Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama is not Clinton.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
denbot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:55 AM
Original message
Obama is not Clinton.
When the House impeachment/smear machine comes after him, he will fight fire with fire. He's smart, and now has nothing to loose by fighting back.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't Clinton smart?
And I think you meant "lose."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. please, it's LOSE, OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Did you want a gold star?
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
30. Pretty.
Now, do you have one for the spelling police, since that's what the post was correcting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Spelling is an integral part of grammar, which defines proper word usage.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 10:39 AM by JTFrog
Some rules of grammar pertain specifically to spelling, such as plurals and possessives. Lose, Loose and Loss are pretty much covered under Grammar 101.

But next time I'll use this one just for you.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
41. I'm pretty sure over 50% doesn't get it.
Loose and lose are different words!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. "fight"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollowdweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't think Obama believes in the Democratic Platform enough to fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. Clinton had far better political instincts. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. Clinton was a Rhodes scholar and miles more politically astute then Obama..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
End Of The Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. +1,000,000 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Exactly, thank you! Obama was never really a leader, a great orator,
but not great on follow-through, the quintessential professor before a lecture hall of eager grad students, not the trial lawyer, who must actually face down opposing counsel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. I never got the appeal of the oratory, to tell the truth.
That whole down home preacher shtick never seemed convincing to me; having grown up listening to the genuine article, I always found Obama's impersonation of it to be very affected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
27. Even if you hated his policies, this is definitely true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DimplesinMI Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
39. President Clinton is still my favorite President
President Obama does not GET it. The issue is jobs and unemployment. He needs to create employment opportunities and react to the foreclosure crisis.

I saw President Clinton speak in Detroit last weekend that these are two issues he pounded on in the speech. Even-though his candidate he supported Lansing Mayor Virg Bernero (D) lost, soon many Michiganders will quickly realize it BIG HUGE mistake, electing "nerd" Governor-to-Be Rick Snyder (R). President Clinton help manage to have Bernero gain about 42 percent of the vote within the state.

President Obama would be WISE to bring Bill Clinton on as an advisor for the next two years because if not, I believe he will be a One-Termed President, at the rate he is going.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstokely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. He's not Roosevelt or Truman either
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. He hasn't fought back yet
I doubt that will change. He's too busy trying to make nice with cutthroats and outlaws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. Clinton Didn't Fight Back
Team Clinton brought down a special prosecutor and two House speakers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. Yeah, he's showed a lot of fight these past two years...
Jebus H. Christo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
16. Thanks for the humor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
17. I was wondering myself..
.... how wise Obama is going to think his "let the past be past" policy is when the house comes after him with trumped up after trumped up investigation.

Obama has a lot to learn and fast. I don't think he can do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
18. Clinton didn't fight back? Obama will use these losses as an excuse to be more "centrist" and weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hamsterjill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
19. No, Obama is NOT Clinton!
I, personally, would feel a whole heckuva lot better if Big Dawg were still in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndrewP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. I only wish n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #19
35. I'm grateful Obama is not Clinton. Obama has some discipline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #35
43. Yes, the Clenis is much more important than anything substantive
:headbang: :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
20. I hope Obama will finally begin to let go the left-overs from the
Bush cabinet, and replace them, as well as other right-leaning advisers, with
real Democratic ones. Even he must know by now that bi-partisanship with
the right-wingers is an impossibility. They will not change from the
one and only item on their agenda - to destroy him and the Democratic Party
totally and completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
21. Let 'Em Investigate Til They Drop...
There's a big difference between now and then...it's called the economy. That's what yesterday's election was all about. People are struggling...so much so many willingly voted for corporate toadies with talking points. They see nearly 10% unemployment and want something done. The GOTB will have to be a part of that solution...playing investigation games ain't gonna cut it.

Let it be clear...last night was not a "rushpublican mandate" of any sort...it was the frustration of an electorate that wants an economy like the one of the Clinton inquisition days. We're far from there and those who waste taxpayer money will be on the recieving end in 2012. That doesn't mean I don't expect Issa to subpoena anything that moves in the beltway, but let the GOTB play those games at their own peril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creon Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. True
It is about the economy. People are worried and fearful.

This should have been foreseen. The state of the economy was first and foremost. Congress and the WH should have taken heed.

They did not. This is the result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
23. I'm gonna flat out say it: Clinton screwed our party.
NAFTA.

GATT/WTO.

DOMA.

DADT.

Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Not keeping his pants up when he KNEW the republicans were looking for any kind of dirt they could find on him.

Giving up on Health Care reform.

Granting China most favored nation status.

Where he got things right (Breyer/Ginsburg) on the SCOTUS, his domestic policy was too centrist.

In short, Clinton made things much easier for the Corporatists to increase their power and the effects are still felt today.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Obama pretty echoes Clinton's domestic agenda, but lacks Clinton's political skills
and even Clinton's minimal willingness to fight the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. Really now. He lacks Clinton's political skills, or Clinton's white Southern Bubba-ness?
Because Obama making it to the WH was nothing short of an extreme feat of political skills, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Yes, getting elected was a feat.
Since then, we have not seen much in the way of political skills, though.

Letting his enemies define him was Obama's biggest mistake here, and that's something Clinton's operation was very careful not to do. Do you remember his '92 campaign's rule that every attack would be answered--and answered hard--during the same news cycle? That was brilliant. Acting above it all while your enemies smear you (and then apologizing the day before the election for calling enemies enemies)? Not so much.

Still, though, with Clinton we got a shitty domestic agenda that paved the way for so many of our current problems.

It would be nice if we could get a reasonably progressive candidate with some sense of strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. I won't argue that Obama's skills have been on best display since
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 11:07 AM by TwilightGardener
being elected, except for some occasional moments--he's been cautious and measured, and is generally not in fighting mode, which is his best side. That said, he's got a much bigger shitpile to wade through than Clinton ever had, and the political climate is nastier, the media is more partisan and less factual, and let's face it, no one doubted that Clinton was actually an American born in America. (edited for clarity)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. I would agree with all of that.
Obama's approach to political warfare reminds me of a line from one of T.S. Eliot's poems, "I have measured out my life with coffee spoons."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #23
47. This sums it up for me regarding Clinton:
Not keeping his pants up when he KNEW the republicans were looking for any kind of dirt they could find on him.

This had a domino effect on both parties. Yes, it was a private matter, but it made Al Gore act stupid in 2000 when he picked Lieberman to be his running mate and ran away from the so-called "peace and prosperity" Clinton kept bragging about. As for the GOP, well, we all know what happened next ("I am returning honor and dignity to the Oval Office").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DimplesinMI Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
48. Clinton HELPED THE ECONOMY!!!
The biggest period of economic growth in decades. Everyone and their Momma had a FREAKING JOB! The middle class had more gains financial during President Clinton administration than in the past 10 years under both George Bush and President Obama. The Federal Deficit was a SURPLUS...a HUGE ONE, by the way.

And my favorite legislation of President Clinton and the late Great Senator Teddy Kennedy (RIP)-SCHIP! This program alone save many lowermiddle class families huge medical costs (including myself) by providing health insurance coverage for children across our great country.

President Clinton is within the history books! President Obama would be WISE to LISTEN to him, right now on how to win this country back prior to the 2012 elections. He better get on the job....of actually creating EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES and responding to the FORECLOSURE CRISIS or he will be a one-termed President.

This is a fact people. The election last night, proved it, sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
26. Clinton DID fight back..
actually had the public on his side by the end. Clinton DID fight fire with fire, something I'm not sure Obama has in him..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
28. That's what he will fight for?
To save his own skin? :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
33. He's smart no doubt but fighting fire with fire?? Day late and
a dollar short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
40. Unfortunately, he's not.
If he handles the coming investigations the way he's handled the GOP thus far, he'll fold.

I haven't seen him fight anyone except the people who put him in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
42. I don't know. I think I see another beer summit headed our way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Rumor has it that he want's to have a summit with the GOP leaders
That's been the rumor since yesterday, but I'll guess we'll find out soon enough. Wouldn't surprise me in the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
45. Obama is not Clinton.......
That is a PAINFUL understatement!

Oh how I long for the days of EXPERIENCED strong leadership!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
46. He certainly needs a dose of the Clinton (both of em) attitude.
Bubba's domestic policies may have sucked, but he did not hesitate to raise taxes on those who could afford it and get family-friendly legislation (Family Leave) passed as well. Bubba also never let any Republican talk trash about him and would respond to personal attacks swiftly and forcefully.

Bubba also had an air of empathy which many people related too. That's more in the style column, though. But it seems to me like there are many who feel like the current President doesn't really feel how much they are suffering.

Even Hillary fought tooth and nail for the nomination and only gave up after there was less than no chance of her walking away with the nomination. That's the fight, zeal, and passion the President needs to exhibit now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC