Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Doesn’t Need Congress to Create Millions of Jobs: Jeanne Mirer and Marjorie Cohn

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 08:22 AM
Original message
Obama Doesn’t Need Congress to Create Millions of Jobs: Jeanne Mirer and Marjorie Cohn
Obama Doesn’t Need Congress to Create Millions of Jobs: Jeanne Mirer and Marjorie Cohn

Forget Congress, argue attorneys Jeanne Mirer and Marjorie Cohn. President Barack Obama has all the authority and resources needed at his disposal to create millions of new jobs for unemployed Americans.

Just as others on the left have remarked during the past two years, Mirer and Cohn believe Obama needs to take a page out of the past and do what Franklin Roosevelt did during the Depression to help get the country back on its feet. In this case, the historical example is Executive Order 7034, which Roosevelt signed to appropriate $4.8 billion for the Works Progress Administration and put people back to work.

What Obama should do is use his presidential powers to redirect monies paid back to the government by companies that were rescued under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) in order to finance new employment opportunities.

“Much of the TARP money has been repaid and the administration refers to the profit on the payments,” write Mirer and Cohn. “If one assumes an average cost of one job is $50,000, 6 million jobs could be immediately created for $300 billion. 12 million jobs could be created for $600 billion. Because this is already appropriated money, Congressional Republicans could not block it.”

http://www.allgov.com/Opinion_from_the_Left/ViewNews/Obama_Doesnt_Need_Congress_to_Create_Millions_of_Jobs__Jeanne_Mirer_and_Marjorie_Cohn_101110
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. So of course, he'll get right on that, because the jobless need jobs.
Right?




Right?



Any minute now....



He's on it.......



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. He has a job...well for at least the next two yrs. That's all he's concerned about.
Well that and how many jobs India will create. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'd like to see that.
But the previous two years has shown that Obama is too timid to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Where the hell is that money? That is something has me
confused, we hear the TARP is been paid back but why hasn't the deficit gone down? Where did that money go? If we got $600 billion back from TARP why hasn't the deficit gone down an equal amount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just don't let him become a "fierce advocate" whatever you do. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Do we really want to set a percentage where the President takes funds from one program
And spends it wherever he likes?

Isn't that ripe for abuse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. But if he does that, the Republicans might say bad things about him! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well we need to keep our powder dry, there is another election in 2 years
Someday, there will be 20 years between elections and then we might be able to act and hope people will forget what we did by the next election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. One can never have enough dry powder! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. I thought executive orders were for war and Constitutional violations
....oh wait.

Such a move would guarantee voter support in 2012. Hence his smaller government advisors are probably against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. It is doable, but there is no desire.
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 08:42 AM by blindpig
The priorities are otherwise. it would be anathema to the Chamber of Commerce and the NAM and it is too apparent who has the president's ear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. Not Everyone Can Build Roads...
For young people a new CCC or other "shovel-ready" job may work but not for the many over 40 who have taken the brunt of the economic downturn. Rebuilding infrastructure is very important and should be a priority, but that doesn't cover the millions of white collar/cube rat/service-oriented jobs that grew during the 90s. The government can't create those jobs.

The private sector has always been the engine of prosperity in combination with government regulation. The outsourcing of jobs has hit critical mass and is a major reason while some sectors will recover most are still depressed...people can't spend money when they don't have jobs or are fearful of losing theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC