 50 percent of the vote. To be part of the electoral constituency or to be elected at this level anyone needs to be 16 years old or more. There is no propaganda only photographs and biographies of the candidates. Voting is secret and voluntary. In the end the elected delegates to the Municipal Assemblies happens to be half of the delegates to the National Assembly of the Peoples Power. The Provincial Electoral Commission determines the size of each electoral constituency within its territory. Any organization at all, not even the Communist Party, proposes any delegates to the Municipal Assembly. Any person, whether is a member of the Communist Party or not, can propose anyone to be a delegate. The size of the electoral constituency at the Municipal level is different according to the number of the population at that level. In the case of Municipalities with more than 50,000 inhabitants there can be different electoral constituencies within the territory. Cuba has more than 11 million inhabitants and about 15 000 electoral constituencies.

Provincial and National Level

Every five years delegates to each Provincial Assembly (Cuba has 14 provinces) and delegates to the National Assembly of the Peoples Power are elected. To be a delegate at those levels or to elect any delegate at those levels you have to be at least 18 years old. The Municipal Assemblies created by the Municipal elections described above, postulates all the candidates to be delegates to the Provincial Assemblies and to be delegates to the National Assembly of the Peoples Power, in a date that is determined by the Council of State. All this candidates are either already elected delegates to the Municipal Assemblies or personalities that live in the specified territory. Again, there is no propaganda only photographs and biographies of the candidates at both levels. Voting is secret and voluntary. Any organization at all, not even the Communist Party, proposes any delegates to these levels. Any person, whether it is a member of the Communist Party or not, can propose anyone to be a delegate. Delegates to both levels proposed by each Municipality Assembly are elected with more than 50 percent of the vote of each Municipality electoral constituency. There are delegates of the National Assembly that are priests, other delegates are not members of the Communist Party.

There are around 1,100 delegates to the Provincial Assemblies and around 600 delegates to the National Assembly of the Peoples Power.

About the National Assembly and the Council of State

45 days after each election of delegates to the National Assembly of the Peoples Power, the Council of State summons the elected delegates and they perform a direct and secret vote for a President, a Vice-president and a Secretary of the National Assembly of the Peoples Power. They also elect 31 members of the Council of State including a President, a First Vice-president, 5 Vice-presidents, a Secretary and other 23 members of the Council of State.

The National Assembly of the Peoples Power is the only organ with constituent and legislative powers.

The Council of State is the permanent representation of the National Assembly of the Peoples Power. So whether there is the National Assembly of the Peoples Power in function as a whole at specific moments of the year or the Council of State functions the rest of the time of the year. The 1976 Constitution establishes that the President of the Council of State is the Head of State and of Government.

Other aspects

A Cuban citizen doesn't have to be a member of the Communist Party to be elected even as a delegate to the National Assembly of the Peoples Power. However, it is the desire and the will of the vast majority of the population to continue the socialist revolutionary ideas and ideals that produce a mass of delegates at every level that follow that desire and will.

The election of Fidel Castro by the delegates of the National Assembly of the Peoples Power has been a recognition of his authority and expertise both in domestic and foreign affairs during all these years. There is nothing that prevents the delegates from choosing the President of the Council of State that they want from among the delegates of the National Assembly of the Peoples Power. Even Fidel is a delegate to the National Assembly of the Peoples Power and has to be elected as such by the procedures explained above, every 5 years.

Usually more than 95% of the constituent’s votes at every level always, this is mainly because of the profound sense of patriotism of Cubans that view each election process as an affirmation of the national sovereignty. High educational levels also contribute to these results. More than 8 million persons vote in every electoral process. Around 45 percent of the candidates are reelected every electoral process.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thanks, magbana. I'm going to read your post later tonight when there's a better chance to focus.
I really appreciate your input on these countries, respect it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magbana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Judi, You are way tooo kind
I am so glad to be on this discussion group because of all the things I am learning. Also because it is such a good group of people Many thanks to everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trthnd4jstc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Beautiful, thanks, there are many great things about Cuban Society.
Thanks a lot for your posting. Also it was very well written and useful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magbana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Welcome to the Discussion Group
Look forward to your participation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. One small point to add (re: electoral process) to magbana's great post.
In Cuba, every six months there is a political recall process in EVERY district for all three levels of parliament (assemblies) called 'accountability sessions'. These are town hall meetings where the elected representatives directly interact with the people to address their issues, needs, wants, desires, complaints, etc. At these sessions a recall of the representative can be initiated by the community. A recall vote is in function almost exactly like a ratification election. If a rep is recalled a new election will be undertaken within a few weeks (or sooner if crisis demands it). That means that nomination sessions are undertaken, then an election, then a ratification election, and if the candidate survives the 'at least 50%+1 of the electorate' ratification election, at that point he/she is the newly elected representative in that district.

I've attended a few of these meetings. They are lively, and a great way for citizens to have their voices heard by their reps. And if their reps don't respond they can be booted out at the next accountability session (every 6 months).

-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magbana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Excellent point about the recall process
Thanks for adding that. If the US pubic knew about this, they would be shocked..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. As you've noticed, as long as the U.S. keeps the doors slammed shut against American travel to Cuba,
the masses can't go there to find out the truth for themselves, and OBVIOUSLY, so many simply have swallowed everything these idiots have told them about Cuba, without ever once becoming mentally alert enough to try to find out more about the situation.

From the article:
In the plan, $5 million was earmarked for a public diplomacy effort to "illuminate the reality of Castro's Cuba." The wider community around those affiliated with these government-supported groups make political contributions individually and through political action committees meant to support the hardline, pro-embargo status-quo. Part of the strategy is preventing other Americans from traveling to Cuba to see for themselves what's happening there.

In "illuminating the reality of Castro's Cuba," they have skillfully perpetuated certain misconceptions about Cuba and, in McCarthy-era style, made any positive discussion of the island and its achievements during Castro's tenure taboo. And when momentum to lift the travel ban built in Congress, hardliners got Bush to enact regulatory changes in 2004 that cut 90% of travel to the island, eviscerating the lobbying effort emanating from those businesses and institutions facilitating such travel.
In the meantime, Canadian and European DU'ers have been coming and going to Cuba for years and years, and think we are actual imbeciles for being so damned ignorant. It was Canadian DU'er Freecancat's impatience with idiot DU'ers who have swallowed the propaganda without questioning it which got her thrown out of D.U. What a damned shame.

It would have been so much better to keep her and throw the fools out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magbana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks for posting the article
I got so busy on the electoral system and "dissidents" that I forgot to tell you what a great article this is. Definitly a "keeper"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC