Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Feds can listen to my phone conversations. I have nothing to hide....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 08:39 PM
Original message
The Feds can listen to my phone conversations. I have nothing to hide....
They'd get pretty bored actually. But the point is this...

I don't care if they are listening TO ME. I do care if they are listening to OTHER POLITICIANS FOR POLITICAL REASONS. And in THAT case, I'm against them listening to anybody.

So for all you freepers who argue - if you have nothing to hide then you shouldn't have anything to fear- well guess what, it's not about whether they are listening to me. I'm not a threat. It's about spying on other politicians for political reasons. That is the threat to Democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Freepers who say they have nothing to hide
should be told to stop wearing clothes in public (after all, they have nothing to hide, right?) and be immediately moved into glass houses with completely transparent walls. I mean, they have nothing to hide, so it shouldn't be a problem.

And yes, both the bathroom and the bedroom of the house will have those glass walls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. As that giant of jurisprudence, Edwin Meese, once said:
"There are no innocent suspects."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. I care if they listen to me the bastards! If I don't say anything but
fart in a whirlwind, that's my fucking business! I have my privacy expectations as a private citizen of the United States of America! Period. End of Story. BG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Understood.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Thank you! I do NOT want feds listening to me!
unless they have REAL reasons, which its extremely unlikely feds listening to me would have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Postman? You're a Politician?
Where do I have to move to vote for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not on your life.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. As a businessman, I don't want anyone eavesdropping on my plans and affairs. . .
How can I function in this cutthroat capitalist society I find myself in if I can't be assured my business affairs and plans aren't being compromised by an unethical wiretapper? Short of simply making unautorized wiretaps illegal, what protection do I have for the privacy of my business dealings? And if I can't be assured my "unfettered capitalist yearnings" aren't sacrosanct, what incentive do I have to move forward, given that my plans could be sold this evening to my competitors?

So there's another among millions (300+ million last census, if I'm not mistaken) for why someone would have perfectly harmless reasons for keeping perfect secrecy in our affairs. And I have many others, just for myself, so the 300+ million is simply a base number for illustrative purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Can you imagine the shrieking
if Clinton had wanted free rein to listen in on anybody he wanted to? It makes me LOL just to think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. If you have nothing to hide, they've got not business listening to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't want to feel like I am two steps from being thrown into a gulag
if one more law is passed and made retroactive unconstitutionally. I'd like to think I have some provacy to express myself to people who know and understand me, not people who might want to use information against me in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Would they care if I'm telling
my sister that bush is brainless, piece of garbage waste?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wish I knew when they WERE listening
they'd get an earful....I would call bush a turd every other word and then add cheney and rove as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. The crowning achievement of the police state--of any police state
Edited on Fri May-11-07 09:36 PM by kenny blankenship
is the citizen with nothing to hide.

This defomed stump of humanity has been given different names over the years. Maybe he can be found behind the features of Nietzsche's "Last Man" the one who would turn himself over to the authorities if he ever came to suspect his neighbor of bearing an ill will towards him. That's on the rightwing side. George Orwell writing from the left, gave this creature his most fleshed out portrait in the character of Parsons in 1984. Parsons was the Party booster and sports organizer whose children turned him over to the Thought Police for denouncing Big Brother in his sleep. Parsons applauded his kids for turning him in, and believed himself to be guilty of the charge of Thought Crime--although he had no waking memory of the event and although no more fervent lover of Big Brother could be found anywhere in Oceania--for no better reason than that the Police had accused him. In our era, Parsons would be the Fox News demographic.

The people who created this republic were all traitors to the rule of the English King. It's not for nothing that they demanded that in their new land the people should be secure in their papers and possessions. Prior to their armed revolt against what they saw as a tyrannical government (people of the 20th and 21nd centuries could teach them a thing or two) they were ALL individuals who very definitely "had something to hide."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parasim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. In a society ruled by the politics of fear...
... everybody potentially has "something to hide".

Two scriptwriters discussing a script for a political thriller they're working on.

Two kids talking about some videogame they're playing.

Somebdoy telling a joke they heard on a talk show.

Why do they "have something to hide"? Well, they may not think they have anything to hide, but since the surveillance software used by the NSA to analyze keywords in any given conversation they listen in on could potentially flag somebody as a threat simply because they use certain words like "bomb", assassination", etc. Even me using these words in this post could perhaps be flagging me as a possible threat, who really knows?

That's what pisses me off about the whole thing. Given the combination of this whole wiretapping thing which can deem anybody a "suspect" simply because the software makes some sort of conclusion based on keywords and the Patriot Act with it's ability to allow the government to arrest American citizens because they've been deemed "suspects" creates a very unsettling situation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lady President Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. When it happens, it sucks
One of my best friends worked at a law firm where almost everyone was eventually incarcerated for RICO violations. (Think a certain OH Congressman with a poor toupee.) She received the official letter from the FBI saying that they had been listening to her conversations. I know that the FBI was only entitled to listen to the first few seconds to determine who was on the other line, and then a few seconds periodically to make sure that the conversation remained legal. However, my friend was dating someone at the firm who was later indicted, so it was up to the FBI's discretion how much of the discussions about him they wanted recorded. After she found out, we spent days trying to remember everything we might have said-- sex, drugs, etc. It was awful! It sounds silly, but just thinking about it now makes me feel incredibly uncomfortable.

So no, I want the Feds to stay the hell away from my phone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC