Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU Calls On LA Officials to Abandon Plans to Use Military Heat Ray Device Against Jail Inmates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 10:14 AM
Original message
ACLU Calls On LA Officials to Abandon Plans to Use Military Heat Ray Device Against Jail Inmates
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 26, 2010
4:18 PM


CONTACT: ACLU
Will Matthews, (212) 549-2582 or 2666; [email protected]

ACLU Calls On Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Officials to Abandon Plans to Use Military Heat Ray Device Against Jail Inmates
Use of “Assault Intervention Device” Tantamount to Torture

LOS ANGELES - August 26 - The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Southern California today sent a letter to Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca demanding that he not employ a high-tech ray gun built for the military against prisoners at the Los Angeles County Jail.

Sheriff's Department officials announced last week they intend to begin using an "Assault Intervention Device" developed by the Raytheon Co. that fires an invisible heat beam capable of causing unbearable pain on inmates at the Pitchess Detention Center's North County Correctional Facility.

"The idea that a military weapon designed to cause intolerable pain should be used against county jail inmates is staggeringly wrongheaded," said Margaret Winter, Associate Director of the ACLU National Prison Project. "Unnecessarily inflicting severe pain and taking such unnecessary risks with people's lives is a clear violation of the Eighth Amendment and due process clause of the U.S. Constitution."

The ACLU's letter dismisses claims made by Baca last week that the "Assault Intervention Device" is uniquely suited to address some of the more difficult inmate violence issues and will allow Sheriff's Department officials to intervene in disturbances involving inmates without risking injury to jail staff or inmates. The ACLU letter highlights the fact that the military incarnation of the device was briefly fielded in Afghanistan in June and then withdrawn in July without ever being used. While the device was being tested by the Air Force, a miscalibration of the device's power settings caused five airmen in its path to suffer lasting burns, including one whose injuries were so severe that he was airlifted to an off-base burn treatment center.

The ACLU's letter also cites a 2008 report by physicist and less-lethal weapons expert Dr. Juergen Altmann that says the device has the ability to cause second and third degree burns over up to 50 percent of the body's surface and that without reliable protections against the re-triggering of the device against the same target subject, it has the potential to produce permanent injury or even death.

"I'm extremely disappointed in the willingness of Sheriff Lee Baca to employ this weapon-like device without consulting with the ACLU, which has court-appointment responsibility to monitor the Los Angeles County jails," said Ramona Ripston, Executive Director of the ACLU of Southern California. "Historically, we have found Sheriff Baca to understand that not everybody in county jail has been convicted of a crime. We have had advance discussions with Sheriff Baca about several different procedures, but we have not been consulted about this inhumane device."

A copy of the ACLU's letter is available online at: www.aclu.org/prisoners-rights/aclu-letter-los-angeles-county-sheriff-lee-baca-protesting-use-military-ray-run-aga

Additional information about the ACLU National Prison Project is available online at: www.aclu.org/prison

Additional information about the ACLU of Southern California is available online at: www.aclu-sc.org
###

The ACLU conserves America's original civic values working in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in the United States by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Torquemada America......
This country loves some torture.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. This device is not tantamount to torture
It is torture, and will absolutely be used that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. OK, you're in jail being attacked with a shiv. Which would you rather have happen?
A: Wait on the jail's crisis team to intervene, hopefully before any of your vital organs or major arteries are hit, or

B: Your assailant gets pain-ray zapped and is effectively stopped somewhere between slash #1 and the penetration of a lung.

Violence in jails is a real problem. If this can be an effective tool to suppress it, good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Surely you cannot be that naive?
You can't see that it would be abused? Come on now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Possibility of abuse? Check.
Possibility of saving lives during inmate-on-inmate violence? Bigger check.

I would prefer that use of the things be recorded every deployment - if abuse is documented, take appropriate action against the abuser, not the tech.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. How long before they are mounted on top of patrol cars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Apparently Bacca is unaware of the department's lack of funds
Makes me wonder if he's lying about that. How can he afford to deploy this instrument of torture and turn around and claim to be short of cash for staff and equipment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC