Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"...(42%) say they would be less likely to vote for a candidate backed by Sarah Palin."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:48 PM
Original message
"...(42%) say they would be less likely to vote for a candidate backed by Sarah Palin."
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/10/06/two_big_negatives_for_candidates.html

Two Big Negatives for Candidates


An interesting new Pew Research survey finds two factors have emerged as major potential negatives for candidates during the midterm elections: "Fully 46% say they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who supported government loans to banks during the financial crisis two years ago, while nearly as many (42%) say they would be less likely to vote for a candidate backed by Sarah Palin."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. having Obama campaign for you is apparently a negative, too.
33% less likely to vote for the candidate if supported by Obama, 24% more likely. The idiot voters are just mad at everyone for the damage that only Republicans caused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 33% is nothing...
When you consider those 33% are probably Republican.

42%, though, is almost half the electorate and INCLUDES Republicans, probably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hahahahaha.....Aaaahhhhhh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've been saying for awhile now that we shouldn't be wasting our energy on her
She really is yesterday's news. I wish wish wish she would be the republican nominee but even they aren't that stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC