Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tired of Repetitive Arguing About Climate Change, Scientist Makes a Bot to Argue For Him

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 01:31 AM
Original message
Tired of Repetitive Arguing About Climate Change, Scientist Makes a Bot to Argue For Him
Edited on Thu Nov-04-10 01:31 AM by Newsjock
Source: Popular Science

Getting into a climate change debate on Twitter could be even more exhausting than it sounds now that a software developer named Nigel Leck has automated the process. Tired of arguing with climate change deniers in 140 character quips, the programmer wrote a script to do it for him. Chatbot @AI_AGW scans Twitter every five minutes searching for hundreds of phrases that fit the usual denier argument paradigm. Then it serves them up some science.

Those responses are pulled from a database of hundreds of responses that the software matches up to the argument made by the original tweeter. Those who claim the entire solar system is warming are met with something like: “Sun’s output has barely changed since 1970 & is irrelevant to recent global warming” followed by a link to corresponding scientific research.

People on the other end of an argument don’t usually pick up on the fact that they are arguing with a program and will continue the argument. And AI_AGW continues to fire back responses. Even when the tweeter keeps throwing the same argument at the chatbot, it will respond with a variety of different arguments and links.

Read more: http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-11/twitter-chatbot-trolls-web-tweeting-science-climate-change-deniers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's great!
I'd love to have a version for chain emails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lob1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's very clever click that's very clever click that's very...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Will this be the start of the end of discussion?
The deniers can do this too. Waste of time at that point.
Oh well, he recognizes it's a waste of time but sees that ignorance can't be left unanswered. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I have a problem with the future tense you use
It would explain a lot, wouldn't it???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. I figured that is how many internet forums work.
Although it would be a travesty if the concepts were not seen, although if such effects were in place, then concepts of people seeing posts would be irrelevant anyways.

Side note, I am still due beer and travel money and many experiences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. That's awesome!!!! and funny to boot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. Brilliant! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulflorez Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. Brilliant!
With almost every newspaper I go to, the comment section is filled with conservative trolls.

The only online paper I've seen that seems to have pushed back the trolls is the Las Vegas Sun. They now require that you confirm your identity either via facebook or by phone with the newspaper before you can comment. Trolling went down significantly.

Let the trolls waste their time arguing with a bot while the rest of us are out talking to people face to face.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Nigel Leck ROCKS
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC