Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US veteran who killed unarmed Iraqis wins Tea Party support

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:14 AM
Original message
US veteran who killed unarmed Iraqis wins Tea Party support
Edited on Tue Oct-26-10 10:20 AM by Barack_America
US veteran who killed unarmed Iraqis wins Tea Party support

The basic facts are undisputed: on 15 April 2004 Ilario Pantano, then a second lieutenant with the US marines, stopped and detained two Iraqi men in a car near Falluja. The Iraqis were unarmed and the car found to be empty of weapons.

Pantano ordered the two men to search the car for a second time and then, with no other US soldiers in view, unloaded a magazine of his M16A4 automatic rifle into them, before reloading and blasting a second magazine at them – some 60 rounds in total.

Over the corpses, he left a placard inscribed with the marine motto: "No better friend, No worse enemy."

Six years later Pantano is on the verge of a stunning electoral victory that could send him to the US Congress in Washington. He is standing as Republican candidate in North Carolina's 7th congressional district, which was last represented by his party in 1871...


More:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/26/us-veteran-killed-iraqis-tea-party


Murderers, racists, witches, bigots, porn fanatics and dolts...the 2010 class of Tea Party Republican candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VioletLake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. They are Republican Party candidates. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. I was with some people Saturday night who are fairly bright
Edited on Tue Oct-26-10 10:26 AM by hedgehog
and rather successful. Over the course of a casual conversation, it became clear that these people are still focused on 9/11 and they believe that Iraq was behind it.

I'm beginning to believe that one factor in the invasion of Iraq was that after the towers fell, some people were looking for vengeance. Knowing that the 19 hijackers were dead, or arresting Osama and bringing him to trial was never going to be enough. A larger enemy had to be found and destroyed. Saddam and Iraq made a convenient stand-in. Since "they" had attacked us, "they " deserved anything and everything we did in response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Their focus belies their brightness nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Slash taxes and kill Muslims, the modern Republican party platform.
So in-keeping with the ideals our Founding Fathers set forth.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. This man is a disgrace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Then So is The USMC
Because they let him walk...his disgrace is theirs also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. From the article...
"But the officer presiding over the hearing recommended that Pantano be given non-judicial punishment for having displayed "extremely poor judgment", adding that by desecrating the Iraqi's bodies with his placard he had brought disgrace to the armed forces..."

Remember this guy was smart enough to carry out the crime when no one else was around, which of course begs the question, why was no one else around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC