Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate voting on Feingold/Reid amendment right no

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 09:54 AM
Original message
Senate voting on Feingold/Reid amendment right no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's a very telling headline: "Right: no" ^_^
But what's up with Levin & Bingaman??? Very disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 09:59 AM
Original message
Dorgan too
Casey - No
Tester - No
Bayh - No
McCaskill - No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. LOL! Please, whistle, don't edit it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is it on the amendment or cloture?
Levin voted no even after speaking in support of it :shrug:

Lincoln, Landreiu, Pryor, (and of course Lieberman) also voted no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why did Webb vote no too??? :angry: :will call:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Tester, Dorgan, Reed (RI), McCaskill...all no's
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Dorgan no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. How about Ben Nelson?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Given a whole bunch of Democratic no's already...
is there really any question how Nelson (NE) will vote?

Clinton and Obama - Aye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. LOL! I don't know why I bother, just wanted to be pleasantly surprised, I guess!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. Levin, Reid (RI), Tester (MT), McCaskill, Webb voting NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Harkin, NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Rockefeller and Lieberman, NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. I am almost positive I heard Harkin AYE n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. I guess I truncated the "w" , I meant now but the voting will be close
....and most likely partisan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Not looking like it unless I'm missing something
Hearing a whole bunch of No's that I didn't expect. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm not surprised, really. I figured a lot of Dems wouldn't go for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'm amazed at how many Dems DID!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I thought it was kinda neat that Obama and Hillary both agreed to
support it--now it won't be a weapon in the campaign, by either of them OR by GOPers trying to exploit their differences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. what is on this amendment does it mention a withdrawal date?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Essentially it cuts funds and has a withdrawal date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. why won't these senators take a stand on this???
cuts funds for March 2008 what is wrong with that??

not enough dead bodies perhaps? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. Sen. Byrd voted 'aye'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. thought I heard no - but then this was for cloture, not to adopt
But then, there's a whole bunch no's

29 yes 67 no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Now McConnell claiming 'victory' over a 'surrender date'
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
24. Warner proposing fake accountably bill of Warners. Durbin says Warner bill
would allow Bush to do a signing statement where he wouldn't comply with it.

Warner's bill is to have another "independent commission" to hold Iraqi's accountable by checking if they are abiding by benchmarks. A former General would be in charge of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
25. We're three days past Mother's Day and Father's Day is
approaching and we're still calling for killing off all those kids and maiming them, some for life.

To say nothing about precious children getting killed in Iraq and millions of innocent parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. why can't someone just stop this maniac we have the in WH??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-16-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
26. Glad to see them vote on it anyway...It's progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Jul 30th 2014, 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC