Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mel Gibson Tapes Have Been Edited, Expert Says (inadmissible in court)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 08:58 PM
Original message
Mel Gibson Tapes Have Been Edited, Expert Says (inadmissible in court)
Source: AOL: Popeater

By Amber James

Mel Gibson's lawyers claim they have evidence that the explicit, racist tapes Oksana Grigorieva secretly recorded earlier this year were tampered with and edited, which would make them inadmissible in court. To date, five tapes of Gibson screaming threats and obscenities at his ex have been released by RadarOnline.

Arlo E. West, president and CEO of Creative Forensic Services, INC., and one of the nation's leading certified forensic audio and video experts, tells PopEater that the Gibson tapes are altered copies. West, who has listened to all of the tapes, says there are gaps and fading -- which are "red flags" that the recordings have been altered and therefore "cannot be considered accurate." He's also convinced Oksana had professional help to edit the tapes together from a string of conversations.

While there has been speculation about whether or not the tapes are real, RadarOnline is standing by its claims the tapes are authentic. "Numerous top experts who have analyzed tapes for the FBI and CIA, confirm the authenticity of the tapes, as does Oksana's lawyer. Mel can't deny that he said these hateful words, had these brutal arguments and made these threats. The focus remains squarely on these horrible things Mel said and the only question is when will he take accountability for his words and actions?" RadarOnline's David Perel told PopEater in a statement.

West believes these altered tapes will eventually be inadmissible in court. "There are redactions and missing pieces -- obviously things people didn't want others to hear," he analyzes. "It's possible Oksana was sitting in the editing room making sure certain things she said were not present."


Read more: http://www.popeater.com/2010/07/15/mel-gibson-tapes/?icid=main|aim|dl2|link1|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.popeater.com%2F2010%2F07%2F15%2Fmel-gibson-tapes%2F
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hear that they cut out the bit where Mel blamed the Irish for the Boston Molasses Disaster of 1919
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Sticky business, that

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. So, the edited out the part where he admitted to fucking children and small animals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. HIS expert -- you get the opinion you pay for
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 09:06 PM by LostinVA
And, he didn't have access to the original tapes, but just listened to what was released.

It'll be interesting to see what the judge and independendt experts say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. Ding Ding Ding!
My point (further down) exactly. I doubt Radaronline has the original tapes anyway, & those will be the ones that have to be taken to court.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freetradesucks Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think so
The conversation follows nicely. They are not taken out of context. He is a racist asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. He had to have been like this in his first marriage too,
his first wife didn't put up any fight to be rid of him, when he filed for divorce...I really feel badly for these women and children...especially his first wife, with all those kids, for all those years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. that goes right up there with "he was cold-reading a script and it got recorded by accident" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. I guess the parts where he called her a gold-digging cunt whore that deserves a bat to the head
were edited together to make him look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yeahyeah Donating Member (741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Serenity now,Melvin,serenity now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. His name is actually Mel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yeahyeah Donating Member (741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well,he sure is having a Mel tdown .Maybe he boxed too many kangaroos.
What happened to all that religious stuff?Didn't he have his own church,10 kids and one wife?I think it's the cigarettes.He should have his brain veins checked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Perhaps he's been boxing with fanaticism all his life . . . beginning with his father?
Can only imagine it was a brutal, hate filled childhood?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. I wouldn't doubt that she edited the tapes.
When someone is screaming at you they probably hit a lot of low blows that you don't want anyone to know.

If there are original tapes I'm sure we will hear them all. I hope there is nothing she wants to keep private because she has opened herself up to a full exam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. She denies releasing the tapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Gawker was bugging her? Wow tell me again where the criminal penalties are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. She doesn't deny she taped it. She denies she gave the tapes
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 10:46 PM by LisaL
to radar online. Presumably other people had access to these tapes that could have potentially given the tapes to radar online.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Yeah so she told someone else to give it to gawker right?
If it was unauthorized it sounds illegal to me yet she isn't doing anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Radaronline is the site that claims exclusivity for those tapes
Not Gawker. They are merely spreading the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #24
34. Whatever. Sounds like she knows where to spread dirt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Clearly, those are bits and pieces. *Parts* of conversations. So FUCKING what??
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 11:22 PM by inna
I just *hate* and abhor Gibson at this point, and I rarely use the term "hate".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. The issue is over admissibility in court.
If they're edited, they're not a "true copy" and are de facto inadmissible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Is "cut-&-pasting" considered "editing"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Not completely sure what you mean there...
...but as a general rule, no changes to the original order, content, or run length are permissible. The copy and the original must be identical. In the case of a recording, the recording must accurately reflect the actual conversation or event without additions, deletions, or alterations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. The expert was looking at whatever radar online posted.
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 11:34 PM by LisaL
Clearly the expert doesn't have access to the originals.
No doubt police will be analyzing the original recordings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. I taped an ex once, taped over old music tapes. Ex had them examined
and they said they'd been "tampered with" since there was music, then conversation, then no break back into music. Ex wanted me to send my tape recorder to the guys who worked on Watergate for further evaluation at a cost of several hundred dollars.

Aside from my admitting I'd taped over old music tapes, and laughing at the Watergate dudes examining my cheap tape player, there was a reason ex is ex.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. Key words: Mel Gibson's lawyers
what, you expected them to say "Yeah, they're legit. Mel's reporting to San Quentin tomorrow." ???

Keep squirming, Mel. Keep squirming.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Yep. Can't reseal that can. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. This is like that "muddying" strategy that the conservatives use.
If you can cast some doubt on the evidence, you don't have to win because you've denied the other party a win. And it doesn't even have to be a reasonable amount of doubt; it just just to be enough so that whoever wants to be on Mel's side can say "well the tapes were edited" and don't have to believe anything they establish, and can convince anyone who disagrees with them that they just aren't listening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I noticed Mel isn't denying it is him on the tapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
one_voice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
31. Stephen Baldwin is on Joy Behar...
doing his best defense of Mel Gibson. He said we need to love, forgive, support and help Mel. He also thinks his (Mel's) girlfriend is setting him up. He says she provoked him to get a certain reaction. Ted Haggard (sp?) also thinks we need to help Mel.

Both are idiots.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I'll forgive Mel after I forgive Stephen for his part in "Scare Tactics"
Ain't gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
35. The original tapes would be admissible though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC