Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A new way to get more votes, or decrease the number of votes for the neocons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 02:59 PM
Original message
A new way to get more votes, or decrease the number of votes for the neocons
I am a liberal, and I don't mind being called one, even though neocons were using the
word as a pejorative. The neocons don't like being called a neocon, they prefer to be
called a Republican. And most of us fall for it - out of politeness, perhaps.

I call them neocons because they are not Republicans. They joined the Republican
Party some 40 years ago, worked to undermine the old Republican Party leadership from
the inside, and were successful in usurping their power, and threw them out.

The Republican Party no longer exists today. But many of those who vote Republican
are not even aware of the switch-over. The neocons are smart enough to keep on using
the Republican name, so as to continue getting their votes.

Many Republicans would not vote for the neocons today, if they only knew the truth.

Why don't we take advantage of this situation? At least, we can give it a good try!
Let's all call neocons by their true party name (both when talking and writing) and
do our best to spread the practice. In time, old Republicans will catch on, and when
they do, hopefully enough of them will stop voting for the neocons. Maybe it could
make a difference as early as November this year.

To know more about them, just google "Neo-conservatism." There are tons of articles.
It is an education in itself! You'll also be able to explain things, if old-time
Republicans were to ask you questions.

Every little bit counts! Will we all do it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Okay. What do we do about the neoliberals? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Which "our" party is jampacked with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Exactly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Mainly according to the Neocons, probably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-01-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. I now understand you. But Obama is the one who jampacked
his administrastion with them - possibly for the purpose of trying to
win over the Neocons on a bipartisanship basis. If so, it has
back-fired - unless Obama has some special plan in mind. (I doubt
that he has any special plan. He was obsessed with the idea of
bipartisanship - probably still is).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. One topic at a time, if you please. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's hard to focus on neocons when neolibs are the
current perpetrators of catastrophe.

It's like planning to do battle with the army just ahead without taking into account the army flanking you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Name some prominent person whom you consider a neolib.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Rahm Emmanuel, for one.
Most Republicans and those Democrats who support de-regulation and privatization are neoliberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Yes, he is one of those I wish Obama had never employed..
I also think he could have had better people among his top Treasury members,
instead of taking on the left-over members from the Bush Administration,
Obama seems to be so obsessed with the bipartisan idea, that he bent over
backwards to accommodate the neocons. What a huge mistake! It appears that
Obama isn't about to replace them yet - not at this point.

Nothing would appease the neocons until they've kicked Obama out and replaced
him with one of their own. In the meantime, they are doing as much damage to
him in every conceivable way. They block him with obstructions, filibusers, and
one of their leaders in Congress ordered his representatives to vote "No" on
whatever Obama is trying to accomplish.

And these are supposed to be grown-up and responsible neocon leaders? Their basic
personality is like that of the small child. They are infantile! What are they
doing holding responsible positions in government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Geithner. Summers. Duncan. It's a long list. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-01-10 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Okay, I see who you think are neolibs. IThey could be giving
giving deliberately false advice to Obama, trying to make sure that he fails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Or rig the machines like they did in SC
Edited on Tue Jun-29-10 03:04 PM by golddigger
for Alvin Greene.

Edited to add: Like the Repukes did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I believe the neocons have yet to win ANY election honestly.
Too bad that so many of those who vote for them don't even know this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Could you have edited to add: Like the "Neocons" did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Sorry no. I stand by "Repukes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. "Repukes" a descriptive and challenging, but accurate term. :o)
Edited on Wed Jun-30-10 01:21 PM by Cal33
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-01-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. It's been 10 years since Al Gore was running, and the
machines were being rigged. And the majority of states today are still using these
machines. Don't Democrats really care? Can you imagine how the Neocons would have
reacted if the situation had been reversed! They would have been made illegal
within 2 years and the manufacturers of those machines would have been behind bars!

You've got to give Neocons credit for their working and fighting hard. Deomcrats
are too lackadaisical! Maybe they deserve what's happened to them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'd call republicans CONservatives after all
AIN'T they all con artists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yes, they are. A good play on words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howaboutme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. The thing about neocons
is that they are demonstrably and irrefutably a shrewd ideology that was somehow able to convince 300+ million sheep and the mainstream media that the USA should give lives and trillions in treasury to involve the USA in a "War on Terror", which included a two front war in Iraq and Afghanistan. It was based totally upon events and false intelligence that were never adequately investigated nor transparent, and were not explained by an ethical and competent commission.

The outcome for America has been perfectly clear and very negative. Neocons much prefer the use of shrewdness rather than ethics, transparency, honesty and integrity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, a high percentage of the neocon leadership is made up
of people with the disorder known as - "antisocial personality disorder."
These people can't help being the way they are. The environmental influences in
which they grew up have a lot to do with their problem, and perhaps
heredity might have played a role too. As such, they can't be be blamed, since they
had nothing to do with being the way they are. But neither should they be given the
opportunity to bring about harm and damage to others, which positions of power
definitely can enable them to do. Average citizens also have the right to be
protected from them.

Unfortunately, too many of them are already in these positions. It's up to us to
vote as many as possible out of their jobs for the sake of the whole nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yep. We haven't used the term neocon very often on this board since Obama got elected.
And it isn't as if Cheney has been keeping quiet throughout this period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Probably enough Democrats thought that they shouldn't
demonize the word as the neocons tried to demonize the word "liberal."
But I don't find "liberal" bad at all. And I don't intend to let
them change the meaning of words in the English language for me.
Also, as I've said, I use the word "neocon" to distinguish it
from "Republican." "Neocons" are not "Republicans." They
the word mainly to fool real Republicans into voting for them. The
Neocon Party is simply one big lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC