Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Expert substitution of Shirley Sherrod for Mark Williams as the racial talking points lightening rod

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:12 AM
Original message
Expert substitution of Shirley Sherrod for Mark Williams as the racial talking points lightening rod
Edited on Wed Jul-21-10 08:14 AM by Phoebe Loosinhouse
The focus moved from Tea Party and its (real)racist to the NAACP and its (phony) racist in the wink of an eye

With Sherrod the fake news meisters got 3 villains for the price of one:
*The Obama administration for having the anti-white oppressor in a position of power in the USDA

*The NAACP for having Sherrod speak, thus obviously condoning her "let's all suppress whitey" viewpoint and furthering their
(the fakemeisters) plans for an ACORN like demise of the NAACP

*and of course poor Shirley Sherrod herself.

Plus, the fakemeisters got to make black racism the topic as opposed to white racism. They really like to do this because then it gives them the "aren't we all really racists?" umbrella, furthering racial divides and intolerance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for that little nugget of analysis.
I think you're dead on. It is a classic Roveian maneuver. Like when they turned the AWOL story into an attack on Dan Rather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Rarely have I read a post that so concisely summarizes the situation
My question is how come you and I understand this and yet the geniuses in the White House somehow fail to see what fools they are being played for.

You had to be blind not to have seen this coming. Didn't they learn anything from ACORN?

Oh well, you know the old saying - fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, er um. uh, CAN'T GET FOOLED AGAIN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
handmade34 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. fool me three, four, five times...
:wtf:

this has to STOP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, it was an obvious move that they don't deny. It may have backfired though n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. yup, it backfired
Nobody but their own kind will continue to take them seriously. Short term, this might have helped them. Long term, it hurt them big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Fool me once (ACORN), shame on you
Fool me twice - uhhh - can't get fooled again! :rofl:

Why oh why can't I just type that the correct way! Bush ruined that expression forever.

Anyway, the point stands - a good many people will be hesitant to believe anything that Faux "News" reports - especially on the topic of race & Democrats, where it's crystal clear that they have a horse in the race. I hope this mushrooms into a big scandal for them - there's a lot of news cycle left to this week :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Only partly backfired...
...because even now that she has been exonerated, the story is still all about her. The Mark Williams letter has completely fallen off the news cycle, and I doubt it will be resurrected.

Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. And, of course, now that Sherrod has been exonerated, ...
... rather than attack Breitbart and Faux, they attack the Obama admin for letting her go. The Obama admin was wrong, but not nearly as bad as as Breitbart and Faux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. Off to GP!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. It worked perfectly...
Even after the full information came to light...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Always seems to.
Say Glenn Beck and our Dems head for the hills apparently.

The upside is that hopefully Breitbart is through being a source anyone would use.

By the way - who gave Breitbart the edited video? That's where the story should move to now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
12.  Breitbart pretty much admitted to Hannity those were his motives
Edited on Wed Jul-21-10 06:37 PM by Turborama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC