Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EPA Toxic Substance Database is 55 Years Behind Schedule

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 08:03 AM
Original message
EPA Toxic Substance Database is 55 Years Behind Schedule
EPA Toxic Substance Database is 55 Years Behind Schedule

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is supposed to maintain a database of dangerous chemicals to better inform the public of risks posed by the substances. But EPA officials have fallen so far behind on updating the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) that it would take 55 years at their current pace to get things in order. The agency had promised 18 months ago to implement reforms for IRIS, which was first created in 1985. But not enough progress has been made to properly profile more than 250 chemicals and determine their potential links to cancer, birth defects and other health problems.

According to a report by the Center for Progressive Reform, “77 of the hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) listed in IRIS are missing the most important piece of information–an assessment of how much of the substance may be safely inhaled.” In 2008, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) warned that the Bush administration’s go-slow approach to EPA regulation was completing only two profiles a year, and putting the IRIS database at risk of becoming obsolete.

http://www.allgov.com/Controversies/ViewNews/EPA_Toxic_Substance_Database_is_55_Years_Behind_Schedule_101111
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Meh, that's just big government nanny state crap.
They shouldn't be telling us which chemicals are "deadly."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, difference between telling us which are and which we cannot use by choice
But then, some people like having their choices limited by rich white folks in congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC