Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Agreement on Downtown Tunneling for Seattle Regionís East Link Light Rail

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Environment & Energy » Public Transportation and Smart Growth Group Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 08:55 PM
Original message
Agreement on Downtown Tunneling for Seattle Regionís East Link Light Rail

from the Transport Politic blog:





Agreement on Downtown Tunneling for Seattle Regionís East Link Light Rail

Yonah Freemark
October 30th, 2011


At a cost of $2.5 billion, Seattleís planned East Link light rail extension project is one of the nationís largest and most expensive transit expansion programs, which makes it remarkable in itself. A new connection across Lake Washington and into the cities of Bellevue and Redmond will significantly decrease transit times for intercity trips in the region and attract about 50,000 riders a day once it is completed in 2023.

The real achievement of the project, though, is its response to local demands in the form of the construction of a tunnel through Downtown Bellevue, agreed upon by the transit agency Sound Transit last week.

The passage in 2008 by Seattle region voters of the Sound Transit 2 package of bond releases guaranteed that local funding would be available to construct new lines extending the original Seattle light rail line from downtown to Sea-Tac Airport, which opened in 2009. East Link is the largest funded segment, though additional lines running north and south are also planned.

Once it became clear that light rail would be running through Bellevue, the city council made apparent its interest in tunneling the section of the line through the business district. From a point of regional equity, that might have made sense (since Seattle had its own downtown tunnel), but according to initial studies it would cost up to $1 billion more than a surface-level line. With broad streets and thus plenty of potential right-of-way, there would be little reason to spend so much. ..........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2011/10/30/agreement... /



Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Environment & Energy » Public Transportation and Smart Growth Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC