Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone *please* tell Chris Matthews that Bush was never 'elected?'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rec_report Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 04:47 PM
Original message
Can someone *please* tell Chris Matthews that Bush was never 'elected?'
Beyond calling Dictator Bush 'President Bush,' Matthews frequently discusses why the country "chose" him. The country, by any stretch of the imagination, has never "chosen" Bush. The Less-Than-Supreme Court "chose" him in 2000 and Diebold/Rove "chose" him in 2004.
:banghead:

Also, Matthews really needs to get over his obsession with Al Gore's weight.
Matthews seems to forget that Bush's cabal - Cheney, Rove, Gonzales - is a tub of lard.

Cheers,
Polar Bear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not to mention his OWN tub-o-lardiness...
>>Matthews seems to forget that Bush's cabal - Cheney, Rove, Gonzales - is a tub of lard.>>

Once again, pot, meet kettle.... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rec_report Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. 'Hello, Pot? This is Kettle.' Yes, and as another poster noted in...
this forum, Matthews made a weight remark about Michael Moore!
Most of the GOPiglet punditry is one big *mad cow burger,* so why is he on Moore's back? LOL!!

Polar Bear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, that drives me crazy too...
WAKE-UP CHRIS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Right or wrong the majority opinion is that Bush was elected
Until it can be proven definitively otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I thought it was proven, in early 2002, that Gore received more than
a half-million votes more than *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Ummmm..It's pretty clear that in 2000 Gore got the popular vote.
Who's saying otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nunyabiz Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Nobody
The problem in 2000 was the Neofascist stole the Florida electoral votes.
This was proven well beyond any reasonable doubt and the MSM flatly refused to acknowledge it & report it because the Democrats refused to challenge it.

The electoral college should have banished at least 75 years ago all it does today is throw away about 40% of every vote cast and make stealing elections child's play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rec_report Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Right, regardless of the outcome, Al Gore received more votes...
than George W. Bush in the 2000 'election.' That fact is *continually* overlooked by the Reichwing media.
Polar Bear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. A president is elected by the electoral vote, not popular.
If anybody says that Bush received more popular votes than Gore, then they are obviously wrong. If it is said that Bush was elected in 2000, then that would be correct because he won the electoral vote. This has nothing to do with the election being stolen, but simply a statement that the president is elected, as we all know, by electoral vote no matter how archaic that may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Yes, therein lays the heart of the problem: knowing and proving are not the same thing.
We all "know" that the election(s) were stolen, but it has not been "proven" inasmuch as nobody has been held accountable, no election result has been changed. Until then we can "know" all we like. I am afraid that if we went to having elections with all recountable paper ballots that there would be some who would never accept a Democratic defeat without calling the election stolen. If the election if fair I can accept the result that sometimes voters prefer the other candidate. It's not that I am looking forward to a Democrat losing, it is just that I am looking forward to the day when we can accept such a loss as being legitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rec_report Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Since there was no 'riots in the streets' on Dec. 12, 2000, you can be sure...
the GOPiglets will continue to steal elections, unmolested.
Too bad the 'Left' doesn't have a leader who is willing to actually fight. If the shoe was on the other foot, Rove would have funded an army to protest the outcome.
Yes, there are a few in Congress who actually assert themselves, but people need to open their eyes and see that we may actually need a 'revolution' to remove these predators from power.
Polar Bear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've actually heard him (in passing) remark that
stupidface was selected by SCOTUS. Not in those words, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rec_report Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes, I think you're correct. But, Matthews frames philosophical discussions...
based on the premise that 'the country chose Bush,' which is false. I wish he would add the disclaimer, prior to launching into such discussions.
Polar Bear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bush was elected
by the only body that counts - the electoral college.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC