Novak: ‘Poor Gonzales’ Is Terrible, ‘But There Are A Lot Of Bad People In This Administration’

[babylonsister]

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/14/novak-gonzales/

Novak: ‘Poor Gonzales’ Is Terrible, ‘But There Are A Lot Of Bad People In This Administration’

This weekend on Bloomberg Television, columnist Robert Novak offered the following “defense” of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales:

He’s terrible. He shouldn’t be there. But there’s a lot of bad people in this administration.

Novak twice referred to the Attorney General as “poor Gonzales,” casting him as an unfortunate victim of congressional oversight. In a partisan jab, Novak claimed Democrats are “pounding on this poor Gonzales who never should have been in a high government post in the first place” in order to shift attention from the Iraq funding debate. But Novak then acknowledged that Republicans “think he ought to go, too.”

Watch it at link~

Novak said, “The president is stuck with these subpar people he brought up from Texas. That’s a failing on President Bush’s part.” A failing that Novak would prefer we not pay attention to.

Transcript:

NOVAK: Margaret, the president can get rid of him any time he wants to. There’s no political setback. It would be a benefit. The president is stuck with these subpar people he brought up from Texas. That’s a failing on President Bush’s part. Now, this hearing produced no new evidence, no new questions, no new answers. It is the Democrats that are having trouble with serious questions like funding the iraq war, deciding what to do on it, passing legislation. And so pounding on this poor Gonzalez who never should have been in a high government post in the first place is all they can do. And the Republicans, they decided there’s enough of it, but let me tell you, they think he ought to go, too.

CARLSON: I didn’t say the president couldn’t get rid of him. I said he can’t get rid of him because he needs an enabler like Gonzalez in that job. And by the way, there was new evidence. A ninth U.S. Attorney who was asked to leave. But of course about that, he knows nothing. He didn’t even know how many attorneys he oversaw in the Justice Department. He underestimated it by 50%.

NOVAK: He’s terrible. He shouldn’t be there. But there’s a lot of bad people in this administration. But I think if you weren’t so hooked to the Democratic talking points, Margaret, you would know that they’re in trouble on substantive issues and they have to pound on poor Gonzalez to get anything in the press.

[MissMillie]

1. the democrats are in trouble on substantive issues?

:rofl:


Thanks Bob.

[underpants]

2. '

[Monkeyman]

4. LOL and True

[mohinoaklawnillinois]

7. Perfect response, underpants.

El Douchebag should be sitting in a cell in the new supermax federal prison in Colorado right now for outing a covert CIA agent, but of course, there are two sets of rules now in the Federal justice system.

One for people of Republican persuasion and one for everyone else.

[RufusTFirefly]

3. Perpetuating the incompetence meme

Granted, the Rethugs and Novakula have to be reasonably desperate to imply that Bush's henchmen are incompetent. But consider the alternative. If Torture Boy isn't incompetent, then what? He's knowingly committing illegal acts and violating his oath to uphold the Constitution. These crooks are facing possible impeachment and probably deserve jail time. Better to write Gonzo off as a screwup (temporarily, of course) than acknowledge the depth of criminality in this administration.

[RaleighNCDUer]

6. There ya go.

Gotta stick the finger in the dike here, before it gets completely our of control.

The repugs are on the verge of drowning.

[Phredicles]

10. Yes, although they are presenting us with a false choice here.

After all, it's perfectly possible to be criminal AND incompetent at the same time.

Hey, insantity defenses are probably in the offing...

[Lobster Martini]

5. Pardon me for a moment while my brain returns to its normal temperature

The "don't pick on the poor Attorney General, he can't help that he's incompetent" defense? Certainly, Mr. Novak. It would be cruel to mock the inept.

I will let Novak speak for himself: A Lot Of Bad People In This Administration’

[Phredicles]

8. The Dear Leader "is STUCK WITH these subpar people"?

What happened to the "they serve at the pleasure of the president" mantra they were reciting? If the Commander Guy isn't happy with the job these subpar people are doing, he can give them their walking papers.

Clearly, said mantra has it wrong; rather, they serve by pleasuring the "president".:eyes::puke:

[porphyrian]

9. What is he, a hundred and twelve? Besides, isn't he the traitor that helped "out" Valerie Plame?

Fuck what that irrelevant bastard thinks.

Edit - clarified ambiguity