Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hit and run fund manager not charged for felony "because it could hurt his job"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 03:34 PM
Original message
Hit and run fund manager not charged for felony "because it could hurt his job"
Alleged hit-and-run driver may not face felony
Victim, attorneys furious with misdemeanor deal
Randy Wyrick
[email protected]
Vail, CO Colorado



EAGLE, Colorado — A financial manager for wealthy clients will not face felony charges for a hit-and-run because it could jeopardize his job, prosecutors said Thursday.

Martin Joel Erzinger, 52, faces two misdemeanor traffic charges stemming from a July 3 incident when he allegedly hit bicyclist Dr. Steven Milo from behind then sped away, according to court documents.

Snip....
The victim, a doctor, ......"suffered spinal cord injuries, bleeding from his brain and damage to his knee and scapula, according to court documents. Over the past six weeks he has suffered “disabling” spinal headaches and faces multiple surgeries for a herniated disc and plastic surgery to fix the scars he suffered in the accident.

“He will have lifetime pain,” Haddon wrote. “His ability to deal with the physical challenges of his profession — liver transplant surgery — has been seriously jeopardized.”

http://www.vaildaily.com/article/20101104/NEWS/101109939/1078&ParentProfile=1062


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope he sued for every penny of his bonus-and then some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. While I agree with you, it is part of a disturbing trend to not prosecute
illegal acts committed by the "elite" class.
Ironically, a doctor was the victim of such an "elite".

Suing is one thing.
Applying the law is another, and that seems to not be happening across a wide spectrum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. +5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. What's to stop someone from intentionally killing someone if they thought they
could get away with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Nothing. And they have.
Directly, like the contractors and CIA in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan.
directly, like the police who kill citizens and get a hand slap.

Indirectly, like the banksters, who create more and more homeless people to starve and freeze.

A person would have to be blind not to notice there is a definite 2 tier rule of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is FASCISM!
And of course, the law enforcement agencies are protecting the privileged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. Ding ding
We have a winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wall street can't kill enough of us with their fraud
now they have to hunt people down on the streets and try to kill them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Misde fuckin meanor?
Hit and run? a guy on a bicycle?

Hit him from behind?

There has to be more to this. Maybe the cycling doctor raped the guys daughter or somethin.

That sumbitch ought to be in jail for 50 years not walking away with a slap on the wrist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Remove the prosecutors!
Yeah, our country is lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Growing some pot in your closet will get you a felony,
but running over somebody and fleeing is just a minor deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. As long as you're rich & important to other rich people, nothing is illegal. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 06:04 PM
Original message
+1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yeshuah Ben Joseph Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. So let me see if I get this right...
A doctor, who actually contributed something valuable to this planet will no longer be able to do his job.

The scumbag who was responsible - who was a criminal even BEFORE he drove drunk (I don't care if the article says so or not, you know damn well he was) walks away without as much as a parking ticket, because it might "jeopardize" his ability to STEAL??

Someone's going to Hell for this... and not just the criminal who is directly responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Meanwhile, some poor slob stealing food to survive will do time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. “When you're talking about restitution, you don't want to take away his ability to pay.”
I'm OK with this. It's setting the stage for a civil trial where he can't back out of an enormous judgement/settlement.

Ruin him them, so the medical bills get paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I agree it makes sense to me
The ability to pay restitution is more important than being punitive.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Why not both?
This douchebag manages a billion dollar fund. I'm sure that he has enough cash to hold the victim over until he gets out of prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. There shouldnt be a double standard in the way the law is enforced
If the defendant were poor, he'd be charged with the felony, end of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. every penny he steals for the rest of his life
should go to that doctor and his heirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Agreed the SOB....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. “The money has never been a priority for them. It is for us,”
Don't you love it when the truth inadvertently slips out.:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. I don't see the problem
Imagine the number of zeroes on the check. Locking him up does what, exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Did you miss the
sarcasm tag...or are you for real? Just asking :hide:

Jenn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. If someone causes me extreme pain and pays me tens of millions
...then what good is prison? I thought prison was for rehabilitation, not punishment. I thought prison was for violent, malicious criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xor Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. This guy was malicious. He fled the scene of the accident and left the guy for dead.
He deserve jail time so that he doesn't think he can cause harm onto others and then just throw money at it to make it go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. This non-prosection is wrong on so many levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC