Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do the new TSA scanners worry you?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 06:43 PM
Original message
Poll question: Do the new TSA scanners worry you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Everything about TSA worries me.
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 06:49 PM by TexasObserver
More use of the "terror" bloody shirt to impose restrictions that make America less free.

Air travel in this country used to be fun. Now it's running a gauntlet of TSA agents who ought to be cooking fries at McDonalds or working loss prevention at Walmart.

I don't care if they see my junk. That part is irrelevant to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. What makes you think they all should be cooking fries at McDonald's?
I don't fly often, but I've been pulled aside for further checking more than once. The folks I've dealt with are professional and courteous. I've gone through airport inspections in Brazil, Ireland, England, Switzerland, France and Germany. I don't see a real difference among the inspectors, aside from the officers at Ireland West Airport Knock who didn't know what my C-pap machine was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. when submitting to the abuse.... then of course you get professional and courteous
dare to refuse the naked scan or feel up, and reason is no longer part of the equation.

people that have no issue with rights being taken away, or treated like a criminal jump thru the hoops and say.... what abuse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
40. The little snot-nosed idiot I had to deal with last summer
at the airport wasn't qualified to cook fries at McDonald's. They have some standards. Her ONLY job option was TSA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. That's pretty much the norm.
Mall cops are more qualified to fill that role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. I love train travel more and more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not modest at all so I don't care one way or the other...
But I can understand why so many have concerns about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how the officers are supposed to know that someone is
carrying a concealed weapon just by looking at him or her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. concealed weapon? how about in plain view. belt? tie? hands? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. The TSA must be shut down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. And your plan for ensuring the safety of the air travel system is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. do you drive? do you get out of bed in the morning? you have more risk doing those two things
than getting on a plane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Do you remember the 60's?
There were about 2 airline hijackings a month before upgraded security was introduced. Do you think people really want to go back to that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. are you suggesting it is all or nothing? where is you line of invasion? cavity searches?
picking out young females to get jollies on scans? harrassing women to tears that have been raped or molested? treating all of us as criminals and total power over us without rights? are you really that afraid? last 9 yrs the only ones caught were not by tsa, but passengers. the scanners would not have picked it up.

how far are you willing to go to feel... feel.... safe. understanding it is only an illusion of safety
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. So, what is your solution?
I'm not defending TSA, but people that bitch about them never define what security is acceptable. Any type of security is some invasion of privacy. So what are you proposing? Pre 9/11 security? Less than that? More than that? All the way up to Israeli airline security with everything hand searched and interviews?

What YOUR solution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. you didnt answer my questions. cavity searches ok? cause i gotta tell ya, these naked scans are
Edited on Thu Nov-11-10 09:58 AM by seabeyond
not enough to keep you safe.

molesting a rape victim?

humiliation and degradation to instill fear and compliance? that is what our military uses to torture.... you understand, torture detainees to get them to talk

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. Since you won't answer, here is my airline security solution.

Drop the shoe scanning.
Drop the liquid bans.
Drop the body scanners.
Keep the metal detectors.
Keep the carry on x-ray machines.
Keep the ban on box cutters, knives, etc.
You fail the metal detector, you get a hand scanner.
You fail the hand scanner, you get a pat down. (just like the pre TSA days)

All of these are still some invasion of privacy, but it's not opening up the wild west on-board either.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. i can do all that. i dont understand if a person objects to the invasions, assumed all or nothing.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. In this case because the subthread started with "TSA needs to be shutdown"
That's a little overboard the other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. ah, i took it as tsa has run amuck. shut down and create a reasonable security.
but really, i didnt even pay attention to the title
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. behavior. i think another part ignored is we are all criminals and warrant such treatment
that tsa is godlike all powerful. that is another issue needs to be addressed.

i think in training with any position of power over the people there must be a strong line dealing with abuse. i think that the supervisors have ultimate responsibility in not allowing abuse, or abusive attitudes. that is complete opposite of the mentality today.

twice i had a situation where a person simple didnt like my attitude. there was not a single thing i did to suggest i was a big bad terrorist and gonna take plane down, but an intent to solely abuse power because they wanted to teach me something.

i was pulled out. i am always pulled out. i was dealing with 4 and 6 yr old. round trip week vacation to florida. small city airport, employees from this small city. had license, new where i lived. 40 yr old mom, two little kids, no threat to blow up. i was pulled out and woman says, .... how are you. i say, this is crap, as i am being wanded. not a big deal. wasnt hostile. wasnt even thinking about what i said. 6 in morning, not enough coffee, and going thru mind about if i got everything done.

i was flagged. i had grown men work on intimidating me.

again, didnt think of intimidated. didnt think i was suppoe to be afraid. didnt think to lower eyes and submit. wasnt a thought. sorry. they then put fear of god into my two young kids, putting behind a table and going thru their back packs that had been scanned, looking for a weapon.

another time i missed my plane. why? because i was pulled out. told to sit, lift leg to get scanned. i did. the woman walked away to talk to another person. i waited. she didnt come back. i dared to lower leg while i waited for her. she was pissed my leg still wasnt up, so she could scan. took enough time, i missed plane.

it goes beyong those simple procedures you say.

i dont have to be nice. i dont have to lower eyes. i dont have to be submissive in attitude. i can even not like what i am doing. if i do nothing wrong, i still have done nothing wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. I agree about the training.
Where there is power there is a strong temptation for abuse.

Most of the TSA agents I deal with on a weekly basis are great. In fact, I feel for them sometimes watching how some folks react and treat them.

Then there are the agents who get an ego boost from the badge... Looks like you've had the bad luck of dealing with those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
43. The TSA doesn't have a plan for ensuring the safety of air travel.
It's a collection of Rube Goldberg checks of freight and dog-and-pony show security for passengers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sally cat Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Groping and radiation? Hasn't this gone way too far? People are getting pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. Where is the "no" option - I'd rather an xray than some TSA agent
molesting me at the airport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. Yes, and no
Yes, because it is a potential health hazard and an outrageous invasion of privacy. No, because of past outrageous invasions of privacy, I no longer fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. it would be nice not to have a job that requires air travel
I can't stand the invasion of privacy, but it's what I have to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. Since its too expensive to fly these days..
I am certainly not worried, since I don't plan to fly anywhere in the future. Can't afford it. I think my traveling to exotic places days are over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. the more people that refuse these invasions will not be putting $ in, the ticket price will increase
Edited on Thu Nov-11-10 09:27 AM by seabeyond
so all the people that say (not you), dont like it, dont fly is hurting themselves. the more people that refuse to fly is going to cause ailines to increase price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. That doesn't make sense.
Edited on Thu Nov-11-10 09:31 AM by AsahinaKimi
So you are saying, that for example, a restaurant that people boycott will raise their prices to compensate? no, no, no. I don't see that happening. It would kill their business. You want to bring people back to your restaurant? You lower prices..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. if your food tastes like shit, and lower prices, dont get the customers, you go out of business
Edited on Thu Nov-11-10 09:36 AM by seabeyond
airlines can lower prices all they want. people refuse to fly because of invasions and abuse, people will continue to not fly. they MUST raise the prices to cover cost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. If your food tastes like...
Can we say MCDONALDS? How many rich people do you see going there? Why do people go there? Cause its cheap. Poor people don't have a lot of choices, so even if the food is bad, (and most people know it is) they will buy it anyway. Why? cause its cheap and available.

And by the way, their are cheaper Airlines. Infact most airlines are competing with each other, that drives the prices down, not up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. i like mcky d'ees. it is a treat in our house cause i dont allow often, unhealthy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I see you are not getting my point...
never mind than, lets agree to disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. i get your point. i dont agree. and i absolutely agree
to disagree, lol

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. I don't fly either
unless a company or organization is paying for it. The TSA is a problem for people with more money than me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
27. still another reason not to fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. The #1 reason for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
29. I go through airport security about 2-4 times per week for my job.
Do the scanners worry me from a health perspective? No. Two minutes of flight time is more radiation than those put out.

Do the scanners worry me from a modesty standpoint? Not really.

What does bother me is that the scanners are incredibly slow and security lines progress about 1/4 the speed as metal detectors. Long waits.

Also, I don't really believe they are much more effective than metal detectors. It's just a cool new tool that really isn't going to make any difference in security.

So, the scanners will slow things down, embarrass some people, and not add any appreciable security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
30. I think TSA employees should be more worried about seeing me naked
I am not a pretty sight any more. They have to go home with naked images of guys like me burned into their retinas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
34. The backscatter machines emit IONIZING X-RAY - hello skin cancer nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
38. Who knew that TSA would come to stand for
Edited on Thu Nov-11-10 10:56 AM by LibDemAlways
TitS 'n Ass?

The only way to put pressure on the goons is for people to quit flying and tell the airlines why. If the airlines were deluged with Amtrak receipts, gasoline receipts, etc. along with letters explaining "Hey, I drove/took a train to (insert destination here) for my vacation because I refuse to be abused by TSA," and the airlines saw it seriously affecting the bottom line, things would change in a hurry. Politicians are much more likely to address the concerns of big business than the flying public.

There's a group on this website

http://www.reddit.com/r/OperationGrabAss

that is working to put together and fund anti-TSA ads to create public awareness.

One of the best ideas proposed by a poster over there is an image of the Statue of Liberty, torch and crown in the plastic bins, crying while undergoing an invasive pat-down search.

Perhaps it's a good thing that TSA has finally crossed this line. The more people who fight back, the sooner we will go back to some semblance of sanity at the airport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
41. I don't fly. I believe in "Slow Travel". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC