Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LaHood considering outright phone cell ban in cars

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 03:32 PM
Original message
LaHood considering outright phone cell ban in cars
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/123637-lahood-proposes-outright-cell-ban-in-cars

LaHood considering outright phone cell ban in cars
By Sara Jerome - 10/11/10 11:31 AM ET


Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has heightened his rhetoric in the distracted driving debate, proposing in an interview with Bloomberg that an outright ban on cell phone use in vehicles may be appropriate.

He said drivers are distracted by any in-vehicle gadget use, even the hands-free kind, and research may lead him to encourage states to ban the devices from cars, according to the report.

“I don’t want people talking on phones, having them up to their ear or texting while they’re driving,” LaHood said the interview. “We need a lot better research on other distractions.”

That includes more research on Bluetooth-enabled hands-free calls and the in-car systems, LaHood said.

Hands-free devices, which can enable voice-activated texting and calling, are a "cognitive distraction," LaHood said. He could encourage a ban on hands-free electronics if research suggests that's necessary, a department spokeswoman told Bloomberg.

Christopher King, a telecommunications analyst at Stifel Nicolaus, said an outright vehicle cell phone ban could be tough to implement, Bloomberg reported.

“It’s so ingrained at this point, I think banning that would be extremely difficult, bordering on folly,” King said. “There would be no legitimate, public support for an outright ban.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is a good idea...
Ban the Bluetooth devices. Then ban having passengers in the car or just forbid them to speak. That'll work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Duct tape the passengers' mouths. Yeah, that'll fix it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. the local police blotter here is full of citations for "possession"
of pot which one could not see (or smell) until the driver is pulled over for something else. On the other there are no names or mention of anyone being cited for violating the hands free law.

The current law is not enforced so perhaps THAT would be a good place to start. If people talking and texting on phones were treated as though they were smoking a J or slamming Tequila shots then we would know whether the current law is enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Arbitrary and capricious
As many will point out, a car is full of distractions. Radios, passengers, GPS devices, AC & heater controls, etc, etc.

I mentioned a number of months back that I was pulled over for changing tracks on my iPod while driving down the road. California law bans texting and talking on the phone while driving, and the cop thought I had a phone in my hand. As it turns out, it's illegal to have an iPhone in your hand while driving, but it's perfectly legal to have an iPod in your hand while doing the same thing.

Unless you're going to legislate, device by device, what is allowed and what isn't, this type of thing isn't going to work. The line, to any sane person, should be drawn at using any handheld electronic device. If you don't have to hold it, then it's no more distracting than any other device (or person) in the car.

I challenge anyone to seriously claim that talking on my cars built in handsfree BlueTooth is more distracting than listening to my five year old having a hysterical temper tantrum in the back seat while I drive down the road. Are we going to ban kids next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. $500.00 tickets will change
an ingrained system real fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Don't stop there! Make it five million.
And throw them in jail for life if they can't pay.

Fuck those drivers!

If we're going to impose our will on them, let's not muck around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Sweden- get caught driving drunk- lose your license for life
no DUI problem in Sweden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Wouldn't it be cheaper and easier just to kill them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. your sarcasm
is juvenile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. Cal-Trans should set up roadside execution units
you know, to set an example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Make everyone including the driver sit in the back seat or trunk, that should solve the problem. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. i agree with him but it`s never going to happen.
remember when the right wing starts crying nanny state...ray is a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. How about a test
for those who wish to use them? Sort of like the one I had to pass to drive a motorcycle.

Some people can talk on the phone and drive, some simply cannot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Sure, like the drinking test we now have. Some people can drink and drive, some people can't.
Works every time.

NOT!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Drinking is like texting
Talking hands free on a phone can be like talking to people in a car. If you feel the need to look at the person in the car, or at the phone, maybe you shouldn't be doing either while driving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Good heavens, how did people get to work without a phone in the old days?
Oh, yeah, public transportation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I'm not into yakking up everybody
but I will accept a call if one comes my way. In any case, I always keep them short, and pull off the road if possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. Well, I guess meeting your needs can justify allowing idiots to smash into me
Edited on Tue Oct-12-10 08:17 AM by valerief
because they're not concentrating on their driving. That's not hyperbole. I was rear-ended and the guy that hit me said he was sorry, but he was calling someone on his phone. Luckily it wasn't on the highway, but it could have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. There's people who can do it
and people who can't. I could say the same thing about driving a car with absolutely no evident distractions, too. I see the very worst drivers in the country every day, to and from work, within an hour's radius of NYC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Go for it Ray!!!!!
As for Mr.King's assertion "There would be no legitimate, public support for an outright ban.” I think he might be surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just do it! Just do it! Please, please, please. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Good! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. Cells are ok but they need to ban popcorn machines in cars.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
18. how is a hands free device more distracting than talking to someone in the car with you?
Is that the next thing to be banned? No human interaction of any kind while driving?


Texting while driving is a problem that needs to be dealt with but I don't see hands free phones being something that should be banned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. It really is silly...
And yes, it smacks of "nanny state"

My mobile phone use is entirely hands free in my car, it is probably less distracting than having a passenger in the vehicle, or scanning Sirius/XM for something to listen to, etc.

The way to handle distracted driving is probably to just charge people with an additional ticket such as "Failure to Pay Full Time and Attention" if they are otherwise pulled over or involved in an accident.

I do agree that distracted driving is a problem, but trying to ban ALL mobile phone use is just misguided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. In new cars, there should be a kill-feature that disables phone signals while the engine is running.
simple.. want to chat? pull over & shut the car off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. With an On Star phone it looks like your talking to yourself....
Edited on Mon Oct-11-10 08:57 PM by Historic NY
its voice command.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
26. The cell phone ban has become a panacea for all things wrong on the road
Fact is the overall accident rate has been trending down for decades and continues to do so; recent data shows no difference between states that ban cell phone use and those that don't. While there have been some high-profile and tragic accidents relating to cell-phone use, there is not the mass carnage on the highways that is attributable to cell phones.

The same argument was made against the first car radios

Maybe the answer is to let people learn how to do it--the same way people learn to drive on ice; by driving on ice--and the next generation will be at good at communicating while driving as their grandparents were at tuning while driving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
27. Hang up the goddamned phone and drive! How hard is it to understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueamy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. I agree.
I will not even answer my phone if I am on the road.

I see young people in cars on the phone, flying down the freeway, oblivious to any other cars around them.

I just don't understand the need to have that phone plastered to your ear all friggin' day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC