Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Jersey puts environmental documents off-limits to public: Enforcement, Inspection, Ownership

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:30 PM
Original message
New Jersey puts environmental documents off-limits to public: Enforcement, Inspection, Ownership
Trenton — In a little-noticed move, New Jersey has signaled that it will eliminate public access to a broad range of currently public documents, including records regarding enforcement negotiations with polluters and pollution permits, according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).

Broad information categories that would leave the public domain also include records about reservoirs, refineries, sewage treatment plants, or any other facility deemed “critical infrastructure.”

The proposal posted this week by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) would block release for several new categories of records requested from under the state Open Public Records Act (OPRA), including –

•Records “relating to mediation proceedings conducted by or on behalf of the Department.” This could not only make confidential a broad range of enforcement-related negotiations with polluters but also shield the operations of DEP’s new Office of Dispute Resolution from public scrutiny;

•Information with homeland security implications. The sweeping wording (“If access to the record would interfere with the State’s security, then the record will not be produced”) could bar access to all DEP records on water, sewer, chemical plants or any other infrastructure; and

•Records relating to land, acquisitions, property transfers or title searches where disclosure might jeopardize transactions. This exemption would likely prevent pre-review of the sweetheart easement DEP negotiated this summer for a $ 2 billion natural gas pipeline crossing parklands.

“Virtually every aspect of New Jersey’s environmental programs would benefit from more openness, not less,” stated New Jersey PEER Director Bill Wolfe, a former DEP analyst, noting that closed-door mediation policies recently prevented the public from attending the whistleblower hearing of the DEP’s senior nuclear engineer, Dennis Zannoni, who had raised safety concerns about the re-licensure of the Oyster Creek reactor. “DEP has not made a cogent argument for why we need additional state secrets.”

Deal-making within DEP also figured into the blockbuster corruption indictments of state legislators and other officials in the summer of 2009. Partially in reaction to those scandals, Governor Chris Christie pledged to make transparency and accountability hallmarks of his administration.

Within DEP, newly appointed Commissioner Bob Martin said in an interview this past March: “One of the key things … for us is just transparency…. It’s my goal … to get everything out in the press … be very open about what we’re doing all the time and there’s no secrets.”

“These new proposed public record exemptions do not square with Christie administration promises of transparency,” Wolfe added, pointing to his legal battles to extract records from DEP under the current OPRA standards. “Even if it is administratively inconvenient to the Department, the public has a right to know what is being done and said in its name.”

http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=1429


Christie is a fucking gangster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gangster or politician.
Doesn't seem to be much difference these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. I cannot stand...
Chris Christie....I think he is a fraud....he is all for being fiscally conservative when it comes to the statebudget no matter how much programs are needed by the people but when he was in DOJ he spent our money like it grew on tress...spending wildly is okay to Christie when it is for his own benefit....SORRY...I KNOW THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE POST BUT JUST NEEDED TO GET THIS OFF MY CHEST :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. that's ok, i hate the corrupt grafty fraud too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Of the people, by the people, for the...
:rofl: Sorry, I just couldn't finish it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC