Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NOAA Opens Waters Off Florida to Fin Fishing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 09:53 AM
Original message
NOAA Opens Waters Off Florida to Fin Fishing
Opening of some federal waters off the politically touchy coast of the Florida panhandle to fin fishing earlier this week underscores just how much control the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association's Marine Fisheries Services continues to exercise over the oil-soaked Gulf seafood industry.

NOAA says oil has not been observed in the 5,144 square mile area off the Florida coast opened to fin fishing Tuesday since July 3. Risk of future exposure of the Florida waters to oil is low, according to NOAA.

Sensory testing by NOAA and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of 153 samples of grouper, snapper, tuna, and mahi mahi found "no detectable oil or dispersant odors or flavors in the samples and results of chemical analysis were well below levels of concern."

(snips)



The area remains closed to non-finfish species, such as shrimp. The area west of Pensacola, FL over to Louisiana remains totally closed.

http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2010/08/noaa-opens-waters-off-florida-to-fin-fishing/

--------




Well, if NOAA and the FDA say it's OK...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. sure

but don't feed it to your kids
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What is this "sensory testing" they speak of?
Do they sniff the guts? Lick the fish?



Is that scientific?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. there have been several articles on this nose test


they smell the fish

supposedly they are trained to smell oil and the despersment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. I would not eat a damn thing coming out of those waters.
Not one damn thing.

We are being lied to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. These are national government agencies we're talking about who are giving the green light.
Commerce Dept - check



I guess the FDA got pulled in for clout.


So business is business afterall, Eat Drink & Be Merry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Truth will always take a back seat to tourism dollars in FL.
I just feel consumers should be wary of these early claims of "what oil? - all is well!"


I sense some serious arm twisting behind the scenes when "the smell test" trumps more testing.



"The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration confirms there is no chemical test to show whether fish has been contaminated by corexit"

http://www.wkrg.com/gulf_oil_spill/article/smell-test-determines-whether-seafood-is-safe/910862/Aug-04-2010_9-44-pm/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. meanwhile, over at another board, when I posted info re: recent mass fish kills
Edited on Thu Aug-12-10 11:16 AM by wordpix
I got skewered. No one wants to hear this news, I guess.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8932541

My post:

Massive fish kills in Gulf as government opens areas to fishing---Obama admin. appears incompetent

While on vacation in another state on Aug. 7, I accidentally found Fox News, which had this story on about a massive fish kill off the Miss. coast:

http://video.foxnews.com/v/4304862/bp-may-drill-again-a...

I tried to find more information on better MSM news stations whenever I was in my room, but there was NOTHING. I have not even seen this story on MSNBC.

Now that I'm back home, I've found this other recent story:

Mass Fish Kill in Fourchon, LA http://bpoilslick.blogspot.com/2010/08/mass-fish-kill-i...

and here is a good site, too: Oil Spill Citizen Report http://drlatulane.org/community/groups/gulf-oil-spill/d...

The question is: We can see the ongoing environmental damage with these fish kills and damaged crabs, so why is the Obama Admin. opening more areas to fishing? :shrug: :banghead: THIS is one reason this Obama supporter will be supporting any good progressive challenger in the 2012 primary, unless this admin gets its act together. :grr:

My bro, a staunch Repub, recently called Obama "incompetent." Normally I would have argued with him, but I just remained silent when he said it. Although I recognize O is better than Bush, I am starting to agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good news.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Who are we to question the feds?
”We know how important it is to the culture and economy of this region to get back out on the water and be able to once again harvest the seafood that the Gulf is famous for,” said Dr. Margaret A. Hamburg, commissioner of food and drugs.

“But our top priority in the wake of this disaster must be the safety of the fish that makes it to market. We are confident that the proper processes have been followed, and that consumers can feel good once again serving their families seafood from these waters,” she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC