Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alaska native status gave tiny, inexperienced firm a $250 million Army contract

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 06:38 AM
Original message
Alaska native status gave tiny, inexperienced firm a $250 million Army contract



Alaska native status gave tiny, inexperienced firm a $250 million Army contract
By Robert O'Harrow Jr.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, November 26, 2010; 12:01 AM

In summer 2008, the U.S. military had a major problem. More than 2,400 service members had reported being sexually assaulted the previous year, and the number was rising. Congress wanted immediate action.

The Army responded by reaching out to a tiny firm in Delaware.

It was an unlikely choice for such a sensitive task. The year before, United Solutions and Services, known as US2, had just three employees and several small contracts for janitorial services and other work. It was based in a four-bedroom colonial, where the founder worked out of his living room.

But the firm had one quality the Army prized: It was co-owned by an Alaska native corporation (ANC) and therefore could receive federal contracts of any size without competition, under special set-aside exemptions granted by Congress to help impoverished Alaska natives.

On Sept. 2, 2008, US2 was granted a deal worth as much as $250 million - 3,000 times the $73,000 in revenue the firm claimed the year before. The contract enabled the Army to quickly fund a wide array of projects, including a global campaign to prevent sexual assault and harassment, without seeking outside bids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Criminals at work
Lots of this SHIT goes on with little or no oversight

AS in "HOW THE FUCK DID BLACKWATER GET STARTED"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yep. State sanctioned mafia.
And I agree that it is common place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frederickbat Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Alaska native
It was an unlikely choice for such a sensitive task. The year before, United Solutions and Services, known as US2, had just three employees and several small contracts for janitorial services and other work. It was based in a four-bedroom colonial, where the founder worked out of his living room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Welcome to DU, frederickbat!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Native American corporations IN NAME ONLY are a pretty common occurance
These corporations have been scoring government contracts for years.

I even thought about working for one back in the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. as are all sorts of other "minority-owned" corps
Being right outside DC, I can't tell you how many companies I have seen set up for the specific purpose of exploiting the contracting rules, but I can tell you it's routine, common, and well-known enough to be a running joke I could share with virtually any stranger I passed by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. no bid contracts = tax dollars at 'work'. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC