Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A succinct portrait of politics today. Is it accurate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-10 04:24 AM
Original message
A succinct portrait of politics today. Is it accurate?
If you don't think politicians will do whatever it takes to get reelected without regard for longer term consequences of their actions either economically or socially, you are living on another planet. I put absolutely nothing past the cast of characters in DC, present or former. Anything goes when it comes to political self-preservation. (Brian Pretti, You are here)


And, if accurate, what longer-term economic and social consequences is this likely to have?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mac1949 Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-10 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sort of accurate. There are exceptions.
Weiner, Grayson and Sanders spring to mind. I'm sure there are others.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-10 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. people assume there is a moral safety net below which politicians will not go
Edited on Sat Jul-31-10 12:53 PM by yurbud
but politicians will throw babies into a meat grinder to get a donation now and a high paying job as a lobbyist, CEO, or do-nothing board member later.

The first time I realized this was when I found out Orrin Hatch was protecting the dietary supplement industry from regulation AFTER I had just served papers on the company that manufactured herbal ecstasy. Five kids had taken it at a rave and died. If I remember correctly, because it wasn't regulated, the state couldn't press criminal charges a, so they were forced to pursue a civil case on behalf of the dead kids.

I had read about similar things with supplements, like something called ''brain factor'' that was made out ground up cow brains, so of course it caused mad cow disease. These and other stories had been in the news at the time, and Hatch (and of course others), still blocked regulation even though people had died.

This is also why no one should not dismiss 9/11 conspiracy theories too quickly. If there is a buck to be made on our death, and a powerful and rich enough corporation or individual wants it, we are dead, end of story.

My wife just reminded me of the most literal example of this: ''dead peasant insurance'' when corporations would take out life insurance policies on their employees and name themselves as the beneficiaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC