Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sputtering Obama foreclosure program expelling more homoeowners than it's helping

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:02 PM
Original message
Sputtering Obama foreclosure program expelling more homoeowners than it's helping
The number of new homeowners entering the Obama administration's signature foreclosure-prevention effort dropped 35 percent to a one-year low in June, the third straight month during which the number of new enrollees was surpassed by the number of homeowners bounced from the program, newly-released government data show...

The program allows homeowners to permanently reduce their monthly payments after successfully completing a trial period, typically three months, which requires them to stay current on their mortgage and provide documentation substantiating their financial situation.

But once homeowners enter HAMP, there's still no guarantee they'll benefit from the possible five years of reduced payments. About 51,000 homeowners received such "permanent" modifications in June, up slightly from May but significantly down from the highs reached in March and April, when an average of about 64,000 homeowners were receiving permanent relief each month, according to Treasury data.

Instead of either temporary or permanent relief, an increasing number of distressed homeowners are being kicked out of the program. Nearly 94,000 homeowners were bounced from HAMP in June, compared to 66,000 homeowners who were granted some kind of payment relief. It's the third straight month more homeowners were kicked out of the program than entered some phase of it...

The soaring number of cancellations -- more than 529,000 -- means that, through June, two out of every five struggling homeowners who entered the program with a promise and expectation of permanent relief were ultimately expelled.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/20/hamp-june-foreclosures-recovery_n_653310.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. The problem isn't the program, AFAIK, it's that the homeowners
who are entering the program are mostly unemployed. The program would help the people who were hit by an interest rate reset, but if they don't have a job, they dont have the $$ to pay for reduced payments either!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. so
the program set up to help homeowners, many in distress due to the job market, did not take into account....unemployment? :o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. How could it? How can you pay an obligation without any money?
II can't imagine any scenario where that can happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Foo Fighter Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Can't imagine a scenario?
Does the Wall Street Bailout ring a bell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Even a bailout the size of WS wouldn't ve been big enough to bail out
all the homeowners who faced foreclosure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Well the banks DID get $75 billion to help homeowners: WHERE did it go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Not at ALL accurate. Multiple people are told they "didn't send their papers on time"
Edited on Tue Jul-20-10 11:14 PM by Bluebear
although they have, and numerous times. People ARE making their payments on time, and being told after 3-6 months that they "really don't qualify". The program is a flop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. That's how I understand it. And I know some who have gotten that run around. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. what am I missing
why are they being "expelled"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. An example:
Edited on Tue Jul-20-10 11:11 PM by Bluebear
Green and his partner, Lionel Bashore, are representing Oakland County resident Tracey Briggs, who has been stuck in a seemingly never-ending loop of disappointment in her quest to save her family’s home of 16 years.

Briggs thought she had everything in order after sending her bank her application for HAMP and all the appropriate paperwork multiple times: She finally got approved for a three-month trial mortgage modification, and after making all the payments on time, she was sure she’d be approved for permanent modification and save her family’s home.

Unfortunately, that wasn’t the case: The Briggs family is now facing foreclosure.

“When I made the final payment for the three-month trial period, I received a letter stating that foreclosure action will be taken,” said Briggs, who said when she contacted her loan servicer, she was told once again that they were missing some paperwork.

“What’s important is when they put her through the quote, unquote ‘trial period,’ she made all the payments on time. When she was approved, she had already provided all the necessary information; they had received that information — yet they gave no explanation why she was being denied,” said Green.

http://www.candgnews.com/Homepage-Articles/2010/03-10-2010/Homes-federal-MHA.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. sounds like they were unprepared for the "staggering numbers"
hard to believe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Should have gone with what Dean Baker and others advocated
Right to rent with a right of redemption after 5 years. Wouldn't have cost the treasury a cent.

But since it wouldn't have pleased the banksters... so we couldn't have effective progressive policy for main street (and incidentally- for the rest of the banks, credit unions and homeowners who value has been adversely affected too).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Another epic fail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yep
thread after thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Foo Fighter Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. IOW, the program is working as expected. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Exactly
When the bankers own the White House, what do you expect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Tu es betes comme tes pieds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
18. And obviously, BlueBear, it was evil Obama's intent to throw people out of their homes

Because he's evil like that.


:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
19. How saddening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC