Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did the wingnuts choose the NYT to spread their Iraq WMD lies?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 12:22 PM
Original message
Why did the wingnuts choose the NYT to spread their Iraq WMD lies?
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 12:25 PM by NNN0LHI
Anyone else thought about this? Normally the very same people who used them do not have a single good word to say about that "liberal rag." But when the big scam came who was their go to newspaper? Why is that?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Target of opportunity: they had Judith Miller in place.
Just my guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I think that is the answer. nt
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. She's not the only one. A lot of the "military experts" they have on staff
are really just mouthpieces for the MIC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. easy... no one at the time expected the Times to SHill for War
NYT's also had a reputation from the right as being left leaning, so it gave washington and the right wing cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. It cracks me up when they call the NYT a liberal rag...It has a few center-left editorial writers...
...... but it's about as pro-corporate, pro-establishment, pro-empire as you can get.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. NYT's climate protection stories are good...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. a source that one would expect the most cynicism from....wasn't cynical at all
voila!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. because they could.
Besides, if they could convince two of their whores on the NYT, then the rest of us would swallow it whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is easy. Why was Bill Clinton used to put us at ease and pass NAFTA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. and to get the left to move past BCCI and IranContra's many outstanding matters.
Gee....what would the fascists have done without their so-called 'Dem' enablers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Because it's the Paper of Record
It has a reputation that has long been far out of proportion to its quality. It gave their lies credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irritable Liberal Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. It gave Bush et al the cover they needed
See, even the NYT is corroborating our evidence, never mentioning that Judith Miller was getting her info from the same person who was feeding Bush and company the exact same garbage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. Same reason they took over CNN in the 90s....to use up what credibility they had established
in their earlier days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Because the NY Times is left wing media the same way that CNN
is left wing media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC