EmeraldCityGrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:40 PM
Original message |
| The White House is now threatening double dip recession. |
|
Larry Summers just released a statement threatening a double dip recession if the Obama Tax Proposal is not passed. This is eerily familiar to Hank Paulson's panicked fear inducing threats used to pass the bank bailouts. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hM9wj...
|
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-08-10 02:41 PM |
#1 |
 -
Exactly! nt |
polichick |
Dec-08-10 02:47 PM |
#10 |
  -
? |
Tuesday Afternoon |
Dec-09-10 11:04 AM |
#108 |
 -
Exactly II. nt |
ladjf |
Dec-08-10 03:08 PM |
#42 |
 -
+1 |
Individualist |
Dec-08-10 03:20 PM |
#59 |
-
Could you PM me what was said, please. Thanks. n/t |
Subdivisions |
Dec-08-10 05:18 PM |
#70 |
-
me too please n/t |
crikkett |
Dec-09-10 09:04 AM |
#98 |
-
Are they telling Reagan was right! The rich will spend all that money they |
county worker |
Dec-08-10 02:43 PM |
#2 |
-
TERROR ALERT! TERROR ALERT! CODE RED!.....I thought Bush's Homeland Security |
Rowdyboy |
Dec-08-10 02:44 PM |
#3 |
-
Yeah, right. As opposed to the permanent depression we get otherwise? |
Lorien |
Dec-08-10 02:44 PM |
#4 |
-
What about Iceland? |
Newest Reality |
Dec-08-10 02:45 PM |
#5 |
 -
Iceland is broke. |
Dogmudgeon |
Dec-08-10 03:06 PM |
#40 |
-
Here is what I was bouncing off of: |
Newest Reality |
Dec-08-10 03:13 PM |
#53 |
-
And they can't become part of the EU, which would undoubtedly help them, |
MoonRiver |
Dec-09-10 09:15 AM |
#102 |
-
If Congress allows all taxes to rise...what would be the economic result? |
TwilightGardener |
Dec-08-10 02:45 PM |
#6 |
 -
The last time tax rates were at those levels |
gratuitous |
Dec-08-10 02:47 PM |
#11 |
  -
Right. But what was the overall economic picture at that time, including |
TwilightGardener |
Dec-08-10 02:50 PM |
#15 |
   -
When Bill Clinton first instituted the tax cuts, we were in a recession. n/t |
Exilednight |
Dec-08-10 09:35 PM |
#87 |
  -
Cause the current situation is exactly like the past you are talkiing about |
Egnever |
Dec-08-10 02:51 PM |
#18 |
 -
Hell, the housing bubble hadn't even taken off yet, back then--the chickens |
TwilightGardener |
Dec-08-10 02:53 PM |
#22 |
  -
the inabilty of some people to diferentiate the difference in the times |
Egnever |
Dec-08-10 02:56 PM |
#28 |
 -
Meh, they're not thinking, they're just reacting. The theme of the day is "Obama |
TwilightGardener |
Dec-08-10 02:58 PM |
#30 |
 -
There is a strange resistance to actual facts here of late |
Egnever |
Dec-08-10 03:03 PM |
#36 |
 -
That is the truth. If I see a post with tons of rec's now, I try to avoid it, because |
TwilightGardener |
Dec-08-10 03:10 PM |
#45 |
 -
I just look at names instead of titles, then decide whether to check it out. Saves a lot of time. |
lamp_shade |
Dec-08-10 03:36 PM |
#64 |
 -
Yeah, I do that too. |
TwilightGardener |
Dec-08-10 03:40 PM |
#66 |
 -
Well, we weren't fighting and occupying two other countries |
gratuitous |
Dec-08-10 02:59 PM |
#32 |
 -
As expected you ignore the tax cuts for 95% of the people |
Egnever |
Dec-08-10 03:01 PM |
#34 |
 -
Not just two, remember Yemen and Pakistan. |
crikkett |
Dec-09-10 09:06 AM |
#99 |
 -
$3.7 trillion over 10 years. |
tekisui |
Dec-08-10 09:38 PM |
#88 |
-
Larry Summers is about as useful as |
Tansy_Gold |
Dec-08-10 02:45 PM |
#7 |
-
OMG, this administration has lost it. |
MadHound |
Dec-08-10 02:45 PM |
#8 |
-
and this is just coming out now?? |
Angry Dragon |
Dec-08-10 02:46 PM |
#9 |
 -
There's urgency now. The tax cuts expire in what--three weeks? |
TwilightGardener |
Dec-08-10 02:47 PM |
#12 |
-
"would significantly raise the risk" doesn't sound like a threat to me. |
lamp_shade |
Dec-08-10 02:49 PM |
#13 |
 -
There is one similarity |
Loge23 |
Dec-08-10 02:52 PM |
#19 |
-
Increasing taxes would be |
ProSense |
Dec-08-10 02:50 PM |
#14 |
 -
no, cutting *spending* now would be contractionary. the government spends |
Hannah Bell |
Dec-08-10 05:33 PM |
#73 |
-
Now they're using fear tactics. Spread the alerts and fear. Fear tne recession. OK, I will |
RKP5637 |
Dec-08-10 02:50 PM |
#16 |
-
Good lord, now they think we're STUPID. |
Hell Hath No Fury |
Dec-08-10 02:51 PM |
#17 |
 -
to be blunt |
Egnever |
Dec-08-10 02:53 PM |
#20 |
-
Did I ever say that is what I want? |
Hell Hath No Fury |
Dec-08-10 03:12 PM |
#52 |
-
Oh dear - this is completely inappropriate. |
DURHAM D |
Dec-08-10 02:53 PM |
#21 |
 -
The WH economic advisor should keep his trap shut about letting |
TwilightGardener |
Dec-08-10 02:55 PM |
#25 |
-
Yes. and Yes. All I could think is "That short little fuck..." |
DURHAM D |
Dec-08-10 02:56 PM |
#29 |
-
"Hank Paulson's panicked fear inducing threats used to pass bank bailouts" |
KansDem |
Dec-08-10 02:54 PM |
#23 |
 -
This video needs to be watched. Yes, very similar. |
Poboy |
Dec-08-10 10:02 PM |
#91 |
-
Double dip? Fuck that, this is more like quadruple dip!!! |
Initech |
Dec-08-10 02:54 PM |
#24 |
 -
There were what, 2.8M foreclosures this past year, something like 3M foreclosures |
RKP5637 |
Dec-08-10 03:11 PM |
#48 |
-
It's the recession that never ends. |
Initech |
Dec-08-10 05:15 PM |
#68 |
-
Interesting that DU is now a stomping ground for so many Chicago School disciples! |
bullwinkle428 |
Dec-08-10 02:55 PM |
#26 |
 -
Surreal as hell! K & R nt |
glitch |
Dec-08-10 07:43 PM |
#80 |
-
Will they accuse the naysayers in congress of "Sex by Surprise" if don't fold? |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Dec-08-10 02:55 PM |
#27 |
-
They're lightweights! They don't know what they're doing. n/t |
RKP5637 |
Dec-08-10 02:59 PM |
#31 |
-
Meet the new boss. |
City Lights |
Dec-08-10 03:01 PM |
#33 |
-
I now must assume that Summers was in the room negotiating with the Republicans. |
DURHAM D |
Dec-08-10 03:02 PM |
#35 |
 -
"Negotiating" for the white house = "I don't need to read it, just tell me where to sign." |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Dec-08-10 03:04 PM |
#37 |
-
Fall In Line and Lick Our Boots, Slaves, or we'll Crash the Economy Again. |
TheWatcher |
Dec-08-10 03:04 PM |
#38 |
-
Whatever we may think, this deal is going to pass. The President does not want to |
thereismore |
Dec-08-10 03:04 PM |
#39 |
 -
'In 2012, we'll have a deficit that's $200,000 bigger.' ...well, at least. |
Bluebear |
Dec-08-10 03:08 PM |
#41 |
-
lol |
DURHAM D |
Dec-08-10 03:11 PM |
#47 |
-
Heh, did I forget millions of dollars? nt |
thereismore |
Dec-08-10 03:17 PM |
#56 |
-
Yesterday, Obama explained that the bill was needed to have |
OHdem10 |
Dec-08-10 03:08 PM |
#43 |
 -
Freudian slip? n/t |
Tansy_Gold |
Dec-08-10 03:11 PM |
#46 |
-
At the press conference |
Nite Owl |
Dec-08-10 03:10 PM |
#44 |
 -
Yes, Obama said no double-dip yesterday; quote: |
BadgerKid |
Dec-08-10 03:22 PM |
#61 |
-
Be afraid, be very afraid. Haven't we heard that before? |
Vinca |
Dec-08-10 03:11 PM |
#49 |
-
Shock Doctrine (nt) |
whatchamacallit |
Dec-08-10 03:11 PM |
#50 |
 -
EXACTLY ! nt |
DURHAM D |
Dec-08-10 03:15 PM |
#55 |
 -
Pure. nt |
thereismore |
Dec-08-10 03:18 PM |
#57 |
 -
That it is. |
harun |
Dec-09-10 02:29 PM |
#111 |
-
This message brought to you by: rich people. |
6000eliot |
Dec-08-10 03:11 PM |
#51 |
-
Give us what we want or ELSE! |
Toucano |
Dec-08-10 03:13 PM |
#54 |
-
Un-F'n-Believable. First his tax cuts, now his playbook? |
LibraLiz1973 |
Dec-08-10 03:18 PM |
#58 |
-
can we say 'FUCK LARRY SUMMERS' on DU? - I don't want to say anything that is illegal |
tomm2thumbs |
Dec-08-10 03:20 PM |
#60 |
 -
FUCK LARRY SUMMERS! And the entire economic team! n/t |
Subdivisions |
Dec-08-10 05:18 PM |
#71 |
  -
I guess that answers my question |
tomm2thumbs |
Dec-08-10 09:29 PM |
#85 |
 -
pretty sure you can and also name an intended orifice |
peekaloo |
Dec-09-10 09:11 AM |
#101 |
-
Tell everyone you know that this is total BS. These clowns disgust me. |
jtown1123 |
Dec-08-10 03:22 PM |
#62 |
-
Is this akin to Biden's assertion that unless the stimulus bill was passed |
Beacool |
Dec-08-10 03:23 PM |
#63 |
-
crying wolf again |
2Design |
Dec-08-10 03:36 PM |
#65 |
-
It's a double dip threat on the recession that everyone knows has not ended...LMAO! |
Safetykitten |
Dec-08-10 03:51 PM |
#67 |
-
A double-dip recession has been expected and will happen regardless |
Subdivisions |
Dec-08-10 05:17 PM |
#69 |
-
Bush Tax Cuts Not Important for US Economy: Summers |
cherokeeprogressive |
Dec-08-10 05:21 PM |
#72 |
 -
Excellent point cherokeeprogressive- |
Poboy |
Dec-08-10 10:09 PM |
#92 |
 -
And then there is Summers' buddy Geithner. |
truedelphi |
Dec-09-10 03:03 PM |
#113 |
-
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner! |
Donnachaidh |
Dec-08-10 06:23 PM |
#74 |
-
Lil Boots must be laughing his ass off! Friggin copycats! |
Little Star |
Dec-08-10 06:50 PM |
#75 |
-
So keeping the same tax cuts we've had all during the recession will now suddenly fix it? |
Kablooie |
Dec-08-10 07:37 PM |
#76 |
 -
It's the very definition of insanity, isn't it. nt |
Lorien |
Dec-08-10 09:38 PM |
#89 |
-
Heard that clip on NPR tonight. I just thought it was the CODE RED thing |
AndrewP |
Dec-08-10 07:39 PM |
#77 |
-
Talk about Shock Doctrine. |
myrna minx |
Dec-08-10 07:41 PM |
#78 |
-
larry summers = Professional Loser |
Amonester |
Dec-08-10 07:42 PM |
#79 |
-
LIARS. CROOKS! STOP THE WARS. n/t |
Catherina |
Dec-08-10 07:43 PM |
#81 |
 -
Absolutely! |
MoonRiver |
Dec-09-10 09:17 AM |
#105 |
-
Extortion. n/t |
ProfessionalLeftist |
Dec-08-10 08:03 PM |
#82 |
 -
where is the 3 page bill they put together? just like 2 years ago? |
Gin |
Dec-08-10 08:08 PM |
#83 |
-
And in closing let Summers always be remembered for the following... |
EmeraldCityGrl |
Dec-08-10 08:28 PM |
#84 |
-
Looks like Barrack learned from George - scare America.... |
SnoopDog |
Dec-08-10 09:32 PM |
#86 |
-
It might happen anyways: even if it the big tax cut bill is passed. |
andym |
Dec-08-10 09:49 PM |
#90 |
-
La plus ca change... n/t |
gkhouston |
Dec-08-10 10:12 PM |
#93 |
-
I saw that! It's like Summers implied - vote for this bill or WE WILL make you pay |
slay |
Dec-08-10 11:40 PM |
#94 |
-
idetnical. |
robinlynne |
Dec-09-10 12:07 AM |
#95 |
-
Orange Alert! Red Alert! Yellow Alert. Duct Tape. |
David Zephyr |
Dec-09-10 12:08 AM |
#96 |
-
then it's obviously another lie, he keeps lying anyway |
StarsInHerHair |
Dec-09-10 12:14 AM |
#97 |
-
threatening is right |
Enrique |
Dec-09-10 09:09 AM |
#100 |
-
I wonder if this will make the repubs drop their support? |
n2doc |
Dec-09-10 09:16 AM |
#103 |
-
What's next? WMD's? n/t |
kentuck |
Dec-09-10 09:17 AM |
#104 |
-
It already is double dip recession for most of us. Welcome to our world Mr. President. nt |
TBF |
Dec-09-10 09:23 AM |
#106 |
 -
+1 |
Tuesday Afternoon |
Dec-09-10 11:05 AM |
#109 |
-
It's like residual Bush admin redux. |
Jamastiene |
Dec-09-10 11:02 AM |
#107 |
 -
The only chance we have of ending the nightmare is to fight back. nt |
TBF |
Dec-09-10 12:11 PM |
#110 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-09-10 02:35 PM |
#112 |
-
Bring it on!! Many of us have little or nothing to lose at this point anyway. |
Swamp Rat |
Dec-09-10 03:09 PM |
#114 |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Tuesday Afternoon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
ladjf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #59 |
| 70. Could you PM me what was said, please. Thanks. n/t |
crikkett
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #70 |
county worker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Are they telling Reagan was right! The rich will spend all that money they |
|
don't have to pay in taxes and help the economy? Trickle down works?
|
Rowdyboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. TERROR ALERT! TERROR ALERT! CODE RED!.....I thought Bush's Homeland Security |
Lorien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Yeah, right. As opposed to the permanent depression we get otherwise? |
Newest Reality
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Is there refusal to pour their people's assets into the bottomless banking coffers of World Owners Inc, and Elite Families Enterprises going to be ignored as they recover from their Shark attack now? You can forget about Poland for the moment. What about Iceland?
|
Dogmudgeon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
They essentially declared national bankruptcy two years ago. Iceland Financial Crisis -- Timeline and ArticlesIf you're more up-to-date on Icelandic news, please let us know. --d!
|
Newest Reality
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
| 53. Here is what I was bouncing off of: |
|
Iceland's decision two years ago to force bondholders to pay for the banking system's collapse appeared to pay off after official figures showed the country exited recession in the third quarter. The Icelandic economy, which contracted for seven consecutive quarters until the summer, grew by 1.2% in the three months to the end of September. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/dec/07/iceland-...
|
MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
| 102. And they can't become part of the EU, which would undoubtedly help them, |
|
because they stubbornly refuse to stop whaling. Iceland can rot in hell. 
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. If Congress allows all taxes to rise...what would be the economic result? |
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 11. The last time tax rates were at those levels |
|
We had federal budget surpluses.
But that's such an esoteric, subtle and hard-to-grasp concept, there's no sense in even voicing it.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 15. Right. But what was the overall economic picture at that time, including |
|
unemployment and the housing market?
|
Exilednight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 87. When Bill Clinton first instituted the tax cuts, we were in a recession. n/t |
Egnever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 18. Cause the current situation is exactly like the past you are talkiing about |
|
Of course actually looking at the diferences in the variables wouldnt fit the narative so I am sure you will chose to ignore them.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 22. Hell, the housing bubble hadn't even taken off yet, back then--the chickens |
|
only started to come home to roost in '07.
|
Egnever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
| 28. the inabilty of some people to diferentiate the difference in the times |
|
Just boggles the brain.
For all the screaming about jobs you see here there doesnt seem to be a shread of thought about the impacts of taking money out of peoples pockets right now.
No the rich dont need their tax cuts but the rest of the country sure as hell does right now.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
| 30. Meh, they're not thinking, they're just reacting. The theme of the day is "Obama |
|
is a bad man and is out to get you", and so every post is going to be immediately read and responded to in that context. It gets the most rec's. Nobody's learning anything or applying facts or reason, just pursuing a story line.
|
Egnever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
| 36. There is a strange resistance to actual facts here of late |
|
It used to be a place to come to learn the truth. It is now a place to come to spread whatever propaganda makes peopel feel empowered.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
| 45. That is the truth. If I see a post with tons of rec's now, I try to avoid it, because |
|
it will be some heartfelt screed of betrayal and disillusionment, but offering little fact or analysis--basically offering little of use to me. Have to really sort through a lot of melodramatic crap and spin, like Fox Newz.
|
lamp_shade
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
| 64. I just look at names instead of titles, then decide whether to check it out. Saves a lot of time. |
|
I've seen some polls with 189 "anti" (Obama) and like 6 "pro". Laughable.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #64 |
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 32. Well, we weren't fighting and occupying two other countries |
|
So, that's kind of different. But we haven't been paying for those little baubles ever, so there's really no sense in starting now, is there? Naturally, the prospect of higher tax rates for corporations and the wealthy wouldn't cause them to consider doing anything to reduce their taxable income, like, as a wild example that would never ever happen, hire more people to reduce their liability and spread the tax burden over more payers? That's just crazy talk.
|
Egnever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
| 34. As expected you ignore the tax cuts for 95% of the people |
|
and the extension of unemployement benefits and focus only on the tax cuts for the rich that are being forced on us by the republicans in oreder to keep the first two.
What was unemployment at back then? compare it to now. Can you see the difference?
|
crikkett
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
| 99. Not just two, remember Yemen and Pakistan. |
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 88. $3.7 trillion over 10 years. |
Tansy_Gold
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Larry Summers is about as useful as |
MadHound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. OMG, this administration has lost it. |
|
I think I'm going to go walk my dogs now. It is warm enough outside, and they make much more sense than this administration.
|
Angry Dragon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. and this is just coming out now?? |
|
Strange that they did not come out with this statement before the election that sounds pretty important to have been kept hidden for so long
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 12. There's urgency now. The tax cuts expire in what--three weeks? |
lamp_shade
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 13. "would significantly raise the risk" doesn't sound like a threat to me. |
Loge23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 19. There is one similarity |
|
Neither are based on any appreciable facts. What a cheap trick.
|
ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 14. Increasing taxes would be |
|
contractionary. Dean BakerIt is important to realize that most of the money in this package is maintaining tax cuts in place that were scheduled to expire. This will prevent tax increases from having a contractionary impact on the economy, however there is very little, if any, net stimulus in this package compared with current levels of taxation and spending.
|
Hannah Bell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 73. no, cutting *spending* now would be contractionary. the government spends |
|
the money or the top 1% offshores it to hedge funds.
|
RKP5637
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 16. Now they're using fear tactics. Spread the alerts and fear. Fear tne recession. OK, I will |
|
I will get slammed for this on DU, but I'll be damned if I'm not getting the same visceral feelings as Bush era.
|
Hell Hath No Fury
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message |
| 17. Good lord, now they think we're STUPID. |
|
Sorry, that play ain't gonna cut.
As if I would believe anything Summers said anyway.
|
Egnever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
If you think raising taxes and discontinuing unemployent right now wont have a detrimental effect on the economy right now well ...You ARE stupid.
|
Hell Hath No Fury
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 52. Did I ever say that is what I want? |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 03:15 PM by Hell Hath No Fury
I am saying them playing the "Oh noes!" card that Bush loved so much is lame. I think all the tax cuts should expire -- I say this as someone who is a member of the working poor and who benefits from the cuts. I think unemployment should be extended - including for the 99ers. And I think the only thing that will bring about serious recovery is a jobs program -- and I'm not talking about more tax cuts for jobs.
On edit:
The proposed bill, as it stands, will not create the jobs or the econonmic momentent needed to fix our continuing crises. It will only further dig us into the Debt Hole without getting a whole hell of a lot in return.
|
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 21. Oh dear - this is completely inappropriate. |
|
Obviously the WH is trying to out flank elected congressional members. People from their own party. I can not recall ever seeing anything like this before this particular President.
Republicans and the Democrat in the White House make a deal. The Democratic leaders are not in the room (just like the so-called HRC reform). Obama quickly calls a press conference to promote the deal. Meanwhile, the Democratic leaders are asked for their response and all they can say for the first several hours is - I haven't seen the details, I don't know what the deal is. Obama deliberately left them flat footed and off balance so they could not have an appropriate response. This is sick. Its two against one. Obama and Republicans against Democrats.
I noticed in his press conference that he used the term "I" when he should of used the term "We" when referring to the workings of congress and legislation. Look for a lot of stories to come out over the next year or two from Hill staffers and elected officials. They have got to be sick of Obama marginalizing them. He is treating them like children. Its an insult.
Its important for the President to use his powers - but in his case he is using the WH inappropriately and has got to be pissing off elected officials. They have covered up this problem until now by not talking about it. They will start to talk - even if it is anonymously.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 25. The WH economic advisor should keep his trap shut about letting |
|
all tax cuts expire? It's inappropriate for him to weigh in?
|
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
| 29. Yes. and Yes. All I could think is "That short little fuck..." |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 02:58 PM by DURHAM D
But it is obviously the WH strategy to outmaneuver their own party leadership.
|
KansDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message |
| 23. "Hank Paulson's panicked fear inducing threats used to pass bank bailouts" |
|
Wasn't that the "martial law will have to be declared if the bailout wasn't passed" horseshit? Oh, yeah...here it is! YouTube
|
Poboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
| 91. This video needs to be watched. Yes, very similar. |
Initech
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message |
| 24. Double dip? Fuck that, this is more like quadruple dip!!! |
RKP5637
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
| 48. There were what, 2.8M foreclosures this past year, something like 3M foreclosures |
|
projected in 2011. An effective rate of 17% unemployment. 56M still without health coverage ... etc. Many are living in a Great Depression, but they are getting swept under the rug IMO. And all we hear about is the middle class. What happened to the lower class, did we ship them out of the country. I think there are so many people hurting in this country and MSM propagandized agenda is to focus on the lame and dumbed down tabloid journalism.
Exactly, "this is more like quadruple dip!!!"
|
Initech
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
| 68. It's the recession that never ends. |
|
That is unless we rise up and take these fucking bastards for everything they've got.
|
bullwinkle428
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:55 PM
Response to Original message |
| 26. Interesting that DU is now a stomping ground for so many Chicago School disciples! |
glitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
| 80. Surreal as hell! K & R nt |
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:55 PM
Response to Original message |
| 27. Will they accuse the naysayers in congress of "Sex by Surprise" if don't fold? |
RKP5637
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 02:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 31. They're lightweights! They don't know what they're doing. n/t |
City Lights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:01 PM
Response to Original message |
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 35. I now must assume that Summers was in the room negotiating with the Republicans. |
|
Summers would never lower himself to meet with the Democratic leadership.
Clinton marginalized that SOB - Obama sits on his lap.
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
| 37. "Negotiating" for the white house = "I don't need to read it, just tell me where to sign." |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 03:23 PM by Tierra_y_Libertad
|
TheWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 38. Fall In Line and Lick Our Boots, Slaves, or we'll Crash the Economy Again. |
|
And this time, It will be PERSONAL. Go Fuck Yourself Larry. You're among the many Criminals I'd like to see Dexter cover in Plastic. 
|
thereismore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 39. Whatever we may think, this deal is going to pass. The President does not want to |
|
raise taxes. Everybody is hoping for a better next two years. In 2012, we'll have a deficit that's $200,000 bigger. They are trading that certainty for maybe a chance of improved economy. In 2 years, we'll have another fight.
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
| 41. 'In 2012, we'll have a deficit that's $200,000 bigger.' ...well, at least. |
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
thereismore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
| 56. Heh, did I forget millions of dollars? nt |
OHdem10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:08 PM
Response to Original message |
| 43. Yesterday, Obama explained that the bill was needed to have |
|
the country falling backwards. He repeated it at least 3 times.
|
Tansy_Gold
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
Nite Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:10 PM
Response to Original message |
| 44. At the press conference |
|
didn't Obama say we weren't in danger of a double dip recession?
|
BadgerKid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
| 61. Yes, Obama said no double-dip yesterday; quote: |
|
THE PRESIDENT: This is not as significant a boost to the economy as the Recovery Act was, but we’re in a different situation now. I mean, when the Recovery Act passed, we were looking at a potential Great Depression and we might have seen unemployment go up to 15 percent, 20 percent -- we don’t know. In combination with the work we did in stabilizing the financial system, the work that the Federal Reserve did, that’s behind us now. We don’t have the danger of a double-dip recession.
|
Vinca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 49. Be afraid, be very afraid. Haven't we heard that before? |
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #50 |
thereismore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #50 |
harun
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #50 |
6000eliot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 51. This message brought to you by: rich people. |
Toucano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |
| 54. Give us what we want or ELSE! |
|
New boss, same as the old boss.
|
LibraLiz1973
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message |
| 58. Un-F'n-Believable. First his tax cuts, now his playbook? |
tomm2thumbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message |
| 60. can we say 'FUCK LARRY SUMMERS' on DU? - I don't want to say anything that is illegal |
|
but believe me, I'm damn well thinking it
|
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #60 |
| 71. FUCK LARRY SUMMERS! And the entire economic team! n/t |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 05:19 PM by Subdivisions
|
tomm2thumbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #71 |
| 85. I guess that answers my question |
|
thanks... you said it for all of us!
|
peekaloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #60 |
| 101. pretty sure you can and also name an intended orifice |
|
say ,in his ear, for example. 
|
jtown1123
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:22 PM
Response to Original message |
| 62. Tell everyone you know that this is total BS. These clowns disgust me. |
Beacool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 63. Is this akin to Biden's assertion that unless the stimulus bill was passed |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 03:24 PM by Beacool
unemployment would rise to 8%? Well, it's currently at 9.8% and counting. I wonder if these people live in the real world.....
|
2Design
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message |
Safetykitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message |
| 67. It's a double dip threat on the recession that everyone knows has not ended...LMAO! |
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| 69. A double-dip recession has been expected and will happen regardless |
|
of what Larry Summers sorry ass says.
|
cherokeeprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 72. Bush Tax Cuts Not Important for US Economy: Summers |
|
They were not important until they were important? Fuck me the amateuristic nature of this administration is more entertaining by the day. Someday soon, this administration will simply devolve into the Keystone Kops. Cue the defenders saying "Summers said that almost 100 days ago... things change!" http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
|
Poboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #72 |
| 92. Excellent point cherokeeprogressive- |
|
Bush Tax Cuts Not Important for US Economy: Summers
Maintaining tax cuts for top wage-earners should take a back seat to other more pressing measures, White House economic advisor Larry Summers said, in a signal the administration could be digging in its heels on the issue.
In an interview with CNBC, Summers stopped short of saying the Obama administration would oppose continuing the across-the-board cuts approved by former President George W. Bush. But he dismissed the importance of continuing the cuts for those earning over $250,000, a key part of the political battle raging in Washington. The cuts expire at the end of 2010.
"With deficits looming as seriously as they are, why is now the right moment to lock in several hundred billion dollars of tax cuts for 2 percent of the population when we could be using those revenues to strengthen incentives for investment in the country's future?" Summers said.
"I think the case is pretty clear, if you look at what the vast majority of economists are saying, (that) what will stimulate economy more are measures that are targeted at investments, it's measures that are targeted at research and development," he continued. "So I think those are the right steps forward."
|
truedelphi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #72 |
| 113. And then there is Summers' buddy Geithner. |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 03:04 PM by truedelphi
The Australian press had a field day, when they first found out that Obama had appointed Tim G. to head the U.S. Treasury.
Tim had been selected by the IMF as their point man to deal with the Far East crisis of the mid nineties. Tim's job was to "help" Japan pick a model by which that nation could recover.
Well, he had all of two choices - and he chose the model that has left the Japanese still struggling with their economy.
But who is to say that his friends at various Financial Institutions didn't benefit!
|
Donnachaidh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 74. Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner! |
|
Been thinking that all along -- the *URGENCY* was akin to scenery chewing -- Bad Actors pulling off another HEIST.
|
Little Star
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 75. Lil Boots must be laughing his ass off! Friggin copycats! |
|
F*#k this administration for their fear tactics.
|
Kablooie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message |
| 76. So keeping the same tax cuts we've had all during the recession will now suddenly fix it? |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-08-10 07:38 PM by Kablooie
|
Lorien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #76 |
| 89. It's the very definition of insanity, isn't it. nt |
AndrewP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |
| 77. Heard that clip on NPR tonight. I just thought it was the CODE RED thing |
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
| 78. Talk about Shock Doctrine. |
|
 How anyone trusts these guys anymore is amazing to me.
|
Amonester
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message |
| 79. larry summers = Professional Loser |
|
and so is tim geithner
many others in there too
|
Catherina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message |
| 81. LIARS. CROOKS! STOP THE WARS. n/t |
MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #81 |
|
All our financial woes would end overnight if we just got out of these brutal and unwinnable wars!
|
ProfessionalLeftist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message |
Gin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #82 |
| 83. where is the 3 page bill they put together? just like 2 years ago? |
EmeraldCityGrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 08:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 84. And in closing let Summers always be remembered for the following... |
|
November 5, 1999: Congress Passes Landmark Bill Repealing the Glass-Stea gall Act; Dissenting Lawmakers Voice Warnings over Easing of Bank Rules Congress approves legislatio n which repeals the Glass-Stea gall Act of 1933, greatly reducing regulation of Wall Street and clearing the way for the cross-owne rship of banks, securities firms and insurers. The measure is approved in the Senate by a vote of 90 to 8 and in the House by 362 to 57. President Bill Clinton will sign the Gramm-Leac h-Bliley Act into law on November 12th, 1999. The New York Times reports that passage of the bill elicits optimism that the measure will enhance American competitiv eness and ensure American dominance in the global financial marketplac e, as well as concerns that deregulati on will lead to a future financial meltdown. The Times further notes that experts predict the new law will result in a wave of large financial mergers. Optimism over Passage of the Measure - Treasury Secretary Lawrence H. Summers praises the legislatio n, declaring that the law “will better enable American companies to compete in the new economy.” Among others praising passage of the measure:
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=Congress...
|
SnoopDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |
| 86. Looks like Barrack learned from George - scare America.... |
|
Fear works so well with Americans for some reason...
|
andym
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 90. It might happen anyways: even if it the big tax cut bill is passed. |
|
Economy is still fragile. Tax bill is only a weak stimulus.
|
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 10:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 93. La plus ca change... n/t |
slay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-08-10 11:40 PM
Response to Original message |
| 94. I saw that! It's like Summers implied - vote for this bill or WE WILL make you pay |
|
these are some seriously nasty folks Obama has on his team. 
|
robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 12:07 AM
Response to Original message |
David Zephyr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 12:08 AM
Response to Original message |
| 96. Orange Alert! Red Alert! Yellow Alert. Duct Tape. |
|
Same shit, different day.
EmeraldCityGrl, your comments are spot on! K&R.
|
StarsInHerHair
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 12:14 AM
Response to Original message |
| 97. then it's obviously another lie, he keeps lying anyway |
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 09:09 AM
Response to Original message |
| 100. threatening is right |
|
carrots for the GOP and the rich and the banks, sticks for us. 
|
n2doc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 09:16 AM
Response to Original message |
| 103. I wonder if this will make the repubs drop their support? |
|
After all, if we have a double recession, and the economy still sucks in '12, Obama is toast no matter who runs against him. Seems like the Repubs would jump at a chance to set that up.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 09:17 AM
Response to Original message |
| 104. What's next? WMD's? n/t |
TBF
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 09:23 AM
Response to Original message |
| 106. It already is double dip recession for most of us. Welcome to our world Mr. President. nt |
Tuesday Afternoon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #106 |
Jamastiene
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 11:02 AM
Response to Original message |
| 107. It's like residual Bush admin redux. |
|
Be vewwy vewwy scared. we know what's best for you and it's the same old same old. Give me a fucking break. Will the nightmare ever end? 
|
TBF
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #107 |
| 110. The only chance we have of ending the nightmare is to fight back. nt |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Swamp Rat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 114. Bring it on!! Many of us have little or nothing to lose at this point anyway. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 23rd 2013, 09:05 AM
Response to Original message |